Constellation Energy Corporation (NASDAQ:CEG) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 82%
Constellation Energy Corporation (NASDAQ:CEG) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 82%
Key Insights
关键洞察
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Constellation Energy implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- The top 9 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 机构在康斯特ellation能源公司中大量持股,意味着他们对公司股价有显著影响。
- 前9大股东持有公司50%的股份。
- 分析师的预测以及持有数据有助于强烈理解业务的前景
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Constellation Energy Corporation (NASDAQ:CEG), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 82% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解谁真正控制了康斯特ellation能源公司(纳斯达克:CEG),了解业务的所有权结构非常重要。拥有公司最多股份的群体,大约占82%,是机构。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该群体将是受益最大的一方(如果出现下滑,他们将是损失最大的)。
Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.
由于机构拥有庞大的资金和研究能力,因此机构持股往往具有重要影响力,尤其是在个人投资者中。因此,投入一家公司大量资金的机构通常被视为积极属性。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Constellation Energy.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于Constellation Energy的什么。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Constellation Energy?
机构持有权告诉我们关于Constellation能源的什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与一个常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买纳入相关基准指数的大型公司股票。
Constellation Energy already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Constellation Energy's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
Constellation Energy已经在股东名册上有机构持有股份。事实上,他们在公司中拥有相当可观的股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经对这只股票进行了研究,并且他们喜欢它。但是就像其他人一样,他们也可能是错误的。如果多个机构同时改变对一只股票的看法,您可能会看到股价迅速下跌。因此,值得看看下面Constellation Energy的盈利历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Constellation Energy. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Capital Research and Management Company with 12% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 12% and 7.0%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
机构投资者拥有超过50%的公司股份,因此他们可以共同强有力地影响董事会的决策。我们注意到对康斯特ellation能源并没有重要的对冲基金投资。根据我们的数据,我们可以看到,最大的股东是资本研究与管理公司,持有12%的流通股。与此同时,第二大和第三大股东分别持有12%和7.0%的流通股。
We also observed that the top 9 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.
我们还观察到,排名前9的股东占据了股东名册的过半数,少数小股东在一定程度上平衡了大股东的利益。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
虽然研究一家公司机构的所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的看法也同样重要,以了解市场的动态。很多分析师关注这只股票,因此查看他们的预测也可能是值得的。
Insider Ownership Of Constellation Energy
康斯特雷能源的内部所有权
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
虽然对内幕人的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内幕人。公司管理层向董事会负责,后者应该代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时候高层管理者自己也是董事会成员。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部持股是积极的,因为这表明董事会与其他股东保持良好的一致性。然而,在某些情况下,权力在这个群体中过于集中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Constellation Energy Corporation. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$98m worth of shares (at current prices). In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我们最近的数据表明,内部人士持有的康斯特ellation能源公司的股份不足1%。这是一个非常大的公司,因此内部人士持有公司很大比例的股份是令人惊讶的。尽管他们的持股额不到1%,但我们可以看到董事会成员总共拥有价值9800万美元的股票(按当前价格计算)。在这种情况下,更有趣的是看看那些内部人士是买入还是卖出。
General Public Ownership
公众持股
With a 17% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Constellation Energy. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公众持股17%,大多数由个人投资者组成,对康斯特ellation能源公司有一定的影响力。虽然这一群体并不一定能够做主,但他们确实可以对公司的运营产生实际影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Constellation Energy that you should be aware of before investing here.
我发现查看一家公司的具体所有者非常有趣。不过,要真正获得洞察,我们还需要考虑其他信息。比如,我们发现了两条关于康斯特ellation能源的警告信号,你在此投资之前应当了解这些。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您想了解分析师对未来增长的预测,请不要错过这份关于分析师预测的免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。