Institutional Owners May Consider Drastic Measures as Brighthouse Financial, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:BHF) Recent US$96m Drop Adds to Long-term Losses
Institutional Owners May Consider Drastic Measures as Brighthouse Financial, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:BHF) Recent US$96m Drop Adds to Long-term Losses
Key Insights
关键洞察
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Brighthouse Financial's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- The top 8 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 机构高比例的持股意味着股东交易对Brighthouse Financial的股价影响很大
- 前八大股东持有公司50%的股份
- 分析师的预测以及持有数据有助于强烈理解业务的前景
If you want to know who really controls Brighthouse Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ:BHF), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 81% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
如果你想知道谁真正控制Brighthouse Financial, Inc. (纳斯达克:BHF),那么你需要查看其股东名册的构成。 持有公司最多股份的群体,准确来说大约是81%,是机构。 换句话说,这个群体面临着最大的上涨潜力(或下跌风险)。
And institutional investors saw their holdings value drop by 3.2% last week. The recent loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 10% for stockholders, may not sit well with this group of investors. Also referred to as "smart money", institutions have a lot of sway over how a stock's price moves. As a result, if the decline continues, institutional investors may be pressured to sell Brighthouse Financial which might hurt individual investors.
机构投资者上周看到其持有的价值下降了3.2%。最近的损失,加上股东一年的损失达10%,可能让这一组投资者感到不满。机构也被称为“聪明的钱”,对股票价格的波动有很大影响。因此,如果下降持续,机构投资者可能会受到压力出售Brighthouse Financial,这可能会伤害到个人投资者。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Brighthouse Financial, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入探讨Brighthouse Financial每种类型的所有者,从下面的图表开始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Brighthouse Financial?
机构持股比例对Brighthouse Financial有什么提示?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构的表现与近似当地市场的指数进行比较。因此,他们通常更加关注那些被纳入主要指数的公司。
We can see that Brighthouse Financial does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Brighthouse Financial's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我们可以看到Brighthouse Financial确实有机构投资者,并且他们持有该公司相当大一部分的股票。这在专业投资者中暗示了一定的可信度。但是我们不能仅依赖这一事实,因为机构有时也会做出糟糕的投资,就像其他人一样。当多个机构拥有一只股票时,总是存在“拥挤交易”的风险。当这样的交易出现问题时,多个方可能会竞争快速出售股票。在没有增长历史的公司中,这一风险更高。你可以在下面看到Brighthouse Financial的历史盈利和营业收入,但请记住,事情总是有其更深层次的原因。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Brighthouse Financial is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Dodge & Cox with 11% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 10% and 9.7% of the stock.
投资者应注意,机构实际拥有超过一半的公司股份,因此他们可以团结起来拥有 significant 的权力。 Brighthouse Financial 并不被对冲基金拥有。 从我们的数据来看,最大的股东是 Dodge & Cox,持有11%的流通股份。 相比之下,第二和第三大股东分别持有约10%和9.7%的股票。
We also observed that the top 8 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.
我们还观察到,前8大股东占据了超过一半的股份登记,几个较小的股东在一定程度上平衡了较大股东的利益。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究机构的所有权是评估和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。分析师情绪的研究也可以达到同样的效果。有很多分析师在覆盖该股票,因此查看他们的预期可能也是值得的。
Insider Ownership Of Brighthouse Financial
Brighthouse Financial的内部股东持股情况
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司内部人士的定义可能是主观的,并在不同法域之间有所不同。我们的数据显示个人内部人士,至少捕获了董事会成员。公司管理层对董事会负责,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员本身就是董事会成员。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部持股显示领导层像真正的公司所有者一样思考时,这是积极的。然而,高比例的内部持股也可能给予公司内部小团体巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Brighthouse Financial, Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around US$28m worth of shares (at current prices). Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我们最新的数据表明,内部人士持有 Brighthouse Financial, Inc. 少于 1% 的股份。这是一家相当大的公司,因此董事会成员拥有公司具有意义的股份是可能的,即使他们的比例股份不高。在这种情况下,他们拥有大约2800万美元的股票(按当前价格计算)。可以说,最近的买入和卖出同样重要。您可以点击这里查看内部人士是否有买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
公众持股
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 17% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公众——包括散户投资者——在该公司拥有17%的股份,因此不能轻易被忽视。虽然这个群体并不一定能决定大局,但它确实可以对公司的运行产生实际影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.
我觉得研究到底是谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正获得洞察,我们还需要考虑其他信息。
Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.
许多人发现深入分析公司过去的表现很有用。您可以访问这一详细的历史营业收入、营业收入和现金流的图表。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最终,未来是最重要的。您可以访问此免费的关于公司分析师预测的报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。