share_log

With 73% Ownership of the Shares, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE:JPM) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

With 73% Ownership of the Shares, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE:JPM) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

摩根大通Alerian MLP指数ETN(纽交所:JPM)拥有73%的股份,主要由机构投资者主导。
Simply Wall St ·  12/26 01:50

Key Insights

关键洞察

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, JPMorgan Chase's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions

  • A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 45% ownership

  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business

  • 由于机构在该股票中拥有大量股份,摩根大通的股价可能受到他们交易决策的影响。

  • 共有25位投资者在该公司拥有45%的控股权。

  • 分析师的预测和所有权数据有助于对业务前景形成清晰的认识。

Every investor in JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE:JPM) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups.  With 73% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company.   That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

每位在摩根大通Alerian MLP指数ETN(纽交所:JPM)的投资者都应该了解最强大的股东群体。机构拥有73%的股份,是公司最大股东。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将获得最大的利益(或者在下跌时损失最多)。

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors.  Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.  

由于机构可以接触到大量资本,他们的市场动向往往会受到零售或个人投资者的高度关注。因此,投资于该公司的大部分机构资金通常是对其未来的强烈信心投票。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of JPMorgan Chase, beginning with the chart below.

让我们更深入地探讨摩根大通的每种所有者类型,首先是下面的图表。

NYSE:JPM Ownership Breakdown December 25th 2024

纽交所:JPm 所有权结构 2024年12月25日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About JPMorgan Chase?

机构所有权告诉我们关于摩根大通的什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与一个常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买纳入相关基准指数的大型公司股票。

JPMorgan Chase already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company.  This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does.  If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at JPMorgan Chase's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

摩根大通已经有机构在股份登记册上。实际上,他们在公司中持有可观的股份。这表明在专业投资者中有一定的信誉。但我们不能仅仅依赖这一点,因为机构有时也会进行糟糕的投资,就像其他人一样。如果多个机构同时改变对某只股票的看法,你可能会看到股价迅速下跌。因此,查看摩根大通的盈利历史是值得的。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

NYSE:JPM Earnings and Revenue Growth December 25th 2024

纽交所:摩根大通收益和营业收入增长 2024年12月25日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions.    We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in JPMorgan Chase.      Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 9.7% of shares outstanding.       With 7.2% and 4.5% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.  

机构投资者拥有超过50%的公司股份,因此他们能强烈影响董事会的决策。我们注意到,对摩根大通的对冲基金没有意义的投资。查看我们的数据,我们可以看到最大的股东是先锋集团,持有9.7%的流通股份。摩根大通的第二大和第三大股东分别是贝莱德和道富银行,持有7.2%和4.5%的流通股份。

Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

我们的研究表明,前25大股东共同控制的公司的股份不到一半,这意味着公司的股份分散广泛,没有主导股东。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance.   There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.  

在研究一家公司的机构持股时,可以为你的研究增值,同时研究分析师的推荐也是一种好习惯,以更深入地了解股票的预期表现。有相当数量的分析师在关注该股票,因此了解他们对未来的整体看法可能会很有用。

Insider Ownership Of JPMorgan Chase

摩根大通(JPMorgan Chase)的内部所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count.  Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

不同国家对内幕人士的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是被视为内幕人士。管理层最终要对董事会负责。然而,管理者通常是执行董事会成员尤其当他们是创始人或首席执行官时,这并不罕见。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部持股是积极的,因为这表明董事会与其他股东保持良好的一致性。然而,在某些情况下,权力在这个群体中过于集中。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of JPMorgan Chase & Co. in their own names.   It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$2.5b worth of shares (at current prices).  It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.  

我们的数据显示,内幕人士以自己名义持有的摩根大通Alerian MLP指数ETN的股份不到1%。这是一个非常大的公司,因此内幕人士拥有大量股份的情况令人感到惊讶。尽管他们的持股比例不到1%,我们可以看到董事会成员共持有价值25亿美金的股份(按当前价格计算)。看到董事会成员持有股份是好事,但值得检查这些内幕人士是否有在买入。

General Public Ownership

公众持股

With a 26% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over JPMorgan Chase.  This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

一般公众以26%的持股比例,主要由个人投资者构成,对摩根大通有一定的影响力。这一持股规模虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand JPMorgan Chase better, we need to consider many other factors.    Case in point: We've spotted   1 warning sign for JPMorgan Chase  you should be aware of.    

思考拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得的。但要更好地理解摩根大通,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。恰好:我们发现了一个你应该注意的摩根大通的警示信号。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终,决定这个业务的所有者表现如何的,是未来而不是过去。因此,我们认为查看这份免费的报告是明智的,报告显示分析师是否预测了一个更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发