The Returns At Oxford Industries (NYSE:OXM) Aren't Growing
The Returns At Oxford Industries (NYSE:OXM) Aren't Growing
If we want to find a stock that could multiply over the long term, what are the underlying trends we should look for? Firstly, we'd want to identify a growing return on capital employed (ROCE) and then alongside that, an ever-increasing base of capital employed. Ultimately, this demonstrates that it's a business that is reinvesting profits at increasing rates of return. Having said that, from a first glance at Oxford Industries (NYSE:OXM) we aren't jumping out of our chairs at how returns are trending, but let's have a deeper look.
如果我们想找到一个可以长期增长的股票,我们应该寻找哪些基本趋势?首先,我们需要识别出一个不断增长的资本回报率(ROCE),同时还有一个不断增加的资本使用基础。最终,这表明这是一个以不断提高的回报率再投资利润的业务。也就是说,从对牛津工业(纽交所:OXM)的初步观察来看,我们对回报趋势并没有感到特别兴奋,但让我们深入看看。
Return On Capital Employed (ROCE): What Is It?
资本回报率(ROCE):它是什么?
For those who don't know, ROCE is a measure of a company's yearly pre-tax profit (its return), relative to the capital employed in the business. The formula for this calculation on Oxford Industries is:
对于那些不知道的人来说,ROCE是公司的年度税前利润(其回报)与业务中使用的资本之间的关系。牛津工业的计算公式是:
Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)
资本利用率 = 利息和税前利润(EBIT) ÷ (总资产 - 流动负债)
0.13 = US$132m ÷ (US$1.2b - US$217m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to November 2024).
0.13 = 13200万美元 ÷ (12亿 - 2.17亿)(基于截至2024年11月的过去十二个月)。
Therefore, Oxford Industries has an ROCE of 13%. That's a pretty standard return and it's in line with the industry average of 13%.
因此,牛津工业的ROCE为13%。这是相当标准的回报,符合行业平均水平13%。
In the above chart we have measured Oxford Industries' prior ROCE against its prior performance, but the future is arguably more important. If you'd like to see what analysts are forecasting going forward, you should check out our free analyst report for Oxford Industries .
在上面的图表中,我们测量了牛津工业之前的资本回报率(ROCE)与其之前的表现,但未来的重要性或许更大。如果您想了解分析师对牛津工业未来的预测,您应该查看我们免费的分析师报告。
So How Is Oxford Industries' ROCE Trending?
那么,牛津工业的资本回报率(ROCE)走势如何?
There hasn't been much to report for Oxford Industries' returns and its level of capital employed because both metrics have been steady for the past five years. It's not uncommon to see this when looking at a mature and stable business that isn't re-investing its earnings because it has likely passed that phase of the business cycle. So unless we see a substantial change at Oxford Industries in terms of ROCE and additional investments being made, we wouldn't hold our breath on it being a multi-bagger. This probably explains why Oxford Industries is paying out 46% of its income to shareholders in the form of dividends. Given the business isn't reinvesting in itself, it makes sense to distribute a portion of earnings among shareholders.
过去五年来,牛津工业的收益和资本使用水平没有太多变化,因为这两个指标一直保持稳定。在观察一个成熟而稳定的业务时,这种情况并不罕见,因为它可能已经过了重新投资收益的阶段。因此,除非我们看到牛津工业在资本回报率(ROCE)和额外投资方面发生重大变化,否则我们不太寄希望于它成为一个多倍回报的投资。这也许能够解释为什么牛津工业将其收入的46%以分红派息的形式支付给股东。考虑到该业务并没有自我再投资,向股东分配部分收益是有意义的。
Our Take On Oxford Industries' ROCE
我们对牛津工业资本回报率(ROCE)的看法
In summary, Oxford Industries isn't compounding its earnings but is generating stable returns on the same amount of capital employed. Unsurprisingly, the stock has only gained 20% over the last five years, which potentially indicates that investors are accounting for this going forward. Therefore, if you're looking for a multi-bagger, we'd propose looking at other options.
总而言之,牛津工业并没有复利增加其收益,而是在使用同样的资本下产生稳定的回报。毫无疑问,这只股票在过去五年中仅上涨了20%,这可能表明投资者已经考虑到这一点。因此,如果您正在寻找一个多倍回报的投资,我们建议您考虑其他期权。
If you'd like to know about the risks facing Oxford Industries, we've discovered 3 warning signs that you should be aware of.
如果您想了解牛津工业面临的风险,我们发现了3个您需要注意的警告信号。
If you want to search for solid companies with great earnings, check out this free list of companies with good balance sheets and impressive returns on equity.
如果您想寻找具有良好收益的稳健公司,可以查看这份拥有良好资产负债表和令人印象深刻的股本回报率的免费公司列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。