Should We Be Cautious About Equifax Inc.'s (NYSE:EFX) ROE Of 11%?
Should We Be Cautious About Equifax Inc.'s (NYSE:EFX) ROE Of 11%?
While some investors are already well versed in financial metrics (hat tip), this article is for those who would like to learn about Return On Equity (ROE) and why it is important. We'll use ROE to examine Equifax Inc. (NYSE:EFX), by way of a worked example.
虽然一些投资者已经熟悉财务指标,但这篇文章是为了那些想要了解净资产收益率(ROE)及其重要性的人。我们将通过一个实例来使用ROE来分析艾可菲公司(纽交所:EFX)。
Return on equity or ROE is a key measure used to assess how efficiently a company's management is utilizing the company's capital. In simpler terms, it measures the profitability of a company in relation to shareholder's equity.
净资产收益率(ROE)是评估公司管理层如何有效利用公司资本的关键指标。简单来说,它衡量了公司相对于股东权益的盈利能力。
How Is ROE Calculated?
净资产收益率怎么计算?
The formula for ROE is:
roe的公式是:
Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity
股东权益回报率 = 净利润(来自持续运营)÷ 股东权益
So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Equifax is:
所以,根据上述公式,艾可菲的ROE为:
11% = US$568m ÷ US$5.0b (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2024).
11% = 56800万美元 ÷ 50亿人民币(基于截止到2024年9月的过去十二个月)。
The 'return' is the yearly profit. One way to conceptualize this is that for each $1 of shareholders' capital it has, the company made $0.11 in profit.
“收益”是指每年的利润。一个可以理解的方式是,对于每1美元的股东资本,公司赚取了0.11美元的利润。
Does Equifax Have A Good ROE?
艾可菲的ROE好吗?
One simple way to determine if a company has a good return on equity is to compare it to the average for its industry. Importantly, this is far from a perfect measure, because companies differ significantly within the same industry classification. If you look at the image below, you can see Equifax has a lower ROE than the average (20%) in the Professional Services industry classification.
判断一家公司是否有良好的股本回报率的一个简单方法是将其与行业的平均水平进行比较。重要的是,这远不是一个完美的衡量标准,因为在同一行业分类中,公司之间差异显著。如果您查看下面的图片,您会看到艾可菲的ROE低于专业服务行业分类的平均水平(20%)。
That's not what we like to see. However, a low ROE is not always bad. If the company's debt levels are moderate to low, then there's still a chance that returns can be improved via the use of financial leverage. A high debt company having a low ROE is a different story altogether and a risky investment in our books.
这不是我们想看到的。然而,低ROE并不总是坏事。如果公司的债务水平适中或低,那么仍然有机会通过金融杠杆来改善回报。高债务公司的低ROE则完全另当别论,这在我们看来是一次风险投资。
Why You Should Consider Debt When Looking At ROE
为什么在观察ROE时你应该考虑债务问题?
Virtually all companies need money to invest in the business, to grow profits. That cash can come from retained earnings, issuing new shares (equity), or debt. In the first and second cases, the ROE will reflect this use of cash for investment in the business. In the latter case, the debt required for growth will boost returns, but will not impact the shareholders' equity. That will make the ROE look better than if no debt was used.
几乎所有公司都需要资金来投资于业务,以增长利润。这笔资金可以来自留存收益、发行新股(股本)或债务。在前两种情况下,ROE将反映这种资金用于投资业务的情况。在后者情况下,增长所需的债务将提升回报,但不会影响股东权益。这样,ROE看起来会比未使用债务时更好。
Equifax's Debt And Its 11% ROE
艾可菲的债务及其11%的ROE
It's worth noting the high use of debt by Equifax, leading to its debt to equity ratio of 1.08. With a fairly low ROE, and significant use of debt, it's hard to get excited about this business at the moment. Debt increases risk and reduces options for the company in the future, so you generally want to see some good returns from using it.
值得注意的是,艾可菲的高债务使用率,使其债务股本比率达到1.08。由于ROE相对较低,且债务使用显著,目前很难对这个业务感到兴奋。债务增加了风险,并减少了公司未来的选择,因此通常希望看到使用债务能带来一些良好的回报。
Conclusion
结论
Return on equity is useful for comparing the quality of different businesses. Companies that can achieve high returns on equity without too much debt are generally of good quality. If two companies have around the same level of debt to equity, and one has a higher ROE, I'd generally prefer the one with higher ROE.
股东权益回报率对于比较不同业务的质量是很有用的。能够在没有过多债务的情况下实现高股东权益回报率的公司通常质量较好。如果两家公司债务与股本比率大致相同,而其中一家ROE更高,我通常会偏好ROE更高的那家。
But when a business is high quality, the market often bids it up to a price that reflects this. The rate at which profits are likely to grow, relative to the expectations of profit growth reflected in the current price, must be considered, too. So you might want to take a peek at this data-rich interactive graph of forecasts for the company.
但是当一个业务质量高时,市场通常会把它推升到一个反映这一点的价格。还必须考虑利润可能增长的速度相对于当前价格所反映的利润增长预期的关系。因此,您可能想看看这个数据丰富的公司预测的互动图表。
Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.
当然,你可能会在其他地方找到一个了不起的投资机会。所以查看一下这个有趣公司的免费清单。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。