Bill Ackman Once Asked A $700 Million Question To Warren Buffett On Leverage. The Oracle Of Omaha's Response Shows Where He Places Trust When He Invests In A Company
Bill Ackman Once Asked A $700 Million Question To Warren Buffett On Leverage. The Oracle Of Omaha's Response Shows Where He Places Trust When He Invests In A Company
Bill Ackman once sought insights from Berkshire Hathaway's chairman Warren Buffett about the investment appeal of the Salomon Brothers.
比尔·阿克曼曾向伯克希尔·哈撒韦公司董事长沃伦·巴菲特寻求有关所罗门兄弟投资吸引力的见解。
What Happened: At the 1994 Berkshire Hathaway annual meeting, Ackman, then a young hedge fund manager, raised a critical question about Salomon Brothers.
发生了什么:在1994年的伯克希尔·哈撒韦公司年会上,当时的年轻对冲基金经理阿克曼提出了有关所罗门兄弟的关键问题。
He directed his question to Buffett, asking, "What is the appeal of the business to you, given its leverage of 30-to-1 and relatively modest returns on equity?"
他向巴菲特提问,问道:“鉴于其杠杆率为30比1且股本回报率相对较低,该业务对你的吸引力是什么?”
Buffett responded thoughtfully, acknowledging the high leverage involved but underscoring the importance of leadership in managing such risks.
巴菲特深思熟虑地做出了回应,承认了所涉及的高杠杆率,但强调了领导力在管理此类风险方面的重要性。
The Oracle of Omaha praised the efforts of Salomon's leaders, including Deryck Maughan, Bob Denham, and John McFarlane, who navigated the company through challenging times without prior discussions on compensation or guarantees.
奥马哈甲骨文赞扬了包括德里克·莫恩、鲍勃·德纳姆和约翰·麦克法兰在内的所罗门领导人的努力,他们在没有事先讨论薪酬或担保的情况下带领公司度过了充满挑战的时期。
"The test will be whether they control the business in a way that leverage doesn't prove dangerous," Buffett stated, noting that businesses using significant leverage should expect higher returns on equity, given the inherent risk, but that successful management of that risk was paramount.
巴菲特表示:“考验的将是他们是否以杠杆率不危险的方式控制业务,” 他指出,鉴于固有的风险,使用大量杠杆的企业应该期望更高的股本回报率,但成功管理这种风险至关重要。
Why It Matters: Salomon Brothers, founded in 1910, was a major player on Wall Street, renowned for its fixed-income trading.
为何重要:所罗门兄弟成立于1910年,是华尔街的主要参与者,以其固定收益交易而闻名。
In 1987, the bond trading firm revealed a $70 million loss from debt related to its junk bond trading activities. This set off a chain of events that contributed to the 1987 market crash, although other factors also played a role in the market's downturn.
1987年,这家债券交易公司透露,与其垃圾债券交易活动有关的债务蒙受了7,000万美元的损失。这引发了一系列事件,导致了1987年的市场崩溃,尽管其他因素也在市场低迷中发挥了作用。
Salomon traders were caught submitting fraudulent bids for Treasury bonds in violation of trading regulations.
所罗门交易员被抓到违反交易法规提交欺诈性国债投标。
Just before the scandal, Buffett had invested $700 million in Salomon Brothers. The controversy resulted in a loss of one-third of his investment.
就在丑闻发生之前,巴菲特已向所罗门兄弟投资了7亿美元。这场争议导致他损失了三分之一的投资。
To restore order during the turmoil, Buffett took control of the company for nine months, methodically removing those involved in the scandal.
为了在动荡期间恢复秩序,巴菲特控制了公司九个月,有条不紊地驱逐了参与丑闻的人。
By the time the firm was stabilized, it had been sold to Travelers Companies Inc. Buffett had walked away with a substantial profit, as his investment had more than doubled.
当公司稳定下来时,它已经被出售给了旅行者公司。巴菲特已经获得了可观的利润,因为他的投资翻了一番多。
Travelers Group merged Salomon Brothers with Smith Barney, creating Salomon Smith Barney, which later became part of Citigroup following the 1998 merger between Travelers and Citicorp.
旅行者集团将所罗门兄弟与史密斯·巴尼合并,创建了所罗门·史密斯·巴尼,后来在1998年旅行者与花旗集团合并后成为花旗集团的一部分。
Over time, Citigroup integrated and eventually dismantled the Salomon Smith Barney brand. By the mid-2000s, Salomon Brothers ceased to exist as a standalone entity.
随着时间的推移,花旗集团整合并最终解散了所罗门·史密斯·巴尼品牌。到2000年代中期,所罗门兄弟不再作为一个独立实体存在。
- Microsoft Scoops Up 485,000 Nvidia AI Chips, Twice As Many As Its Closest Rival Meta: Report
- 微软收购了48.5万个Nvidia AI芯片,是其最接近的竞争对手Meta的两倍:报告
Disclaimer: This content was partially produced with the help of Benzinga Neuro and was reviewed and published by Benzinga editors.
免责声明:该内容部分是在Benzinga Neuro的帮助下制作的,并由Benzinga编辑审查和发布。
Photos courtesy: Wikimedia and Shutterstock
照片由维基媒体和Shutterstock提供