Trustmark Corporation's (NASDAQ:TRMK) Institutional Investors Lost 4.9% Over the Past Week but Have Profited From Longer-term Gains
Trustmark Corporation's (NASDAQ:TRMK) Institutional Investors Lost 4.9% Over the Past Week but Have Profited From Longer-term Gains
Key Insights
关键洞察
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Trustmark implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- A total of 7 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Insiders have been selling lately
- 机构在Trustmark的 substantial holdings 表明他们对公司股票价格有重要影响。
- 共有7名投资者拥有该公司的控股权,持有51%的股份
- 内部人士最近一直在卖出。
A look at the shareholders of Trustmark Corporation (NASDAQ:TRMK) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 78% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
查看Trustmark Corporation (纳斯达克:TRMK) 的股东可以告诉我们哪个群体最有权力。持有公司最多股票的群体,大约78%,也就是机构。如果股票上涨,该群体将获得最大利益(或者在下滑时损失最大)。
Losing money on investments is something no shareholder enjoys, least of all institutional investors who saw their holdings value drop by 4.9% last week. However, the 33% one-year returns may have helped alleviate their overall losses. But they would probably be wary of future losses.
投资亏损是所有股东都不愿意经历的,尤其是上周其持有价值下跌了4.9%的机构投资者。然而,33%的年回报率可能在一定程度上缓解了他们的整体损失。但他们可能会对未来的损失持谨慎态度。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Trustmark, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入探讨Trustmark的每种所有者类型,首先是下面的图表。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Trustmark?
机构所有权告诉我们关于Trustmark什么?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构的表现与近似当地市场的指数进行比较。因此,他们通常更加关注那些被纳入主要指数的公司。
We can see that Trustmark does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Trustmark's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我们可以看到Trustmark确实有机构投资者,他们持有公司股票的一部分。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师查看了这只股票,并且他们喜欢它。但和其他人一样,他们也可能会出错。如果多个机构同时改变对一只股票的观点,股票价格可能会迅速下跌。因此,值得查看Trustmark的历史盈利记录。当然,未来才是真正重要的。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Trustmark is not owned by hedge funds. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 15% of shares outstanding. With 11% and 6.7% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and Dimensional Fund Advisors LP are the second and third largest shareholders.
投资者应注意,机构实际上拥有超过一半的公司股份,因此他们可以集体施加重大影响力。Trustmark并不被对冲基金持有。贝莱德目前是公司的最大股东,持有15%的流通股份。先锋集团和多维基金顾问分别持有11%和6.7%的流通股份,是第二和第三大股东。
On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 7 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.
进一步检查发现,公司的七大股东持有超过一半的股份,这表明大股东的利益在一定程度上与小股东的利益保持平衡。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究一家公司的机构持股可以为你的研究增值,同时研究分析师的建议也是一个很好地做法,以更深入地了解股票的预期表现。 目前有相当数量的分析师覆盖该股票,因此了解他们对未来的总体看法可能会很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Trustmark
Trustmark的内部持股
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
内部人的定义在不同国家之间可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是算作内部人。公司管理层负责运营业务,但首席执行官将向董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会的成员。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部持股是积极的,因为这表明董事会与其他股东保持良好的一致性。然而,在某些情况下,权力在这个群体中过于集中。
We can report that insiders do own shares in Trustmark Corporation. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$35m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我们可以报告内部人士确实拥有Trustmark公司的股票。 这是一个大公司,因此看到这种程度的对齐是件好事。内部人士拥有价值3500万美元的股票(按当前价格计算)。看到内部人士有这种程度的投资是件好事。您可以在这里查看这些内部人士是否最近进行了买入。
General Public Ownership
公众持股
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 20% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公众——包括散户投资者——在这家公司中拥有20%的股份,因此不能轻易被忽视。虽然这种股权规模可能不足以影响政策决定,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Trustmark better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for Trustmark that you should be aware of before investing here.
始终考虑拥有公司股份的不同群体是值得的。但要更好地理解Trustmark,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。 例如,我们发现了3个Trustmark的警告信号,在您投资之前应该了解这些。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一样,你可能想考虑这家公司是会增长还是缩小。幸运的是,你可以查看这份免费的报告,了解分析师对其未来的预测。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。