O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:ORLY) Institutional Investors Lost 4.1% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains
O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:ORLY) Institutional Investors Lost 4.1% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains
Key Insights
关键洞察
- Institutions' substantial holdings in O'Reilly Automotive implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- The top 25 shareholders own 51% of the company
- Insiders have sold recently
- 机构在奥莱利的重大持股意味着他们对公司股价有显著影响
- 前25大股东拥有公司51%的股份
- 内部人士最近出售了股票。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of O'Reilly Automotive, Inc. (NASDAQ:ORLY), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 87% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
要了解谁真正控制着奥莱利自动化公司(纳斯达克:ORLY),理解业务的所有权结构非常重要。我们可以看到机构在公司中占有87%的主要股份。换句话说,该集团在对公司的投资中将获得最多(或失去最多)。
Institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's market cap fell by US$3.0b last week. However, the 28% one-year return to shareholders may have helped lessen their pain. But they would probably be wary of future losses.
机构投资者在公司市值在上周下降30亿美元后承受了最高损失。然而,对股东而言28%的年回报可能帮助减轻了他们的痛苦。但他们可能会对未来的损失感到警惕。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about O'Reilly Automotive.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们有关奥莱利的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About O'Reilly Automotive?
机构所有权告诉我们关于奥莱利汽车公司的什么?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时,会与基准进行比较,因此一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常对该股票会更加热情。我们预期大多数公司在登记时都会有一些机构,尤其是当它们正在增长时。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in O'Reilly Automotive. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see O'Reilly Automotive's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如你所看到的,机构投资者在奥莱利拥有相当数量的股份。这可能表明该公司在投资社区中具有一定的可信度。然而,最好对依赖机构投资者带来的所谓认可保持谨慎。他们有时也会犯错。当多家机构持有一只股票时,总是存在“拥挤交易”的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多个参与者可能会竞争迅速卖出股票。这种风险在没有增长历史的公司中更高。你可以在下面看到奥莱利的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住,事情总是有更多的故事。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in O'Reilly Automotive. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 8.9% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.0% and 4.2%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
由于机构投资者拥有超过一半的已发行股票,董事会可能需要关注他们的偏好。我们注意到对奥莱利的对冲基金没有进行有意义的投资。先锋集团目前是公司的最大股东,持有8.9%的流通股份。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有7.0%和4.2%的流通股份。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 25 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
仔细查看我们的股权数据,前25大股东的累计持股达到51%,这意味着没有单一股东拥有多数股权。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
虽然研究一家公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解市场趋势同样也是有意义的。现在有相当多的分析师关注这只股票,因此了解他们对未来的整体看法可能会很有用。
Insider Ownership Of O'Reilly Automotive
奥莱利汽车公司的内部股东
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
虽然对内幕人的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内幕人。公司管理层向董事会负责,后者应该代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时候高层管理者自己也是董事会成员。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人拥有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情况下,这使得其他股东更难让董事会对决策负责。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of O'Reilly Automotive, Inc. in their own names. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$591m worth of shares. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
我们的数据显示,内部人士在奥莱利汽车公司名下拥有不到1%的股份。作为一家大型公司,我们仅期望内部人士拥有一小部分股份。但值得注意的是,他们持有价值59100万美元的股份。看到董事会成员持有股份是件好事,但值得检查一下这些内部人士是否有在买入。
General Public Ownership
公众持股
With a 13% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over O'Reilly Automotive. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
一般公众拥有13%的股份,主要由个人投资者组成,对奥莱利汽车公司有一定的影响力。虽然这个群体不一定能决定公司事务,但确实能够对公司的运营产生真实的影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with O'Reilly Automotive (at least 1 which can't be ignored) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
我发现了解一个公司的真正拥有者非常有趣。但要真正获得洞察,我们还需要考虑其他信息。考虑到始终存在的投资风险。我们已经确定了奥莱利汽车的三个警示信号(至少一个是不能忽视的),理解这些信号应该是您投资过程的一部分。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最终,决定这个业务的所有者表现如何的,是未来而不是过去。因此,我们认为查看这份免费的报告是明智的,报告显示分析师是否预测了一个更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。