Here's Why We Think Oracle (NYSE:ORCL) Is Well Worth Watching
Here's Why We Think Oracle (NYSE:ORCL) Is Well Worth Watching
It's common for many investors, especially those who are inexperienced, to buy shares in companies with a good story even if these companies are loss-making. Sometimes these stories can cloud the minds of investors, leading them to invest with their emotions rather than on the merit of good company fundamentals. Loss making companies can act like a sponge for capital - so investors should be cautious that they're not throwing good money after bad.
许多投资者,尤其是那些没有经验的投资者,常常购买故事好的公司的股票,即使这些公司是亏损的。有时,这些故事会影响投资者的思维,使他们情感投资,而不是基于公司基本面的良好表现。亏损公司的资金就像海绵一样吸引资本,因此投资者应该谨慎,以免把好钱投入坏项目。
So if this idea of high risk and high reward doesn't suit, you might be more interested in profitable, growing companies, like Oracle (NYSE:ORCL). Even if this company is fairly valued by the market, investors would agree that generating consistent profits will continue to provide Oracle with the means to add long-term value to shareholders.
所以,如果这种高风险高回报的理念不适合你,你可能更喜欢诸如甲骨文(纽交所:ORCL)这样的盈利增长公司。即使这家公司在市场上被合理定价,投资者也会同意,持续产生稳定的利润将继续为甲骨文提供使股东增值的手段。
How Quickly Is Oracle Increasing Earnings Per Share?
甲骨文每股收益的增长速度有多快?
The market is a voting machine in the short term, but a weighing machine in the long term, so you'd expect share price to follow earnings per share (EPS) outcomes eventually. That makes EPS growth an attractive quality for any company. Over the last three years, Oracle has grown EPS by 4.4% per year. While that sort of growth rate isn't anything to write home about, it does show the business is growing.
市场在短期内是投票机,但在长期内是称重机,因此你可以预期股价最终会跟随每股收益(每股收益)的结果。这使得每股收益的增长成为任何公司的一个吸引人的品质。在过去三年中,甲骨文的每股收益年增长率为4.4%。虽然这种增长率不算特别出色,但确实显示了业务在成长。
Careful consideration of revenue growth and earnings before interest and taxation (EBIT) margins can help inform a view on the sustainability of the recent profit growth. Oracle shareholders can take confidence from the fact that EBIT margins are up from 29% to 31%, and revenue is growing. That's great to see, on both counts.
仔细考虑营业收入增长和利息及税前利润(EBIT)利润率可以帮助我们了解最近利润增长的可持续性。甲骨文的股东可以从EBIT利润率从29%上升到31%以及营业收入增长的事实中获得信心。这在两方面都是很好的消息。
You can take a look at the company's revenue and earnings growth trend, in the chart below. Click on the chart to see the exact numbers.
你可以查看下面图表中公司的营业收入和盈利增长趋势。点击图表以查看确切的数字。
You don't drive with your eyes on the rear-view mirror, so you might be more interested in this free report showing analyst forecasts for Oracle's future profits.
您不会把目光放在后视镜上开车,因此您可能更感兴趣于这份免费报告,报告中显示了分析师对甲骨文未来利润的预期。
Are Oracle Insiders Aligned With All Shareholders?
甲骨文内部人士是否与所有股东一致?
Theory would suggest that it's an encouraging sign to see high insider ownership of a company, since it ties company performance directly to the financial success of its management. So those who are interested in Oracle will be delighted to know that insiders have shown their belief, holding a large proportion of the company's shares. Owning 41% of the company, insiders have plenty riding on the performance of the the share price. Shareholders and speculators should be reassured by this kind of alignment, as it suggests the business will be run for the benefit of shareholders. US$198b That level of investment from insiders is nothing to sneeze at.
理论上,看到公司内部人士高比例持股是一个令人鼓舞的迹象,因为这将公司业绩与管理层的财务成功直接联系起来。所以,感兴趣于甲骨文的人会高兴地看到内部人士持有公司相当大比例的股份。内部人士拥有41%的公司股份,他们在股价表现上有很大押注。股东和投机者应该对这种一致性感到放心,因为这表明业务将为股东的利益而经营。1980亿美金,内部人士的投资水平不可小觑。
While it's always good to see some strong conviction in the company from insiders through heavy investment, it's also important for shareholders to ask if management compensation policies are reasonable. Well, based on the CEO pay, you'd argue that they are indeed. The median total compensation for CEOs of companies similar in size to Oracle, with market caps over US$8.0b, is around US$13m.
虽然看到内部人士通过大量投资表现出对公司的强烈信心总是好事,但股东也应问管理层薪酬政策是否合理。根据CEO的薪资,您会认为它们确实合理。甲骨文类似规模公司的CEO的中位数总薪酬,市值超过80亿美金,约为1300万美金。
Oracle's CEO took home a total compensation package worth US$6.5m in the year leading up to May 2024. That seems pretty reasonable, especially given it's below the median for similar sized companies. While the level of CEO compensation shouldn't be the biggest factor in how the company is viewed, modest remuneration is a positive, because it suggests that the board keeps shareholder interests in mind. Generally, arguments can be made that reasonable pay levels attest to good decision-making.
甲骨文的CEO在2024年5月前一年获得了价值650万美元的总薪酬包。这似乎相当合理,特别是考虑到这个数字低于类似规模公司的中位数。虽然CEO薪酬水平不应该是评价公司时最大的因素,但适度的薪酬是一个积极信号,因为这表明董事会关注股东利益。一般而言,可以说合理的薪酬水平证明了良好的决策。
Should You Add Oracle To Your Watchlist?
你应该把甲骨文加入你的自选吗?
One important encouraging feature of Oracle is that it is growing profits. Earnings growth might be the main attraction for Oracle, but the fun does not stop there. With a meaningful level of insider ownership, and reasonable CEO pay, a reasonable mind might conclude that this is one stock worth watching. Even so, be aware that Oracle is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...
甲骨文的一个重要优势是其利润在增长。每股收益的增长可能是甲骨文的主要吸引力,但这还不是全部。凭借着相对较高的内部持股比例和合理的CEO薪酬,一个理智的人可能会得出结论,这是一个值得关注的股票。尽管如此,请注意,甲骨文在我们的投资分析中显示出一个警告信号,你需要了解...
There's always the possibility of doing well buying stocks that are not growing earnings and do not have insiders buying shares. But for those who consider these important metrics, we encourage you to check out companies that do have those features. You can access a tailored list of companies which have demonstrated growth backed by significant insider holdings.
总是有可能通过购买未能增长收益且没有内部人士购买股份的股票而获得良好回报。但对于那些认为这些指标重要的人,我们鼓励你关注那些具有这些特征的公司。你可以访问一份定制的公司列表,这些公司已经展示出由重要内部持股支持的增长。
Please note the insider transactions discussed in this article refer to reportable transactions in the relevant jurisdiction.
请注意,本文讨论的内部交易是指在相关管辖区内可报告的交易。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。