With 66% Ownership of the Shares, Shopify Inc. (NYSE:SHOP) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners
With 66% Ownership of the Shares, Shopify Inc. (NYSE:SHOP) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners
Key Insights
关键洞察
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Shopify's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- 49% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
- Insiders have sold recently
- 显著的高机构持有意味着Shopify的股票价格对其交易行为敏感
- 业务的49%由前25名股东持有。
- 内部人士最近出售了股票。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Shopify Inc. (NYSE:SHOP), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 66% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
要了解谁真正控制了Shopify Inc.(纽交所:SHOP),了解业务的所有权结构是重要的。机构持有66%的股份,是公司最大股东。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.
考虑到他们掌握的巨额资金和研究能力,机构持股往往具有重要影响力,特别是在个人投资者中。因此,投资于公司的大部分机构资金通常是对其未来的巨大信任投票。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Shopify, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入了解每种类型的Shopify所有者,从下面的图表开始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shopify?
机构所有权对shopify有何影响?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构的表现与近似当地市场的指数进行比较。因此,他们通常更加关注那些被纳入主要指数的公司。
We can see that Shopify does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Shopify's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我们可以看到Shopify确实有机构投资者,他们持有公司股票的一部分。这表明该公司在投资社区中具有一定的信誉。然而,最好对依赖于机构投资者所带来的所谓验证保持谨慎。他们有时也会出错。如果多个机构同时改变对一只股票的看法,你可能会看到股价迅速下跌。因此,值得查看下面Shopify的营业收入历史。当然,未来才是最重要的。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Shopify is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is Capital Research and Management Company, with ownership of 9.6%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 6.2% and 4.9%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Tobias Lütke, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.
投资者应注意,机构实际上拥有超过一半的公司股份,因此他们可以共同施加重大影响力。Shopify并不被对冲基金拥有。公司的最大股东是资本研究与管理公司,持有9.6%的股份。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有6.2%和4.9%的流通股份。第二大股东托比亚斯·吕特克(Tobias Lütke)也恰好担任首席执行官。
A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.
对我们的股东数据进行更深入的分析显示,前25大股东总计持有的股份不足登记公司一半,表明存在一大批小股东,没有任何单一股东拥有多数股份。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究一家公司的机构持有情况可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的推荐也是一个好的做法,以更深入地了解股票的预期表现。许多分析师在跟踪这只股票,因此也值得看看他们的预测。
Insider Ownership Of Shopify
shopify的内部持股
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
内部人的定义在不同国家之间可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是算作内部人。公司管理层负责运营业务,但首席执行官将向董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会的成员。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人拥有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情况下,这使得其他股东更难让董事会对决策负责。
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Shopify Inc.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$8.8b. Most would say this shows a good alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
股东们可能会有兴趣了解内部人士在Shopify Inc.中拥有股份。内部人士持有价值88亿美元的重大股份。大多数人会认为,这表明股东和董事会之间的利益良好一致。不过,检查一下这些内部人士是否在卖出也是值得的。
General Public Ownership
公众持股
With a 28% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Shopify. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公众持有28%的股份,主要由个人投资者组成,对Shopify具有一定的影响力。虽然这种规模的股份可能不足以影响政策决定,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Shopify that you should be aware of.
虽然考虑拥有一家公司的不同群体非常重要,但还有其他因素更为关键。比如,我们已经发现了Shopify的两个警告信号,你应该注意。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您想了解分析师对未来增长的预测,请不要错过这份关于分析师预测的免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。