share_log

Institutional Owners May Take Dramatic Actions as Amplitude, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:AMPL) Recent 4.3% Drop Adds to One-year Losses

Institutional Owners May Take Dramatic Actions as Amplitude, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:AMPL) Recent 4.3% Drop Adds to One-year Losses

随着Amplitude, Inc.(纳斯达克:AMPL)最近下跌4.3%,机构投资者可能会采取重大行动,增加一年以来的损失。
Simply Wall St ·  01/01 03:20

Key Insights

关键洞察

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Amplitude implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • 54% of the business is held by the top 9 shareholders
  • Insiders own 14% of Amplitude
  • 机构在Amplitude的大量持股意味着它们对公司股价有 significant influence。
  • 前9大股东持有54%的业务。
  • 内部人士持有Amplitude 14%的股份。

Every investor in Amplitude, Inc. (NASDAQ:AMPL) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 52% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

每位Amplitude, Inc.(纳斯达克:AMPL)的投资者都应了解最强大的股东群体。持有最大份额的群体是机构,拥有52%的股份。换句话说,该群体面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

As a result, institutional investors endured the highest losses last week after market cap fell by US$60m. The recent loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 16% for stockholders, may not sit well with this group of investors. Often called "market movers", institutions wield significant power in influencing the price dynamics of any stock. As a result, if the decline continues, institutional investors may be pressured to sell Amplitude which might hurt individual investors.

因此,上周机构投资者承受了最高的损失,因为市值下降了6000万美元。这一最新损失,加上股东一年的损失达到16%,可能会让这一群体的投资者感到不快。通常被称为“市场推动者”,机构在影响任何股票的价格动态方面拥有显著的权力。因此,如果这种下降继续,机构投资者可能会被迫卖出Amplitude,这可能会伤害到散户投资者。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Amplitude.

让我们更仔细地看看不同类型的股东可以告诉我们关于Amplitude的哪些信息。

big
NasdaqCM:AMPL Ownership Breakdown January 1st 2025
纳斯达克CM:AMPL 2025年1月1日的所有权分布

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Amplitude?

机构所有权告诉我们关于Amplitude的什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与一个常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买纳入相关基准指数的大型公司股票。

We can see that Amplitude does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Amplitude's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我们可以看到Amplitude确实有机构投资者;他们持有公司股票的相当一部分。这表明在专业投资者中有一定的可信度。但我们不能仅凭这一事实就依赖,因为机构有时也会做出糟糕的投资,就像每个人一样。当多个机构拥有一只股票时,总是存在他们在“拥挤交易”中的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会争相快速卖出股票。在没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更高。你可以在下面看到Amplitude的历史盈利和营业收入,但请记住,事情总是有更多的内容。

big
NasdaqCM:AMPL Earnings and Revenue Growth January 1st 2025
纳斯达克CM:AMPL 盈利和营业收入增长 2025年1月1日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Amplitude is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Sequoia Capital Operations LLC with 8.0% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 6.8% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.5% by the third-largest shareholder. In addition, we found that Spenser Skates, the CEO has 5.0% of the shares allocated to their name.

机构投资者拥有公司超过50%的股份,因此他们可以共同强有力地影响董事会的决策。Amplitude并不被对冲基金拥有。从我们的数据来看,最大的股东是红杉资本运营有限责任公司,持有8.0%的流通股份。相比之下,第二大股东持有约6.8%的流通股份,第三大股东持有6.5%的股份。此外,我们发现首席执行官斯宾塞·斯凯茨名下拥有5.0%的股份。

We also observed that the top 9 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我们还观察到,排名前9的股东占据了股东名册的过半数,少数小股东在一定程度上平衡了大股东的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究机构的持有情况是判断和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以实现同样的目的。目前有合理数量的分析师在覆盖此股票,因此了解他们对未来的整体看法可能会有用。

Insider Ownership Of Amplitude

Amplitude的内部持股情况

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

内部人的定义在不同国家之间可能会略有不同,但董事会成员始终算作内部人。公司管理层向董事会负责,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也在董事会中。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部持股显示领导层像真正的公司所有者一样思考时,这是积极的。然而,高比例的内部持股也可能给予公司内部小团体巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Amplitude, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$1.3b, and insiders have US$191m worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.

看起来内部人员拥有Amplitude, Inc.的相当大部分股份。它的市值仅为13亿美金,内部人士持有价值19100万美金的股票。这是相当显著的。大多数人会很高兴看到董事会与他们一起投资。您可能希望访问这张免费图表,查看内部人士近期的交易。

General Public Ownership

公众持股

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 20% stake in Amplitude. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公众, 通常是个人投资者, 持有Amplitude 20%的股份。虽然这一所有权的规模可能不足以影响对他们有利的政策决定,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Private Equity Ownership

股权投资公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力参与塑造以价值创造为重点的公司策略。一些投资者可能会因此而受到鼓舞,因为股权投资公司有时可以鼓励市场看到公司的价值,从而采取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在将其上市后退出投资。

Private equity firms hold a 14% stake in Amplitude. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

私募股权公司持有Amplitude 14%的股份。这表明他们可以在关键政策决策中发挥影响力。有些人可能会喜欢这种情况,因为私募股权有时是积极的股东,会对管理层进行问责。但有时候,私募股权则是出卖股份,让公司上市。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for Amplitude (1 is a bit concerning) that you should be aware of.

虽然考虑拥有公司不同群体是很有价值的,但还有其他更重要的因素。例如,我们已经识别出Amplitude的3个警告信号(其中1个有点令人担忧),您需要注意。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一样,你可能想考虑这家公司是会增长还是缩小。幸运的是,你可以查看这份免费的报告,了解分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发