With 33% Ownership, SG Micro Corp (SZSE:300661) Insiders Have a Lot Riding on the Company's Future
With 33% Ownership, SG Micro Corp (SZSE:300661) Insiders Have a Lot Riding on the Company's Future
Key Insights
关键洞察
- Insiders appear to have a vested interest in SG Micro's growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
- 52% of the business is held by the top 9 shareholders
- 32% of SG Micro is held by Institutions
- 内部人士似乎对圣邦股份的增长有既得利益,因为他们持有大量股份
- 52%的业务由前9大股东持有
- 32%的圣邦股份由机构持有
To get a sense of who is truly in control of SG Micro Corp (SZSE:300661), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 33% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
要了解谁真正控制着圣邦股份(SZSE:300661),了解公司的持股结构非常重要。 个人内部人士持有33%的股份,是公司最大的股东。 换句话说,这个群体面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
With such a notable stake in the company, insiders would be highly incentivised to make value accretive decisions.
在公司中持有如此显著的股份,内部人士将被高度激励做出增值决策。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about SG Micro.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于圣邦股份的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About SG Micro?
机构持股对我们了解圣邦股份有什么启示?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时,会与基准进行比较,因此一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常对该股票会更加热情。我们预期大多数公司在登记时都会有一些机构,尤其是当它们正在增长时。
We can see that SG Micro does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see SG Micro's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我们可以看到圣邦股份确实有机构投资者,他们持有公司相当一部分的股票。这表明公司在投资社区中具有一定的可信度。然而,最好对依赖机构投资者带来的所谓验证保持警惕。他们有时也会出错。当多个机构共同持有某只股票时,总是存在“拥挤交易”的风险。当这样的交易出现问题时,多个参与者可能会争相快速卖出股票。在没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更高。你可以在下面看到圣邦股份的历史盈利和营业收入,但请记住,背后总有更多的故事。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in SG Micro. The company's CEO Shilong Zhang is the largest shareholder with 19% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 8.4% and 5.1%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Interestingly, the second and third-largest shareholders also happen to be the Secretary and Member of the Board of Directors, respectively. This once again signifies considerable insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.
对冲基金在圣邦股份的持股不多。公司的CEO张士龙是最大的股东,持有19%的流通股。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有8.4%和5.1%的流通股。有趣的是,第二和第三大股东恰好是董事会的秘书和董事成员。这再次表明,公司主要股东中有相当多的内部持股。
We did some more digging and found that 9 of the top shareholders account for roughly 52% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.
我们进一步挖掘发现,前9大股东大约占总登记的52%,这意味着除了大股东之外,还存在一些小股东,从而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究一家公司的机构持有情况可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的推荐也是一个好的做法,以更深入地了解股票的预期表现。许多分析师在跟踪这只股票,因此也值得看看他们的预测。
Insider Ownership Of SG Micro
圣邦股份的内部持股
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
内部人的定义在不同国家之间可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是算作内部人。公司管理层负责运营业务,但首席执行官将向董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会的成员。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人拥有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情况下,这使得其他股东更难让董事会对决策负责。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in SG Micro Corp. Insiders own CN¥14b worth of shares in the CN¥42b company. That's quite meaningful. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我们的信息显示,内部人士在圣邦股份持有大量股份。内部人士拥有价值140亿人民币的股票,而该公司市值为420亿人民币。这是相当有意义的。看到这种投资水平令人欣慰。您可以在这里检查这些内部人士最近是否有进行购买。
General Public Ownership
公众持股
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 30% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
公众——包括散户投资者——在公司中拥有30%的股份,因此无法轻易忽视。这种规模的所有权虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不一致,可能不足以改变公司政策。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司所有权
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 4.7%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我们的数据表明,私营公司持有该公司4.7%的股份。仅凭这一事实很难得出任何结论,因此值得研究一下这些私营公司的所有者。有时候,内部人士或其他相关方可能通过独立的私营公司对上市公司的股份感兴趣。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - SG Micro has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
虽然考虑拥有公司的不同群体是非常值得的,但还有其他因素更为重要。例如,风险——圣邦股份目前有1个我们认为您应该注意的警告信号。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您想了解分析师对未来增长的预测,请不要错过这份关于分析师预测的免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。