RLI Corp. (NYSE:RLI) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 81%
RLI Corp. (NYSE:RLI) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 81%
Key Insights
关键洞察
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, RLI's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- The top 12 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 由于机构在股票中持有大量股份,RLI的股票价格可能会受到他们交易决策的影响。
- 前12大股东持有公司的50%股份。
- 分析师的预测以及持有数据有助于强烈理解业务的前景
A look at the shareholders of RLI Corp. (NYSE:RLI) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 81% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
查看RLI保险(纽交所:RLI)的股东可以告诉我们哪个团体最强大。我们可以看到,机构在公司中拥有绝大部分股份,持股比例达到81%。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该团体将获得最大利益(如果出现下跌,他们将损失最大)。
Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.
由于机构拥有庞大的资金和研究能力,因此机构持股往往具有重要影响力,尤其是在个人投资者中。因此,投入一家公司大量资金的机构通常被视为积极属性。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about RLI.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于RLI的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About RLI?
机构持股告诉我们关于RLI什么?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时,会与基准进行比较,因此一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常对该股票会更加热情。我们预期大多数公司在登记时都会有一些机构,尤其是当它们正在增长时。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in RLI. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at RLI's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
正如你所看到的,机构投资者在RLI中持有相当数量的股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经研究了这只股票,并对其表示认可。但和其他人一样,他们也可能会出错。如果多个机构同时改变对一只股票的看法,股票价格可能会迅速下跌。因此,值得关注下面RLI的营业收入历史。当然,未来才是最重要的。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in RLI. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 10.0% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 9.6% and 8.0% of the stock.
投资者应该注意,机构实际上拥有公司超过一半的股份,因此它们可以集体发挥重要作用。我们注意到,对RLI的对冲基金并没有进行有意义的投资。先锋集团目前是最大股东,持有10.0%的流通股。相比之下,第二和第三大股东分别持有约9.6%和8.0%的股票。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 12 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
查看股东登记,我们可以看到前12位股东控制了50%的股份,这意味着没有任何单一股东拥有多数股份。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究一家公司的机构持有情况可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的推荐也是一个好的做法,以更深入地了解股票的预期表现。许多分析师在跟踪这只股票,因此也值得看看他们的预测。
Insider Ownership Of RLI
RLI内部持股
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
内部人的定义在不同国家之间可能略有不同,但董事会成员始终被算作内部人。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,管理者成为执行董事会成员并不罕见,特别是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人拥有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情况下,这使得其他股东更难让董事会对决策负责。
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in RLI Corp.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$294m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
股东们可能会感兴趣地了解到,内部人士在RLI保险中拥有股份。这是一家大公司,因此看到这种程度的利益一致是很好的。内部人士持有价值29400万美元的股份(按当前价格计算)。大多数人会说这表明了股东与董事会之间利益的一致性。不过,可能值得检查一下这些内部人士是否有卖出股份。
General Public Ownership
公众持股
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 15% stake in RLI. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般公众,通常是个人投资者,持有RLI 15%的股份。这个股权规模虽然相当可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同,可能不足以改变公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for RLI that you should be aware of before investing here.
虽然考虑拥有公司的不同群体是很重要的,但还有其他因素更为重要。 例如,我们发现了RLI保险的一个警告信号,在您投资之前应该注意。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一样,你可能想考虑这家公司是会增长还是缩小。幸运的是,你可以查看这份免费的报告,了解分析师对其未来的预测。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。