share_log

Nanfang Zhongjin Environment Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300145) Biggest Owners Are Individual Investors Who Got Richer After Stock Soared 9.0% Last Week

Nanfang Zhongjin Environment Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300145) Biggest Owners Are Individual Investors Who Got Richer After Stock Soared 9.0% Last Week

南方中金环境有限公司(SZSE:300145)最大股东是个人投资者,他们在上周股价上涨9.0%后变得更加富有。
Simply Wall St ·  12/26 09:56

Key Insights

关键洞察

  • Nanfang Zhongjin Environment's significant individual investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • 43% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
  • Insider ownership in Nanfang Zhongjin Environment is 14%
  • 中金环境的重大个人投资者持股表明,关键决策受到更大公众股东的影响。
  • 前25大股东持有43%的股份
  • 中金环境的内部持股为14%。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Nanfang Zhongjin Environment Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300145), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 56% to be precise, is individual investors. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

要了解谁真正控制中金环境有限公司(SZSE:300145),理解该公司的股权结构是很重要的。持有公司最多股份的群体大约是56%,具体来说,是个人投资者。换句话说,这个群体面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

Clearly, individual investors benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by CN¥592m last week.

显然,个别投资者在公司市值上周增长了59200万人民币后受益最大。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Nanfang Zhongjin Environment.

在下面的图表中,我们放大了中金环境的不同持股群体。

big
SZSE:300145 Ownership Breakdown December 26th 2024
深交所:300145 股权分布 2024年12月26日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Nanfang Zhongjin Environment?

机构持股告诉我们关于中金环境什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与一个常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买纳入相关基准指数的大型公司股票。

We can see that Nanfang Zhongjin Environment does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Nanfang Zhongjin Environment's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我们可以看到中金环境确实有机构投资者,他们持有公司很大一部分股票。这在一定程度上表明了专业投资者的可信度。但是我们不能仅依赖这一事实,因为机构有时会做出糟糕的投资,就像其他人一样。如果多个机构同时改变了对某只股票的看法,您可能会看到股价迅速下跌。因此,值得关注中金环境的盈利历史。 当然,未来才是真正重要的。

big
SZSE:300145 Earnings and Revenue Growth December 26th 2024
SZSE:300145 盈利和营业收入增长 2024年12月26日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Nanfang Zhongjin Environment. The company's largest shareholder is Wuxi Public Utilities Industrial Group Co.,Ltd., with ownership of 22%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.9% and 2.1%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

对冲基金在中金环境的股份不多。公司的最大股东是无锡公共事业集团有限公司,持有22%的股份。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有7.9%和2.1%的流通股份。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

对我们的股东数据进行更深入的分析显示,前25大股东总计持有的股份不足登记公司一半,表明存在一大批小股东,没有任何单一股东拥有多数股份。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.

研究机构的持股是评估和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以实现相同的目标。这只股票有一些分析师的覆盖,但随着时间的发展,它仍然有可能变得更加知名。

Insider Ownership Of Nanfang Zhongjin Environment

中金环境的内部股权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

虽然对内幕人的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内幕人。公司管理层向董事会负责,后者应该代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时候高层管理者自己也是董事会成员。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部持股是积极的,因为这表明董事会与其他股东保持良好的一致性。然而,在某些情况下,权力在这个群体中过于集中。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Nanfang Zhongjin Environment Co., Ltd.. Insiders have a CN¥985m stake in this CN¥7.2b business. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

看来内部人员拥有中金环境有限公司相当大比例的股份。内部人员在这家价值72亿人民币的企业中持有98500万人民币的股份。看到内部人员如此关注业务真是太好了。值得检查一下这些内部人员最近是否有买入。

General Public Ownership

公众持股

The general public -- including retail investors -- own 56% of Nanfang Zhongjin Environment. This size of ownership gives investors from the general public some collective power. They can and probably do influence decisions on executive compensation, dividend policies and proposed business acquisitions.

公众——包括散户投资者——拥有中金环境56%的股份。这个持股比例赋予了公众投资者一些集体权力。他们可以,并且很可能影响管理层薪酬、分红政策和拟议的业务收购决策。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司所有权

It seems that Private Companies own 22%, of the Nanfang Zhongjin Environment stock. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

似乎私人公司拥有中金环境22%的股份。值得深入研究一下。如果相关方,例如内部人士,对这些私人公司有兴趣,那么应该在年报中披露。私人公司也可能对该公司有战略利益。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Nanfang Zhongjin Environment better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Nanfang Zhongjin Environment .

考虑拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得的。然而,为了更好地理解中金环境,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。为此,您应该注意我们发现的与中金环境相关的两个警告信号。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终,决定这个业务的所有者表现如何的,是未来而不是过去。因此,我们认为查看这份免费的报告是明智的,报告显示分析师是否预测了一个更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发