Individual Investors Who Hold 57% of Dynamic Holdings Limited (HKG:29) Gained 22%, Insiders Profited as Well
Individual Investors Who Hold 57% of Dynamic Holdings Limited (HKG:29) Gained 22%, Insiders Profited as Well
Key Insights
关键洞察
- Dynamic Holdings' significant individual investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- A total of 8 investors have a majority stake in the company with 43% ownership
- Insiders own 43% of Dynamic Holdings
- 动态控股的重大个人投资者持股表明,关键决策受到更广大股东的影响。
- 共有8位投资者在该公司中拥有43%的控股权。
- 内部人士持有动态控股43%的股份。
A look at the shareholders of Dynamic Holdings Limited (HKG:29) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual investors with 57% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
观察动态控股有限公司(HKG:29)的股东可以告诉我们哪个群体最强大。持有最大份额的群体是个人投资者,拥有57%的股份。这意味着,如果股票上涨,该群体将获益最多(或者在市场下行时损失最多)。
Individual investors gained the most after market cap touched HK$2.5b last week, while insiders who own 43% also benefitted.
个别投资者在市值达到25亿港元后获得了最大的收益,而持有43%的内部人士也同样受益。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Dynamic Holdings.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东可以告诉我们有关动态控股的信息。
What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Dynamic Holdings?
缺乏机构持股对动态控股意味着什么?
We don't tend to see institutional investors holding stock of companies that are very risky, thinly traded, or very small. Though we do sometimes see large companies without institutions on the register, it's not particularly common.
我们通常不看到机构投资者持有非常风险高、流动性低或非常小的公司的股票。尽管我们有时会看到没有机构注册的大公司,但这并不常见。
There are multiple explanations for why institutions don't own a stock. The most common is that the company is too small relative to funds under management, so the institution does not bother to look closely at the company. On the other hand, it's always possible that professional investors are avoiding a company because they don't think it's the best place for their money. Institutional investors may not find the historic growth of the business impressive, or there might be other factors at play. You can see the past revenue performance of Dynamic Holdings, for yourself, below.
机构不持有某只股票的原因有多种解释。最常见的原因是公司相对于管理的资金规模太小,因此机构不会仔细关注该公司。另一方面,专业投资者可能在规避某家公司,因为他们认为这不是投资的最佳选择。机构投资者可能并不认为这家公司的历史增长令人印象深刻,或者可能还有其他因素在起作用。您可以在下面看到动态控股过去营业收入的表现。
Dynamic Holdings is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is Domingo Chua, with ownership of 39%. The second and third largest shareholders are Lucio Tan and Carmen Tan, with an equal amount of shares to their name at 0.9%. Interestingly, the bottom two of the top three shareholders also hold the title of Top Key Executive and Member of the Board of Directors, respectively, suggesting that these insiders have a personal stake in the company.
动态控股并不被对冲基金拥有。公司的最大股东是Domingo Chua,持有39%的股份。第二和第三大股东分别是Lucio Tan和Carmen Tan,他们持有相等的股份,均为0.9%。有趣的是,前三大股东中排名最后的两位还担任董事会成员和高级关键执行官的职称,这表明这些内部人士对公司有个人投资。
A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 8 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.
更深入地查看我们的股权数据,前8大股东共持有不到一半的股份,表明存在一大群小股东,且没有单一股东拥有大多数股份。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.
虽然研究一个公司的机构所有权可以为你的研究增加价值,但同时研究分析师的推荐也是一个很好的做法,以更深入了解股票的预期表现。我们提供的信息表明该股票没有分析师的覆盖,因而可能知名度不高。
Insider Ownership Of Dynamic Holdings
动态控股的内部持股
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司内部人士的定义可能是主观的,并在不同法域之间有所不同。我们的数据显示个人内部人士,至少捕获了董事会成员。公司管理层对董事会负责,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员本身就是董事会成员。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部持股是积极的,因为这表明董事会与其他股东保持良好的一致性。然而,在某些情况下,权力在这个群体中过于集中。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Dynamic Holdings Limited. It has a market capitalization of just HK$2.5b, and insiders have HK$1.1b worth of shares in their own names. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我们的信息显示,内部人士在动态控股有限公司持有相当大的股份。其市值仅为25亿港元,而内部人士名下的股份价值为11亿港元。我们认为这表明与股东的利益一致,但值得注意的是,该公司仍然相当小;某些内部人士可能是公司创始人。您可以点击这里查看这些内部人士是否在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
公众持股
The general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, collectively holds 57% of Dynamic Holdings shares. This level of ownership gives investors from the wider public some power to sway key policy decisions such as board composition, executive compensation, and the dividend payout ratio.
一般公众,主要由个人投资者组成,集体持有动态控股57%的股份。这种所有权水平赋予了来自更广泛公众的投资者一定的权力,以影响关键政策决策,如董事会组成、管理层薪酬和股息支付比例。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Dynamic Holdings that you should be aware of before investing here.
虽然考虑拥有一家公司的不同群体是非常值得的,但还有其他因素更为重要。举例来说,我们发现了1个关于动态控股的警告信号,在您投资之前应该了解这一点。
Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.
当然,这可能不是买入的最佳股票。因此,您可能希望查看我们免费的有趣前景集合,拥有良好的财务状况。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。