share_log

Institutional Owners May Ignore Enterprise Financial Services Corp's (NASDAQ:EFSC) Recent US$118m Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green

Institutional Owners May Ignore Enterprise Financial Services Corp's (NASDAQ:EFSC) Recent US$118m Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green

机构投资者可能会忽视Enterprise Financial Services Corp(纳斯达克:EFSC)最近11800万美元市值的下降,因为长期利润依然保持增长。
Simply Wall St ·  2024/12/24 08:53

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Enterprise Financial Services' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • The top 11 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 鉴于机构持有该股的大量股份,企业金融服务的股价可能容易受到其交易决策的影响
  • 前 11 名股东拥有公司 50% 的股份
  • 内部人士最近一直在抛售

Every investor in Enterprise Financial Services Corp (NASDAQ:EFSC) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 78% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

企业金融服务公司(纳斯达克股票代码:EFSC)的每位投资者都应该知道最强大的股东群体。机构拥有78%的股份,是公司的最大股份。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

Institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$2.1b last week. However, the 29% one-year return to shareholders might have softened the blow. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.

上周该公司的市值跌至21亿美元后,机构投资者是受影响最大的群体。但是,29%的股东一年回报率可能减轻了打击。但是,他们应该注意将来的进一步损失。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Enterprise Financial Services, beginning with the chart below.

让我们从下图开始,深入研究企业金融服务的每种类型的所有者。

big
NasdaqGS:EFSC Ownership Breakdown December 24th 2024
纳斯达克GS:EFSC所有权明细 2024年12月24日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Enterprise Financial Services?

关于企业金融服务,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构在向自己的投资者报告时通常会根据基准来衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会变得更加热情。我们预计大多数公司都会注册一些机构,尤其是在它们成长的情况下。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Enterprise Financial Services. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Enterprise Financial Services, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

如您所见,机构投资者在企业金融服务中拥有相当数量的股份。这可能表明该公司在投资界具有一定程度的信誉。但是,最好谨慎地依赖机构投资者所谓的验证。他们有时也会弄错。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得查看企业金融服务过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

big
NasdaqGS:EFSC Earnings and Revenue Growth December 24th 2024
纳斯达克GS:EFSC收益和收入增长 2024年12月24日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Enterprise Financial Services is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc., with ownership of 11%. With 9.5% and 5.8% of the shares outstanding respectively, Wellington Management Group LLP and Dimensional Fund Advisors LP are the second and third largest shareholders.

投资者应注意,机构实际上拥有公司一半以上的股份,因此它们可以共同行使巨大的权力。企业金融服务不归对冲基金所有。该公司的最大股东是贝莱德公司,所有权为11%。惠灵顿管理集团有限责任公司和Dimensional Fund Advisors LP分别拥有9.5%和5.8%的已发行股份,是第二和第三大股东。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 11 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

仔细观察我们的所有权数据后发现,前11名股东的总所有权为50%,这意味着没有一个股东占多数。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以实现同样的目标。有合理数量的分析师报道该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体看法可能会很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Enterprise Financial Services

企业金融服务的内部所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同国家对内部人士的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是计算在内。公司管理层对董事会的回答,董事会应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也在董事会中。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Enterprise Financial Services Corp. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$38m. Most would see this as a real positive. If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

股东们可能会有兴趣了解内部人士拥有企业金融服务公司的股份。内部人士拥有价值3,800万美元的大量股份。大多数人会认为这是一个真正的积极因素。如果您想探讨内幕调整问题,可以点击此处查看内部人士是否在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

普通公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 20% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

公众——包括散户投资者——拥有该公司20%的股份,因此不容忽视。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Enterprise Financial Services better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Enterprise Financial Services that you should be aware of before investing here.

拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得考虑的。但是,要更好地了解企业金融服务,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如,我们发现了企业金融服务的一个警告信号,您在投资之前应注意这一点。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你想了解分析师对未来增长的预测,千万不要错过这份关于分析师预测的免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后日期的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?担心内容吗?直接联系我们。或者,发送电子邮件给编辑组(网址为)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并非旨在提供财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。华尔街只是没有持有上述任何股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发