With 1.3% One-year Returns, Institutional Owners May Ignore Independent Bank Corp.'s (NASDAQ:INDB) 4.9% Stock Price Decline
With 1.3% One-year Returns, Institutional Owners May Ignore Independent Bank Corp.'s (NASDAQ:INDB) 4.9% Stock Price Decline
Key Insights
关键洞察
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Independent Bank's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- The top 11 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 由于机构在股票中的大额持仓,美国独立银行的股价可能会受到他们交易决策的影响。
- 前11大股东持有公司50%的股份。
- 分析师的预测以及持有数据有助于强烈理解业务的前景
A look at the shareholders of Independent Bank Corp. (NASDAQ:INDB) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 82% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
查看美国独立银行CORP(纳斯达克:INDB)的股东可以告诉我们哪个群体最有权力。持有最大份额的是机构,拥有82%的股份。也就是说,如果股价上涨,该群体能够获得最多的收益(或者在下跌时损失最多)。
No shareholder likes losing money on their investments, especially institutional investors who saw their holdings drop 4.9% in value last week. However, the 1.3% one-year return to shareholders may have helped lessen their pain. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.
没有股东喜欢在投资中亏损,尤其是那些上周看到其持有股份价值下降4.9%的机构投资者。然而,1.3%的年回报可能帮助减轻了他们的痛苦。然而,他们应该意识到未来可能会有进一步的损失。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Independent Bank.
在下面的图表中,我们聚焦于美国独立银行的不同股东群体。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Independent Bank?
机构所有权告诉我们什么关于美国独立银行?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与一个常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买纳入相关基准指数的大型公司股票。
We can see that Independent Bank does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Independent Bank's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我们可以看到美国独立银行确实有机构投资者,他们持有公司股票的一大部分。这在专业投资者中表明了一定的信誉。但我们不能仅仅依赖这一事实,因为机构有时也会做出错误的投资,就像其他人一样。当多个机构持有同一只股票时,总是存在他们处于“拥挤交易”的风险。当这样的交易出现问题时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。如果在一家没有成长历史的公司,这种风险更高。你可以在下面看到美国独立银行的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住往往还有更多的故事。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Independent Bank. The company's largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc., with ownership of 15%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 12% and 5.4%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
机构投资者拥有超过50%的公司股份,因此他们可以共同强有力地影响董事会决策。我们注意到对美国独立银行的对冲基金没有重大投资。该公司的最大股东是贝莱德公司,持有15%的股份。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有12%和5.4%的流通股份。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 11 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
更仔细地看我们的所有权数字,前11大股东的综合持股比例为50%,这意味着没有单一股东拥有多数股份。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
研究机构的持股是一种很好的方式,可以评估和筛选股票的预期表现。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以实现同样的目标。相当多的分析师覆盖了这只股票,您可以很容易地查找预测增长。
Insider Ownership Of Independent Bank
美国独立银行的内部人持股情况
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司内部人员的定义可能具有主观性,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少包括董事会成员。管理层最终需要对董事会负责。然而,管理者成为执行董事会成员并不罕见,尤其是在他们是创始人或CEO的情况下。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部持股是积极的,因为这表明董事会与其他股东保持良好的一致性。然而,在某些情况下,权力在这个群体中过于集中。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Independent Bank Corp. in their own names. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own US$23m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我们的数据显示,内部人士自名下持有美国独立银行CORP不到1%的股份。请记住,这是一家大公司,内部人士持有2300万美元的股票。绝对值可能比比例份额更重要。可以说,最近的买入和卖出同样值得考虑。您可以点击此处查看内部人士是否有买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
公众持股
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 17% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公众——包括散户投资者——在该公司拥有17%的股份,因此不能轻易被忽视。虽然这个群体并不一定能决定大局,但它确实可以对公司的运行产生实际影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.
我觉得研究到底是谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正获得洞察,我们还需要考虑其他信息。
Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.
许多人发现深入分析公司过去的表现很有用。您可以访问这一详细的历史营业收入、营业收入和现金流的图表。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最终,未来是最重要的。您可以访问此免费的关于公司分析师预测的报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。