share_log

With 74% Ownership of the Shares, Lockheed Martin Corporation (NYSE:LMT) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

With 74% Ownership of the Shares, Lockheed Martin Corporation (NYSE:LMT) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

洛克希德马丁公司(纽交所:LMT)拥有74%的股份,受到机构投资者的强烈主导。
Simply Wall St ·  2024/12/31 22:01

Key Insights

关键洞察

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Lockheed Martin's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 8 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 显著的高机构持股意味着洛克希德马丁的股价对他们的交易行为非常敏感。
  • 共有8位投资者在公司中拥有51%的多数股份。
  • 通过分析师预测数据和所有权研究,可以更好地评估公司的未来表现。

If you want to know who really controls Lockheed Martin Corporation (NYSE:LMT), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 74% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道谁真正控制洛克希德马丁公司(纽交所:LMT),那么你需要查看其股东名册的构成。持有公司最多股份的群体,大约占74%,是机构。换句话说,这个群体在对公司的投资中有最大的收益(或最大的损失)。

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

由于机构拥有巨额资本,他们的市场动作往往受到零售或个人投资者的密切关注。因此,投资于公司的机构资金通常被视为对其未来的巨大信心投票。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Lockheed Martin, beginning with the chart below.

让我们深入研究洛克希德马丁的每种股东类型,从下面的图表开始。

big
NYSE:LMT Ownership Breakdown December 31st 2024
纽交所: 洛克希德马丁 股权分布 2024年12月31日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Lockheed Martin?

机构持股给我们关于洛克希德马丁的哪些提示?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构的表现与近似当地市场的指数进行比较。因此,他们通常更加关注那些被纳入主要指数的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Lockheed Martin. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Lockheed Martin, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

正如你所看到的,机构投资者在洛克希德马丁中拥有相当的股份。这表明在专业投资者中有一定的信誉。但是,我们不能仅仅依赖这一事实,因为机构有时候也会做出不良投资,就像其他人一样。如果两家大型机构投资者同时试图抛售股票,股价大幅下跌并不罕见。因此,检查洛克希德马丁的历史盈利轨迹是值得的(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

big
NYSE:LMT Earnings and Revenue Growth December 31st 2024
纽交所:洛克希德马丁 2024年12月31日的营业收入和增长

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Lockheed Martin. The company's largest shareholder is State Street Global Advisors, Inc., with ownership of 15%. Lockheed Martin Corporation, ESOP is the second largest shareholder owning 11% of common stock, and The Vanguard Group, Inc. holds about 9.1% of the company stock.

投资者应该注意,机构实际上拥有超过一半的公司,因此他们可以共同发挥重要作用。 对冲基金在洛克希德马丁的股份不多。 该公司的最大股东是道富银行全球顾问公司,持有15%的股份。 洛克希德马丁公司,员工持股计划是第二大股东,拥有11%的普通股,而先锋集团约持有9.1%的公司股份。

We did some more digging and found that 8 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我们进行了更多的挖掘,发现前8大股东大约占登记的51%,这意味着除了较大的股东外,还有一些较小的股东,从而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

虽然研究公司的机构持股数据是合理的,但研究分析师意见也很有意义,以了解趋势如何。相当多的分析师覆盖了这只股票,因此你可以很轻松地查看预期增长。

Insider Ownership Of Lockheed Martin

洛克希德马丁的内部所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

内部人的定义在不同国家之间可能会略有不同,但董事会成员始终算作内部人。公司管理层向董事会负责,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也在董事会中。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部持股是积极的,因为这表明董事会与其他股东保持良好的一致性。然而,在某些情况下,权力在这个群体中过于集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Lockheed Martin Corporation. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$58m worth of shares (at current prices). It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我们最新的数据表明,内部人士持有的洛克希德马丁公司的股份不到1%。这是一家非常大的公司,因此看到内部人士持有公司的大比例股份是令人惊讶的。尽管他们的持股比例不到1%,我们可以看到董事会成员共同持有价值5800万美元的股份(按当前价格计算)。看到至少一些内部人士的持股总是好的,但可能值得检查一下这些内部人士是否在卖出。

General Public Ownership

公众持股

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 14% stake in Lockheed Martin. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

普通大众,通常是个体投资者,持有洛克希德马丁公司14%的股份。虽然这个群体不能完全掌控决策,但它确实可以对公司运营产生真实的影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Lockheed Martin .

我发现查看公司究竟由谁拥有非常有趣。但要真正获得洞察,我们还需要考虑其他信息。 为此,你应该注意到我们发现的洛克希德马丁的一个警告信号。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您想了解分析师对未来增长的预测,请不要错过这份关于分析师预测的免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发