Capital Allocation Trends At Shake Shack (NYSE:SHAK) Aren't Ideal
Capital Allocation Trends At Shake Shack (NYSE:SHAK) Aren't Ideal
Did you know there are some financial metrics that can provide clues of a potential multi-bagger? Firstly, we'll want to see a proven return on capital employed (ROCE) that is increasing, and secondly, an expanding base of capital employed. If you see this, it typically means it's a company with a great business model and plenty of profitable reinvestment opportunities. However, after investigating Shake Shack (NYSE:SHAK), we don't think it's current trends fit the mold of a multi-bagger.
你知道有一些财务指标可以提供潜在多倍收益股的线索吗?首先,我们希望看到一个逐渐增加的已投资资本回报率(ROCE),其次是不断扩大的已投资资本基础。如果你看到这些,通常意味着这是一家拥有良好商业模式和大量盈利再投资机会的公司。然而,在调查了Shake Shack(纽交所:SHAK)后,我们认为它当前的趋势不符合多倍收益股的标准。
What Is Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)?
什么是资本回报率(ROCE)?
For those that aren't sure what ROCE is, it measures the amount of pre-tax profits a company can generate from the capital employed in its business. The formula for this calculation on Shake Shack is:
对于那些不确定什么是ROCE的人来说,它衡量的是公司从其业务中已投资资本产生的税前利润。对Shake Shack的计算公式是:
Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)
资本利用率 = 利息和税前利润(EBIT) ÷ (总资产 - 流动负债)
0.018 = US$26m ÷ (US$1.7b - US$176m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2024).
0.018 = 2600万美金 ÷ (17亿美金 - 176百万美金)(基于截至2024年9月的过去12个月)。
Therefore, Shake Shack has an ROCE of 1.8%. In absolute terms, that's a low return and it also under-performs the Hospitality industry average of 9.1%.
因此,Shake Shack的ROCE为1.8%。绝对值来看,这一回报率较低,并且也低于酒店行业平均水平的9.1%。
In the above chart we have measured Shake Shack's prior ROCE against its prior performance, but the future is arguably more important. If you'd like, you can check out the forecasts from the analysts covering Shake Shack for free.
在上面的图表中,我们对Shake Shack之前的资本回报率(ROCE)进行了测量,并与其之前的表现进行了比较,但未来的表现或许更为重要。如果您愿意,可以免费查看分析师对Shake Shack的预测。
What Can We Tell From Shake Shack's ROCE Trend?
我们能从Shake Shack的ROCE趋势中得出什么?
When we looked at the ROCE trend at Shake Shack, we didn't gain much confidence. Around five years ago the returns on capital were 3.8%, but since then they've fallen to 1.8%. Although, given both revenue and the amount of assets employed in the business have increased, it could suggest the company is investing in growth, and the extra capital has led to a short-term reduction in ROCE. And if the increased capital generates additional returns, the business, and thus shareholders, will benefit in the long run.
当我们观察Shake Shack的ROCE趋势时,我们并没有获得太多信心。大约五年前,资本回报率为3.8%,但自那以来已降至1.8%。尽管如此,考虑到营业收入和用于业务的资产都在增加,这可能表明公司正在投资于增长,而额外的资本导致了ROCE的短期下降。如果增加的资本能够产生额外的回报,那么业务及其股东将在长期受益。
The Bottom Line
总结
Even though returns on capital have fallen in the short term, we find it promising that revenue and capital employed have both increased for Shake Shack. And the stock has done incredibly well with a 116% return over the last five years, so long term investors are no doubt ecstatic with that result. So while the underlying trends could already be accounted for by investors, we still think this stock is worth looking into further.
即使短期内资本回报率下降,我们发现Shake Shack的营业收入和所用资本均有所增加,这令人感到鼓舞。在过去五年中,股票的表现非常出色,回报率达到116%,因此长期投资者无疑对这一结果感到非常满意。因此,尽管基本趋势可能已经被投资者考虑在内,但我们仍然认为这只股票值得进一步关注。
One more thing to note, we've identified 1 warning sign with Shake Shack and understanding it should be part of your investment process.
还有一件事要注意,我们发现Shake Shack有1个警告信号,了解这一点应该是您投资过程的一部分。
For those who like to invest in solid companies, check out this free list of companies with solid balance sheets and high returns on equity.
对于喜欢投资于稳健公司的投资者,可以查看这个免费的稳健资产负债表和高股本回报率公司的列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。