Private Companies Among Hengtong Logistics Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:603223) Largest Shareholders, Saw Gain in Holdings Value After Stock Jumped 7.5% Last Week
Private Companies Among Hengtong Logistics Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:603223) Largest Shareholders, Saw Gain in Holdings Value After Stock Jumped 7.5% Last Week
Key Insights
关键洞察
- Hengtong Logistics' significant private companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 57% ownership
- Insider ownership in Hengtong Logistics is 22%
- 恒通股份的私人公司持股比例显著,表明主要决策受到大股东的影响。
- 共有2名投资者在公司中拥有57%的控股权
- 恒通股份的内部持股为22%。
If you want to know who really controls Hengtong Logistics Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603223), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are private companies with 41% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
如果你想知道谁真正控制恒通股份有限公司(上海证券交易所代码:603223),那么你需要查看它的股份登记情况。持有最大份额的群体是私人公司,拥有41%的股份。也就是说,如果股票上涨,这个群体将获得最大收益(或者在股市下跌时损失最多)。
As a result, private companies collectively scored the highest last week as the company hit CN¥7.4b market cap following a 7.5% gain in the stock.
因此,上周私人公司整体得分最高,因为该公司的市值达到了74亿人民币,股票上涨了7.5%。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Hengtong Logistics.
在下图中,我们放大了恒通股份的不同持股群体。
What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Hengtong Logistics?
机构持股缺失对恒通股份意味着什么?
We don't tend to see institutional investors holding stock of companies that are very risky, thinly traded, or very small. Though we do sometimes see large companies without institutions on the register, it's not particularly common.
我们通常不看到机构投资者持有非常风险高、流动性低或非常小的公司的股票。尽管我们有时会看到没有机构注册的大公司,但这并不常见。
There are multiple explanations for why institutions don't own a stock. The most common is that the company is too small relative to funds under management, so the institution does not bother to look closely at the company. On the other hand, it's always possible that professional investors are avoiding a company because they don't think it's the best place for their money. Hengtong Logistics might not have the sort of past performance institutions are looking for, or perhaps they simply have not studied the business closely.
机构不持有某只股票的原因有多种。最常见的原因是该公司相对于管理的基金规模来说太小,因此机构不愿意仔细关注该公司。另一方面,专业投资者可能会避开某家公司,因为他们认为那不是最佳的投资选择。恒通股份可能没有机构所寻找的那种过往业绩,或者他们可能根本没有仔细研究这个业务。
Hengtong Logistics is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that Nanshan Group Co.,Ltd is the largest shareholder with 41% of shares outstanding. Zhen Liu is the second largest shareholder owning 16% of common stock, and Jian Bo Song holds about 4.5% of the company stock.
恒通股份并不被对冲基金所拥有。我们的数据显示,南山集团有限公司是最大的股东,持有41%的流通股。Zhen Liu是第二大股东,拥有16%的普通股,而Jian Bo Song持有公司大约4.5%的股份。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.
为了使我们的研究更有趣,我们发现前两大股东在公司中拥有大多数股权,这意味着他们有足够的权力影响公司的决策。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.
虽然研究公司的机构持股可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的推荐也是一个好的做法,可以更深入地理解股票的预期表现。就我们所知,似乎没有分析师对该公司的覆盖,因此它可能在雷达下飞行。
Insider Ownership Of Hengtong Logistics
恒通股份的内部股权
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少包括董事会成员。公司管理层负责业务的运行,但CEO需要对董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部持股是积极的,因为这表明董事会与其他股东保持良好的一致性。然而,在某些情况下,权力在这个群体中过于集中。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Hengtong Logistics Co., Ltd.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful CN¥1.7b stake in this CN¥7.4b business. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我们的信息显示,内部人士在恒通股份有限公司持有相当大的股份。值得注意的是,内部人士在这个市值74亿的业务中拥有高达17亿人民币的股份。看到这样的投资水平非常好。您可以在这里查看这些内部人士最近是否有买入。
General Public Ownership
公众持股
With a 35% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Hengtong Logistics. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公众持有35%的股份,大部分由个人投资者组成,这使他们在恒通股份上有一定的影响力。虽然这一群体不一定能做决定,但他们确实可以对公司运行产生真正的影响。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司所有权
We can see that Private Companies own 41%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
我们可以看到,私营公司持有41%的发行股份。深入了解这个问题可能是有价值的。如果相关方,例如内部人员,对这些私营公司中的某一家有利益关系,则应在年度报告中披露。私营公司也可能对该公司有战略利益。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Hengtong Logistics better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Hengtong Logistics you should know about.
始终值得考虑拥有公司股份的不同群体。但为了更好地理解恒通股份,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。 例如,考虑风险。每家公司都有这些风险,我们已经发现了恒通股份需要注意的一个警告信号。
If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.
如果你更倾向于查看另一家公司——一家有潜在优越财务状况的公司——那么请不要错过这份由强大财务数据支持的有趣公司免费名单。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。