share_log

Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on United Community Banks, Inc. (NYSE:UCB) With 82% Ownership

Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on United Community Banks, Inc. (NYSE:UCB) With 82% Ownership

机构投资者在美国社区银行(纽交所:UCB)上有很大的投资风险,持股高达82%。
Simply Wall St ·  12/26 05:39

Key Insights

关键洞察

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies United Community Banks' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 7 shareholders
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 显著高的机构持股意味着美国社区银行的股价对其交易行为非常敏感。
  • 51%的业务由前7大股东持有
  • 内部人士最近一直在卖出。

If you want to know who really controls United Community Banks, Inc. (NYSE:UCB), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 82% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果你想知道谁真正控制了美国社区银行股份有限公司(纽交所:UCB),那么你需要查看其股东登记的构成。我们可以看到,机构拥有公司的大部分股份,达82%的持股比例。换句话说,该集团面临着最大的上涨潜力(或下跌风险)。

Last week's 3.7% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. One-year return to shareholders is currently 11% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.

上周3.7%的涨幅意味着尽管公司展现出较强的长期趋势,机构投资者仍处于积极的一端。股东的年回报率目前为11%,上周的涨幅更是锦上添花。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of United Community Banks, beginning with the chart below.

让我们深入探讨美国社区银行的每一种所有者,从下面的图表开始。

big
NYSE:UCB Ownership Breakdown December 26th 2024
纽交所:UCb 所有权分布 2024年12月26日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About United Community Banks?

机构所有权告诉我们关于美国社区银行什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时,会与基准进行比较,因此一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常对该股票会更加热情。我们预期大多数公司在登记时都会有一些机构,尤其是当它们正在增长时。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in United Community Banks. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see United Community Banks' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如你所见,机构投资者在美国社区银行上拥有相当的股份。这在专业投资者中暗示了一定的信任度。但我们不能仅仅依靠这一事实,因为机构有时也会做出错误的投资,就像其他人一样。当多家机构持有同一只股票时,总有风险他们可能处于"拥挤交易"中。当这样的交易出现问题时,多个参与者可能会争相快速出售股票。在没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更大。你可以看到美国社区银行的历史盈利和营业收入,但请记住,事情总有更多的内幕。

big
NYSE:UCB Earnings and Revenue Growth December 26th 2024
纽交所:美国社区银行2024年12月26日的盈利和营业收入增长

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in United Community Banks. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 15% of shares outstanding. With 12% and 8.9% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and FMR LLC are the second and third largest shareholders.

由于机构投资者持有超过一半的已发行股票,董事会很可能需要关注他们的偏好。对冲基金在美国社区银行的持股不多。贝莱德公司目前是该公司最大股东,持有15%的流通股。先锋集团公司和FMR LLC分别是第二和第三大股东,持有12%和8.9%的流通股。

We also observed that the top 7 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我们还观察到,前7大股东占据了超过一半的股份登记,部分小股东在一定程度上平衡了大股东的利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

虽然研究公司的机构持股可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的推荐也是一种良好的做法,以更深入地了解股票的预期表现。许多分析师覆盖此股票,因此您可以很容易地查看预测增长。

Insider Ownership Of United Community Banks

美国社区银行的内部持股情况

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

虽然对内幕人的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内幕人。公司管理层向董事会负责,后者应该代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时候高层管理者自己也是董事会成员。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人拥有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情况下,这使得其他股东更难让董事会对决策负责。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of United Community Banks, Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around US$22m worth of shares (at current prices). It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我们最近的数据表明,内部人士拥有美国社区银行公司不到1%的股份。这是一家相当大的公司,因此董事会成员可能在公司中拥有一定的实质性股份,而不一定拥有很多比例上的股份。在这种情况下,他们拥有价值约2200万美元的股票(按当前价格计算)。看到至少有一些内部人持股总是好的,但值得检查一下这些内部人士是否在卖出。

General Public Ownership

公众持股

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 17% stake in United Community Banks. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

通常情况下,公众投资者(即个体投资者)在美国社区银行持有17%的股份。虽然这个群体不一定能够决定事务,但他们确实能够对公司的运营产生实质性的影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for United Community Banks that you should be aware of before investing here.

我发现研究谁真正拥有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正获得洞察,我们还需要考虑其他信息。比如,我们发现美国社区银行有1个警告信号,在这里投资前你应该注意。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最终,未来是最重要的。您可以访问此免费的关于公司分析师预测的报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发