Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on American Superconductor Corporation (NASDAQ:AMSC) With 71% Ownership
Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on American Superconductor Corporation (NASDAQ:AMSC) With 71% Ownership
Key Insights
关键洞察
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, American Superconductor's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- A total of 17 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Insiders have sold recently
- 由于机构对股票的大量持有,美国超导的股票价格可能会受到他们交易决策的影响。
- 共有17位投资者在该公司拥有51%的控股权。
- 内部人士最近出售了股票。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of American Superconductor Corporation (NASDAQ:AMSC), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 71% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解谁真正控制着美国超导公司(纳斯达克:AMSC),首先需要理解业务的所有权结构。我们可以看到,机构在该公司的持股比例高达71%。换句话说,若股票上涨,该群体将获益最多(反之若出现下跌则损失最多)。
And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit US$987m in market cap. The one-year return on investment is currently 131% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.
上周,机构投资者在公司市值达到98700万美元后受益最多。目前一年的投资回报率为131%,而上周的收益无疑是受欢迎的。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about American Superconductor.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于美国超导的情况。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About American Superconductor?
机构所有权告诉我们关于美国超导的什么?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构的表现与近似当地市场的指数进行比较。因此,他们通常更加关注那些被纳入主要指数的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in American Superconductor. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at American Superconductor's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
如您所见,机构投资者在美国超导中持有相当一部分股份。这在专业投资者中暗示了某种可信度。但是我们不能仅仅依赖这一事实,因为机构有时也会做出糟糕的投资,就像其他人一样。如果多个机构同时改变对一只股票的看法,您可能会看到股价迅速下跌。因此,值得查看以下美国超导的盈利历史。当然,未来才是最重要的。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. American Superconductor is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc., with ownership of 6.9%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 6.1% and 5.3% of the stock. Additionally, the company's CEO Daniel McGahn directly holds 3.1% of the total shares outstanding.
机构投资者拥有超过50%的公司股份,因此他们可以共同强有力地影响董事会的决策。美国超导并不属于对冲基金。公司的最大股东是贝莱德有限公司,拥有6.9%的股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股东分别持有约6.1%和5.3%的股票。此外,公司的首席执行官丹尼尔·麦克甘直接持有3.1%的已发行股份。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 17 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
从股东登记册来看,我们可以看到前17名股东控制了51%的所有权,这意味着没有单个股东拥有多数股权。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
虽然研究公司的机构持股数据是合理的,但研究分析师意见也很有意义,以了解趋势如何。相当多的分析师覆盖了这只股票,因此你可以很轻松地查看预期增长。
Insider Ownership Of American Superconductor
美国超导的内部持股情况
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司内部人员的定义可能具有主观性,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少包括董事会成员。管理层最终需要对董事会负责。然而,管理者成为执行董事会成员并不罕见,尤其是在他们是创始人或CEO的情况下。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部持股显示领导层像真正的公司所有者一样思考时,这是积极的。然而,高比例的内部持股也可能给予公司内部小团体巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in American Superconductor Corporation. In their own names, insiders own US$43m worth of stock in the US$987m company. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我们最新的数据表明,内部人士持有一些美国超导公司的股票。内部人士以其个人名义拥有价值4300万美元的股票,而该公司的市值为98700万美元。有些人会说这显示了股东与董事会之间的利益一致性。但值得检查一下这些内部人士是否已经在卖出股票。
General Public Ownership
公众持股
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 25% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公众——包括散户投资者——持有公司25%的股份,因此不能被轻易忽视。虽然这种规模的持股可能不足以影响政策决定,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for American Superconductor that you should be aware of.
我发现查看谁真正拥有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正获得深入的见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。 例如,我们已经识别出美国超导的三个警告信号,您应该注意。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最终,决定这个业务的所有者表现如何的,是未来而不是过去。因此,我们认为查看这份免费的报告是明智的,报告显示分析师是否预测了一个更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。