Institutional Owners May Take Dramatic Actions as Shanghai Bolex Food Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:603170) Recent 8.6% Drop Adds to One-year Losses
Institutional Owners May Take Dramatic Actions as Shanghai Bolex Food Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:603170) Recent 8.6% Drop Adds to One-year Losses
Key Insights
关键洞察
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Shanghai Bolex Food Technology's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- 57% of the business is held by the top 3 shareholders
- Insider ownership in Shanghai Bolex Food Technology is 18%
- 显著高的机构持股意味着上海博乐克食品科技的股价对他们的交易行为敏感
- 57%的业务由前3大股东持有
- 上海博乐克食品科技的内部持股为18%
A look at the shareholders of Shanghai Bolex Food Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603170) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 34% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
查看上海博乐克食品科技有限公司(SHSE:603170)的股东可以告诉我们哪个集团最强大。持有最大份额的集团是机构,拥有34%的股份。换句话说,该集团面临最高的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
As a result, institutional investors endured the highest losses last week after market cap fell by CN¥584m. The recent loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 2.6% for stockholders, may not sit well with this group of investors. Also referred to as "smart money", institutions have a lot of sway over how a stock's price moves. As a result, if the downtrend continues, institutions may face pressures to sell Shanghai Bolex Food Technology, which might have negative implications on individual investors.
因此,上周机构投资者遭受了最高的损失,因为市值下降了人民币58400万。这一损失,加上股东一年内的2.6%的损失,可能让这一群体的投资者感到不满。 这些机构被称为“聪明的钱”,它们在股票价格变动中具有很大的影响力。因此,如果下跌趋势持续,机构可能会面临卖出上海博乐食品科技的压力,这可能对个人投资者产生负面影响。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Shanghai Bolex Food Technology.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于上海博乐食品科技的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shanghai Bolex Food Technology?
机构持股对我们了解上海博乐食品科技有什么启示?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构的表现与近似当地市场的指数进行比较。因此,他们通常更加关注那些被纳入主要指数的公司。
We can see that Shanghai Bolex Food Technology does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Shanghai Bolex Food Technology's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我们可以看到上海博乐食品科技确实有机构投资者;他们持有公司相当一部分的股票。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经查看了这只股票,并且他们喜欢它。但就像其他人一样,他们也可能会错。如果多个机构同时改变对某只股票的看法,你可能会看到股价快速下跌。因此,看看以下上海博乐食品科技的盈利历史是值得的。当然,未来才是真正重要的。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Shanghai Bolex Food Technology. Our data shows that Genial Flow Asset Management Co.,Ltd. is the largest shareholder with 31% of shares outstanding. Ju Ma is the second largest shareholder owning 18% of common stock, and Hangzhou Baoyu Investment Management Partnership Enterprise (Limited Partnership) holds about 9.0% of the company stock.
对冲基金在上海博莱克食品科技中的股份不多。我们的数据显示,Genial Flow 资产管理有限公司是最大的股东,持有31%的流通股份。贾马是第二大股东,拥有18%的普通股票,而杭州宝宇投资管理合伙企业(有限合伙)持有约9.0%的公司股票。
A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 3 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 57% stake.
对股东登记册的更详细研究显示,三位顶级股东通过57%的持股量在公司中拥有相当大的所有权。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究机构的所有权是评估和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。分析师情绪的研究也可以达到同样的效果。有很多分析师在覆盖该股票,因此查看他们的预期可能也是值得的。
Insider Ownership Of Shanghai Bolex Food Technology
上海博莱克食品科技的内部持股
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
虽然内部人的精确定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员都是内部人。管理层最终要向董事会负责。然而,管理者成为执行董事会成员并不罕见,尤其是在他们是创始人或首席执行官的情况下。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人拥有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情况下,这使得其他股东更难让董事会对决策负责。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Shanghai Bolex Food Technology Co., Ltd.. Insiders own CN¥1.1b worth of shares in the CN¥6.2b company. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.
insiders似乎拥有上海博乐士食品科技有限公司相当大的股份。内部人士持有价值11亿人民币的股份,公司的市值为62亿人民币。看到内部人士如此投入于业务真是太好了。可能值得查看一下这些内部人士最近是否有买入。
General Public Ownership
公众持股
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 32% stake in Shanghai Bolex Food Technology. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
公众,通常是个体投资者,持有上海博乐士食品科技32%的股份。尽管这个股份的大小相当可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同,可能不足以改变公司的政策。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司所有权
It seems that Private Companies own 16%, of the Shanghai Bolex Food Technology stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
似乎私人公司持有上海博乐食品科技的16%股票。单凭这一事实很难得出任何结论,因此值得调查一下这些私人公司的持有人。有时内部人士或其他相关方通过另一家私人公司对一家上市公司持有股份。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Shanghai Bolex Food Technology that you should be aware of before investing here.
虽然考虑拥有公司的不同群体是非常重要的,但还有其他因素更为重要。例如,我们发现了一个关于上海博乐食品科技的警告信号,在您在这里投资之前应当注意。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最终,未来是最重要的。您可以访问此免费的关于公司分析师预测的报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。