With a 46% Stake, Bentley Systems, Incorporated (NASDAQ:BSY) Insiders Have a Lot Riding on the Company
With a 46% Stake, Bentley Systems, Incorporated (NASDAQ:BSY) Insiders Have a Lot Riding on the Company
Key Insights
关键洞察
- Bentley Systems' significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
- A total of 8 investors have a majority stake in the company with 53% ownership
- Institutions own 40% of Bentley Systems
- Bentley Systems的重大内部持股表明对公司扩张的内在利益
- 共有8位投资者在公司拥有53%的多数股权。
- 机构持有Bentley Systems 40%的股份
If you want to know who really controls Bentley Systems, Incorporated (NASDAQ:BSY), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 46% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
如果你想知道谁真正控制了Bentley Systems, Incorporated (纳斯达克:BSY),你需要查看其股份注册的组成情况。个人内部人士持有46%的股份,拥有公司最多的股份。换句话说,该群体面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
With such a notable stake in the company, insiders would be highly incentivised to make value accretive decisions.
在公司中持有如此显著的股份,内部人士将被高度激励做出增值决策。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Bentley Systems.
让我们更深入地了解一下不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于Bentley Systems的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Bentley Systems?
机构持股对Bentley Systems的影响
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与一个常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买纳入相关基准指数的大型公司股票。
We can see that Bentley Systems does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Bentley Systems' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我们可以看到Bentley Systems确实有机构投资者,他们持有公司相当大一部分的股票。这表明该公司在投资界具有一定的可信度。然而,过于依赖机构投资者所带来的所谓验证并不是明智的。他们有时也会出错。当多个机构共同持有某只股票时,总是存在他们处于“拥挤交易”的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞争迅速卖出股票。这种风险在没有增长历史的公司中更高。您可以在下面看到Bentley Systems的历史盈利和营业收入,但请记住,背后总是有更多的故事。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Bentley Systems. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Corinne Bentley with 11% of shares outstanding. Marie Bentley is the second largest shareholder owning 9.1% of common stock, and Keith Bentley holds about 6.4% of the company stock. Keith Bentley, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Member of the Board of Directors.
我们注意到对Bentley Systems的对冲基金没有重要投资。根据我们的数据,我们可以看到最大的股东是Corinne Bentley,拥有11%的流通股。Marie Bentley是第二大股东,持有9.1%的普通股,而Keith Bentley持有大约6.4%的公司股票。Keith Bentley是第三大股东,同时担任董事会成员。
We did some more digging and found that 8 of the top shareholders account for roughly 53% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.
我们进行了更多的挖掘,发现前八大股东大约占据了53%的注册股份,这意味着除了大股东,还有一些小股东,从而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究机构的持有情况是判断和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以实现同样的目的。目前有合理数量的分析师在覆盖此股票,因此了解他们对未来的整体看法可能会有用。
Insider Ownership Of Bentley Systems
Bentley Systems内部股权
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
内部人的定义在不同国家之间可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是算作内部人。公司管理层负责运营业务,但首席执行官将向董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会的成员。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人拥有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情况下,这使得其他股东更难让董事会对决策负责。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Bentley Systems, Incorporated. Insiders own US$7.0b worth of shares in the US$15b company. That's quite meaningful. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我们的数据显示,内部人士在Bentley Systems, Incorporated中持有大量股份。内部人士持有价值70亿美元的股票,而该公司的市值为150亿美元。这是相当重要的。看到这样的投资水平很不错。您可以在这里查看这些内部人士最近是否有买入。
General Public Ownership
公众持股
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 14% stake in Bentley Systems. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
公众,通常是个体投资者,持有Bentley Systems 14%的股份。虽然这个持股规模相当可观,但如果决策与其他大型股东不一致,可能不足以改变公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Bentley Systems has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
我发现查看究竟是谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。以风险为例 —— Bentley Systems 有 1 个警告信号,我们认为你应该注意。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一样,你可能想考虑这家公司是会增长还是缩小。幸运的是,你可以查看这份免费的报告,了解分析师对其未来的预测。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。