First Financial Bancorp.'s (NASDAQ:FFBC) Institutional Investors Lost 4.2% Over the Past Week but Have Profited From Longer-term Gains
First Financial Bancorp.'s (NASDAQ:FFBC) Institutional Investors Lost 4.2% Over the Past Week but Have Profited From Longer-term Gains
Key Insights
关键洞察
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies First Financial Bancorp's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- The top 8 shareholders own 51% of the company
- Insiders have been selling lately
- 显著较高的机构持股意味着第一金融银行的股票价格对其交易行为很敏感
- 前8大股东拥有公司51%的股份。
- 内部人士最近一直在卖出。
If you want to know who really controls First Financial Bancorp. (NASDAQ:FFBC), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 80% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果你想知道谁真正控制了第一金融银行(纳斯达克:FFBC),那么你需要查看其股票登记的构成。而持有最大份额的群体是拥有80%股份的机构。换句话说,该群体的投资在公司中面临的收益最大(或损失最大)。
No shareholder likes losing money on their investments, especially institutional investors who saw their holdings drop 4.2% in value last week. However, the 18% one-year return to shareholders may have helped lessen their pain. But they would probably be wary of future losses.
没有股东喜欢在投资中亏损,尤其是那些看到自己持股价值在上周下降了4.2%的机构投资者。然而,对股东而言,一年回报18%可能帮助减轻了他们的痛苦。但他们可能会对未来的亏损感到谨慎。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of First Financial Bancorp.
在下图中,我们聚焦于第一金融银行的不同股东群体。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About First Financial Bancorp?
机构持股对First Financial Bancorp的启示是什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与一个常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买纳入相关基准指数的大型公司股票。
First Financial Bancorp already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see First Financial Bancorp's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
第一金融银行已在股票登记册上拥有机构。实际上,他们在公司中拥有可观的股份。这表明该公司在投资社区中具有一定的可信度。然而,依赖机构投资者所带来的所谓验证时,最好保持谨慎。他们有时也会犯错。当多个机构持有同一只股票时,总是存在他们参与了一个“拥挤交易”的风险。当这样的交易出现问题时,多个方可能会竞争快速卖出股票。对于没有增长历史的公司,这种风险更高。您可以在下方查看第一金融银行的历史盈利和营业收入,但请记住事情总是有更多的故事。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in First Financial Bancorp. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 15% of shares outstanding. With 11% and 7.0% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and Dimensional Fund Advisors LP are the second and third largest shareholders.
投资者应该注意,机构实际上拥有超过一半的公司,因此他们可以共同施加重大影响力。对第一金融银行来说,对冲基金并没有持有很多股票。贝莱德目前是该公司最大的股东,拥有15%的流通股。先锋集团公司和维度基金顾问公司分别以11%和7.0%的流通股占比位居第二和第三大股东。
We did some more digging and found that 8 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.
我们进行了更多的挖掘,发现前8大股东大约占登记的51%,这意味着除了较大的股东外,还有一些较小的股东,从而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究一家公司的机构持有情况可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的推荐也是一个好的做法,以更深入地了解股票的预期表现。许多分析师在跟踪这只股票,因此也值得看看他们的预测。
Insider Ownership Of First Financial Bancorp
First Financial Bancorp的内部持股情况
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
内部人的定义在不同国家之间可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是算作内部人。公司管理层负责运营业务,但首席执行官将向董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会的成员。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部持股是积极的,因为这表明董事会与其他股东保持良好的一致性。然而,在某些情况下,权力在这个群体中过于集中。
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in First Financial Bancorp.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$57m. Most would see this as a real positive. If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
股东们可能会感兴趣地了解到,内部人士拥有第一金融银行的股份。内部人士持有的股份总值为5700万美元。大多数人会将其视为一个真正的积极因素。如果您想探讨内部人士的利益一致性问题,可以点击这里查看内部人士是否在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
公众持股
With a 18% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over First Financial Bancorp. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公众持有18%的股份,主要由个人投资者组成,对第一金融银行拥有一定的影响力。虽然这种规模的持股可能不足以影响政策决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that First Financial Bancorp is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...
虽然考虑不同的集团拥有公司的情况非常重要,但还有其他因素更为关键。请注意,第一金融银行在我们的投资分析中显示出2个警告信号,您应该了解...
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最终,未来是最重要的。您可以访问此免费的关于公司分析师预测的报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。