Private Companies Among Pylon Technologies Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688063) Largest Stockholders and Were Hit After Last Week's 3.6% Price Drop
Private Companies Among Pylon Technologies Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688063) Largest Stockholders and Were Hit After Last Week's 3.6% Price Drop
Key Insights
关键洞察
- Pylon Technologies' significant private companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- The top 10 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Institutions own 19% of Pylon Technologies
- 派能科技显著的私营公司所有权表明,关键决策受到更大公众股东的影响
- 前十大股东拥有公司50%的股份
- 机构持有19%的派能科技
If you want to know who really controls Pylon Technologies Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688063), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 40% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
如果你想知道谁真正控制了派能科技有限公司(SHSE:688063),那么你必须查看其股份登记的构成。我们可以看到,私营公司在该公司中拥有绝大部分股份,达到了40%的所有权。换句话说,该集团面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
As market cap fell to CN¥10b last week, private companies would have faced the highest losses than any other shareholder groups of the company.
上周市值下降至100亿人民币,私营企业可能会面临比公司其他股东群体更高的损失。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Pylon Technologies, beginning with the chart below.
让我们更深入地探讨派能科技的每种所有者类型,首先从下面的图表开始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Pylon Technologies?
机构所有权对派能科技的意义是什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与一个常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买纳入相关基准指数的大型公司股票。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Pylon Technologies. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Pylon Technologies' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如你所看到的,机构投资者在派能科技中拥有相当数量的股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经考察了这只股票,并且他们看好它。但像其他任何人一样,他们也可能是错的。当多个机构持有一只股票时,总是存在他们处于“拥挤交易”的风险。当这种交易出错时,多个参与方可能会争相快速卖出股票。在没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更高。你可以在下面看到派能科技的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住,故事总是还有更多的内容。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Pylon Technologies. The company's largest shareholder is Zhongxingxin Telecom Co.,Ltd, with ownership of 25%. With 12% and 4.4% of the shares outstanding respectively, Paili (Ningbo) Venture Capital Partnership (Limited Partnership) and Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Limited, Asset Management Arm are the second and third largest shareholders.
我们注意到对派能科技对冲基金没有实质性投资。该公司的最大股东是中兴信通信有限公司,持股比例为25%。排里(宁波)创投合伙企业(有限合伙)和香港交易及结算有限公司的资产管理部门分别持有12%和4.4%的流通股,成为第二和第三大股东。
On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 10 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.
进一步检查发现,公司超过一半的股份由前10大股东持有,这表明大股东的利益在一定程度上被小股东所平衡。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究机构的持有情况是判断和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以实现同样的目的。目前有合理数量的分析师在覆盖此股票,因此了解他们对未来的整体看法可能会有用。
Insider Ownership Of Pylon Technologies
派能科技的内部持股
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少包括董事会成员。公司管理层负责业务的运行,但CEO需要对董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人拥有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情况下,这使得其他股东更难让董事会对决策负责。
Our information suggests that Pylon Technologies Co., Ltd. insiders own under 1% of the company. But they may have an indirect interest through a corporate structure that we haven't picked up on. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own CN¥9.6m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我们的信息显示,派能科技有限公司的内部人士拥有不到1%的股份。但他们可能通过我们尚未注意到的公司结构间接持有股份。请记住,这是一家大公司,内部人士持有价值960万人民币的股票。绝对值可能比比例股份更重要。看到一些内部人士持股总是好的,但值得检查一下这些内部人士是否在出售股份。
General Public Ownership
公众持股
With a 40% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Pylon Technologies. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公众持有40%的股份,主要由个人投资者组成,因此对派能科技有一定程度的影响。虽然这个群体不一定能决定一切,但确实可以对公司的运行产生实际影响。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司所有权
It seems that Private Companies own 40%, of the Pylon Technologies stock. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
看起来派能科技的股票有40%由私人公司持有。深入研究一下这个问题可能是值得的。如果相关方,如内部人士,涉及这些私人公司的利益,应该在年度报告中披露。私人公司也可能对该公司有战略利益。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Pylon Technologies has 2 warning signs (and 1 which is a bit concerning) we think you should know about.
虽然考虑拥有公司的不同群体是非常重要的,但还有其他更重要的因素。以风险为例——派能科技有2个警告信号(还有1个稍微令人担忧的)我们认为你应该知道。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最终,决定这个业务的所有者表现如何的,是未来而不是过去。因此,我们认为查看这份免费的报告是明智的,报告显示分析师是否预测了一个更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。