Rambus Inc.'s (NASDAQ:RMBS) Recent 11% Pullback Adds to One-year Year Losses, Institutional Owners May Take Drastic Measures
Rambus Inc.'s (NASDAQ:RMBS) Recent 11% Pullback Adds to One-year Year Losses, Institutional Owners May Take Drastic Measures
Key Insights
关键洞察
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Rambus' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- 51% of the business is held by the top 15 shareholders
- Insiders have sold recently
- 显著的高机构持股意味着Rambus的股票价格对他们的交易行为敏感
- 51%的业务由前15大股东持有
- 内部人士最近出售了股票。
Every investor in Rambus Inc. (NASDAQ:RMBS) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 89% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
每位Rambus Inc.(纳斯达克:RMBS)的投资者都应该意识到最强大的股东群体。 机构持有89%的股份,是公司最大股东。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将获得最大益处(或在下跌时损失最多)。
And so it follows that institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$5.6b last week after a 11% drop in the share price. Needless to say, the recent loss which further adds to the one-year loss to shareholders of 25% might not go down well especially with this category of shareholders. Often called "market movers", institutions wield significant power in influencing the price dynamics of any stock. As a result, if the decline continues, institutional investors may be pressured to sell Rambus which might hurt individual investors.
因此可以看出,机构投资者是受到影响最大的一群,因为上周公司市值下降至56亿美金后,股价下跌了11%。不必说,最近的损失使股东一年的损失进一步增加至25%,这对于这类股东来说,可能并不好过。机构通常被称为“市场推动者”,在影响任何股票的价格动态方面具有显著的权力。因此,如果下跌持续,机构投资者可能会被迫卖出Rambus,这可能伤害到个人投资者。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Rambus, beginning with the chart below.
让我们更深入地了解Rambus的每一类型所有者,从下面的图表开始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Rambus?
机构持股告诉我们有关rambus的什么情况?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构的表现与近似当地市场的指数进行比较。因此,他们通常更加关注那些被纳入主要指数的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Rambus. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Rambus, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
如您所见,机构投资者在Rambus中占有相当的股份。这显示出在专业投资者中有一定的信誉。但我们不能仅靠这一事实,因为机构有时候也会做出糟糕的投资,就像所有人一样。如果两家大型机构投资者同时试图抛售一只股票,往往会看到股价大幅下跌。因此,查看Rambus过去的盈利轨迹是值得的(如下)。当然,也要记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Rambus. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc. with 13% of shares outstanding. With 12% and 4.5% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.
由于机构投资者拥有超过一半的已发行股票,董事会可能需要关注他们的偏好。对Rambus而言,对冲基金持有的股份不多。从我们的数据来看,最大的股东是贝莱德,持有13%的流通股。其次是先锋集团,持有12%的流通股,而道富银行持有4.5%的流通股。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 15 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
从股东登记册来看,我们可以看到51%的股份由前15大股东控制,这意味着没有任何单一股东在所有权中拥有多数权益。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
虽然研究公司的机构持股数据是合理的,但研究分析师意见也很有意义,以了解趋势如何。相当多的分析师覆盖了这只股票,因此你可以很轻松地查看预期增长。
Insider Ownership Of Rambus
rambus的内部所有权
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
虽然内部人的精确定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员都是内部人。管理层最终要向董事会负责。然而,管理者成为执行董事会成员并不罕见,尤其是在他们是创始人或首席执行官的情况下。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部持股显示领导层像真正的公司所有者一样思考时,这是积极的。然而,高比例的内部持股也可能给予公司内部小团体巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Our information suggests that Rambus Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. It's a big company, so even a small proportional interest can create alignment between the board and shareholders. In this case insiders own US$32m worth of shares. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我们的信息显示,Rambus公司的内部人士拥有公司不足1%的股份。 这是一家大公司,因此即使是小的比例权益也可以在董事会和股东之间创造一致性。在这种情况下,内部人士拥有价值3200万美元的股份。 看到至少一些内部持股总是好的,但值得检查一下这些内部人士是否在出售。
General Public Ownership
公众持股
With a 10% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Rambus. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
拥有10%股份的公众,主要是个体投资者,对Rambus有一定的影响力。 虽然这个群体不一定能做主,但确实对公司的运行产生实际影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for Rambus you should know about.
我发现研究公司究竟由谁拥有是非常有趣的。但要真正获得深入了解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。 比如考虑风险。每个公司都有风险,我们发现了 Rambus 的 2 个警告信号,你应该了解这些。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最终,决定这个业务的所有者表现如何的,是未来而不是过去。因此,我们认为查看这份免费的报告是明智的,报告显示分析师是否预测了一个更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。