share_log

Alcoa Corporation (NYSE:AA) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 71%

Alcoa Corporation (NYSE:AA) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 71%

美国铝业公司(纽交所:AA)在拥有71%的机构投资者中备受喜爱
Simply Wall St ·  2024/12/30 18:21

Key Insights

关键洞察

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Alcoa implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 22 shareholders
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 机构在美国铝业公司的大量持股意味着他们对公司股价具有重要影响力。
  • 顶级22名股东持有51%的业务。
  • 内部人士最近出售了股票。

A look at the shareholders of Alcoa Corporation (NYSE:AA) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 71% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

观察美国铝业公司(纽交所:AA)的股东可以告诉我们哪个群体最强大。机构持有71%的股份,拥有公司最多的股份。换句话说,该群体面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

由于机构投资者拥有巨大的资源和流动性,他们的投资决策往往具有很大的影响力,特别是在个人投资者中。因此,机构投资在公司中的占比被普遍视为积极特征。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Alcoa.

在下面的图表中,我们放大了美国铝业公司的不同持股群体。

big
NYSE:AA Ownership Breakdown December 30th 2024
纽交所:AA 2024年12月30日的持股分解

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Alcoa?

机构持股对美国铝业公司意味着什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与一个常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买纳入相关基准指数的大型公司股票。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Alcoa. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Alcoa, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

正如您所看到的,机构投资者在美国铝业公司中拥有相当的股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师对该股票进行了审查,并且他们喜欢它。但就像其他任何人一样,他们也可能会错。而且,如果两家大型机构投资者同时尝试出售一只股票,通常会看到股价大幅下跌。因此,查看美国铝业公司过去的盈利轨迹是值得的(见下文)。当然,也要记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

big
NYSE:AA Earnings and Revenue Growth December 30th 2024
纽交所:美国铝业公司盈利与营业收入增长 2024年12月30日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Alcoa. Our data shows that The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 10% of shares outstanding. With 10% and 6.0% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and Eagle Capital Management LLC are the second and third largest shareholders.

机构投资者拥有超过50%的公司股份,因此他们能够强力影响董事会的决策。对冲基金在美国铝业公司的股份并不多。我们的数据表明,先锋集团是最大的股东,持股比例为10%。贝莱德和鹰资本管理公司分别以10%和6.0%的持股比例位列第二和第三大股东。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 22 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

对我们的股权数据进行更深入的分析显示,前22大股东的整体持股比例为51%,这意味着没有单一股东拥有多数股权。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

虽然研究公司的机构持股数据是合理的,但研究分析师意见也很有意义,以了解趋势如何。相当多的分析师覆盖了这只股票,因此你可以很轻松地查看预期增长。

Insider Ownership Of Alcoa

美国铝业公司的内部股权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

虽然内部人的精确定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员都是内部人。管理层最终要向董事会负责。然而,管理者成为执行董事会成员并不罕见,尤其是在他们是创始人或首席执行官的情况下。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部持股显示领导层像真正的公司所有者一样思考时,这是积极的。然而,高比例的内部持股也可能给予公司内部小团体巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Alcoa Corporation in their own names. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$71m of stock. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我们的数据显示,内部人士在美国铝业公司以自己的名义持有不足1%的股份。由于公司规模庞大,我们不期望内部人士拥有大量股份。他们总共持有7100万美元的股票。看到至少一些内部人士持股总是好的,但值得检查一下这些内部人士是否一直在出售股份。

General Public Ownership

公众持股

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 28% stake in Alcoa. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公众,通常是个体投资者,持有美国铝业公司28%的股份。虽然这个群体不一定能够决定公司的实施,但它确实可以对公司的运行产生真实影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with Alcoa , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

虽然考虑拥有一家公司的不同集团是非常值得的,但还有其他因素更为重要。 例如,投资风险始终存在。 我们已经发现美国铝业公司有两个警告信号,理解它们应该成为你投资过程的一部分。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一样,你可能想考虑这家公司是会增长还是缩小。幸运的是,你可以查看这份免费的报告,了解分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发