share_log

In Spite of Recent Selling, Insiders Still Control 40% of Samsara Inc. (NYSE:IOT)

In Spite of Recent Selling, Insiders Still Control 40% of Samsara Inc. (NYSE:IOT)

尽管近期有卖出,内部人士仍然控制着萨姆萨拉公司(纽交所:物联网)40%的股份。
Simply Wall St ·  2024/12/25 04:50

Key Insights

关键洞察

  • Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Samsara's growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
  • 52% of the business is held by the top 4 shareholders
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 内部人士似乎对Samsara的增长有既得利益,因为他们拥有相当可观的股份。
  • 前四大股东持有52%的股份。
  • 高管近期的卖出行为

A look at the shareholders of Samsara Inc. (NYSE:IOT) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 40% to be precise, is individual insiders. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

查看Samsara Inc.(纽交所:IOT)的股东可以告诉我们哪个群体最有影响力。 持有公司最多股份的群体,大约占40%,确切地说,是个人内部人士。 换句话说,这个群体在其对公司的投资中,最有可能获得最大收益(或承受最大损失)。

And insiders own the top position in the company's share registry despite recent sales.

尽管最近有出售,但内部人士在公司的股东名册中仍拥有最高地位。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Samsara.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能够告诉我们关于Samsara的信息。

big
NYSE:IOT Ownership Breakdown December 25th 2024
纽交所:物联网 所有权分解 2024年12月25日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Samsara?

机构所有权告诉我们关于Samsara什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与一个常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买纳入相关基准指数的大型公司股票。

Samsara already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Samsara's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

Samsara已经在股份登记上有了机构。实际上,他们在公司中拥有可观的股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经审视了这只股票并对其表示认可。但和其他人一样,他们也可能会出错。如果多个机构同时改变对一只股票的看法,你可能会看到股价迅速下跌。因此,查看下面Samsara的盈利历史是值得的。当然,未来才是最重要的。

big
NYSE:IOT Earnings and Revenue Growth December 25th 2024
纽交所:物联网2024年12月25日的收益与营业收入增长

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Samsara. With a 19% stake, CEO Sanjit Biswas is the largest shareholder. With 18% and 9.3% of the shares outstanding respectively, John Bicket and Andreessen Horowitz LLC are the second and third largest shareholders. Interestingly, the second-largest shareholder, John Bicket is also Top Key Executive, again, pointing towards strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.

对冲基金在Samsara的股份不多。CEO Sanjit Biswas持有19%的股份,是最大股东。John Bicket和Andreessen Horowitz LLC分别持有18%和9.3%的流通股份,是第二和第三大股东。有趣的是,第二大股东John Bicket也是公司的高层管理人员,再次表明公司的主要股东中有着强大的内部持股情况。

Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 52% of the company is controlled by the top 4 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.

我们的研究还揭示了一个事实,即公司约52%的股份由前四大股东控制,这表明这些股东在业务上具有重要影响力。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

虽然研究一家公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解市场趋势同样也是有意义的。现在有相当多的分析师关注这只股票,因此了解他们对未来的整体看法可能会很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Samsara

Samsara的内部持股情况

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司内部人士的定义可能是主观的,并在不同法域之间有所不同。我们的数据显示个人内部人士,至少捕获了董事会成员。公司管理层对董事会负责,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员本身就是董事会成员。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人拥有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情况下,这使得其他股东更难让董事会对决策负责。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Samsara Inc.. Insiders own US$10b worth of shares in the US$26b company. That's quite meaningful. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

内部人士似乎拥有Samsara Inc.公司的相当大比例股份。内部人士在这家价值260亿美元的公司中拥有价值100亿美元的股份。这是相当有意义的。看到这样的投资水平真是不错。您可以在这里查看这些内部人士最近是否有买入。

General Public Ownership

公众持股

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 11% stake in Samsara. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

一般公众,通常是个别投资者,持有Samsara 11%的股份。虽然这个持股规模可能不足以影响政策决定,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Private Equity Ownership

股权投资公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力参与塑造以价值创造为重点的公司策略。一些投资者可能会因此而受到鼓舞,因为股权投资公司有时可以鼓励市场看到公司的价值,从而采取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在将其上市后退出投资。

Private equity firms hold a 9.3% stake in Samsara. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

股权投资公司持有Samsara 9.3%的股份。这表明他们对关键政策决策可能有影响力。一些投资者可能会因此受到鼓励,因为股权投资在某些情况下能够推动策略,使市场意识到公司的价值。或者,这些持有者可能是在将公司上市后退出投资。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Samsara better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 3 warning signs we've spotted with Samsara .

考虑公司中不同持股群体总是值得的。但为了更好地理解Samsara,我们需要考虑其他许多因素。为此,您应该注意到我们发现的Samsara的3个警告信号。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最终,未来是最重要的。您可以访问此免费的关于公司分析师预测的报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发