Aurora Innovation, Inc. (NASDAQ:AUR) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 55% of the Company
Aurora Innovation, Inc. (NASDAQ:AUR) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 55% of the Company
Key Insights
关键洞察
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Aurora Innovation's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- A total of 5 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
- Insiders have been selling lately
- 显著的高机构持股意味着Aurora Innovation的股票价格对他们的交易行为很敏感
- 共有5位投资者在公司中拥有52%的控股权。
- 内部人士最近一直在卖出。
A look at the shareholders of Aurora Innovation, Inc. (NASDAQ:AUR) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 55% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
查看Aurora Innovation, Inc. (纳斯达克:AUR)的股东可以让我们知道哪个群体最强大。我们可以看到,机构在公司中拥有绝大部分股份,持股比例为55%。换句话说,这个群体面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.
由于机构投资者拥有巨大的资源和流动性,他们的投资决策往往具有很大的影响力,特别是在个人投资者中。因此,机构投资在公司中的占比被普遍视为积极特征。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Aurora Innovation.
在下面的图表中,我们放大了Aurora Innovation的不同所有权群体。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Aurora Innovation?
机构所有权告诉我们关于Aurora Innovation什么?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构的表现与近似当地市场的指数进行比较。因此,他们通常更加关注那些被纳入主要指数的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Aurora Innovation. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Aurora Innovation's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如你所看到的,机构投资者在Aurora Innovation中拥有相当大的股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经研究了这只股票,并且他们喜欢它。但就像其他任何人一样,他们也可能犯错。当多家机构拥有一只股票时,总是存在它们在一个“拥挤的交易”中的风险。当这样的交易出现问题时,多个参与方可能会争相快速卖出股票。在没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更高。你可以看到Aurora Innovation的历史盈利和营业收入,但请记住,故事总有更多的内容。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Aurora Innovation. Our data shows that Uber Technologies, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 19% of shares outstanding. T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 13% of common stock, and Christopher Urmson holds about 8.5% of the company stock. Christopher Urmson, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chairman of the Board.
投资者应注意,机构实际上拥有公司超过一半的股份,因此它们可以共同发挥重要的影响力。对Aurora Innovation来说,对冲基金的股份不多。我们的数据显示,优步科技公司是最大股东,持有19%的流通股。普信集团是第二大股东,持有13%的普通股,而Christopher Urmson持有约8.5%的公司股票。作为第三大股东的Christopher Urmson,还担任董事会主席的职务。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 5 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making.
为了让我们的研究更加有趣,我们发现前5大股东控制了公司超过一半的股份,这意味着这一群体在公司的决策中具有相当大的影响力。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
虽然研究公司的机构持股数据是合理的,但研究分析师意见也很有意义,以了解趋势如何。相当多的分析师覆盖了这只股票,因此你可以很轻松地查看预期增长。
Insider Ownership Of Aurora Innovation
Aurora Innovation的内部持股情况
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
内部人的定义在不同国家之间可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是算作内部人。公司管理层负责运营业务,但首席执行官将向董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会的成员。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部持股是积极的,因为这表明董事会与其他股东保持良好的一致性。然而,在某些情况下,权力在这个群体中过于集中。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Aurora Innovation, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$12b, and insiders have US$1.6b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.
看来内部人士拥有Aurora Innovation, Inc.的相当大比例股份。它的市值仅为120亿美元,而内部人士名下的股份价值为16亿美元。这相当可观。大多数人会高兴地看到董事会与他们共同投资。您可能希望访问这张免费的图表,查看内部人士最近的交易。
General Public Ownership
公众持股
With a 10% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Aurora Innovation. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公共投资者拥有10%的股份,主要由个体投资者组成,他们对Aurora Innovation有一定的影响力。虽然这个群体不一定能够决定一切,但它确实可以对公司的运营产生实际影响。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有权
We can see that public companies hold 21% of the Aurora Innovation shares on issue. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.
我们可以看到,上市公司持有21%的Aurora Innovation流通股份。这可能是战略利益,并且这两家公司可能有相关的业务关系。它们可能已经进行过分拆。这个持股可能值得进一步调查。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 4 warning signs for Aurora Innovation you should be aware of, and 1 of them shouldn't be ignored.
虽然考虑拥有一家公司的不同群体是非常重要的,但还有其他更重要的因素。 举个例子:我们发现Aurora Innovation有4个警示信号 您应该注意,其中1个不容忽视。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最终,决定这个业务的所有者表现如何的,是未来而不是过去。因此,我们认为查看这份免费的报告是明智的,报告显示分析师是否预测了一个更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。