Retail Investors Are Chengdu Yunda Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300440) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped CN¥387m
Retail Investors Are Chengdu Yunda Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300440) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped CN¥387m
Key Insights
关键洞察
- The considerable ownership by retail investors in Chengdu Yunda Technology indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- A total of 10 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- Institutions own 11% of Chengdu Yunda Technology
- 零售投资者在运达科技的显著持股表明,他们在管理和业务策略上集体拥有更大的发言权
- 共有10位投资者持有公司超过50%的股份
- 机构持有运达科技11%的股份
Every investor in Chengdu Yunda Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300440) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that retail investors own the lion's share in the company with 47% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
每位在运达科技有限公司(深交所代码:300440)的投资者都应了解最强大的股东群体。我们可以看到,零售投资者在公司中拥有47%的股份占比。换句话说,该群体在对公司的投资中将获得最多(或失去最多)的收益。
And last week, retail investors endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 11%.
上周,散户投资者面临了最大的损失,因为股票下跌了11%。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Chengdu Yunda Technology.
在下面的图表中,我们聚焦于运达科技的不同股东群体。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Chengdu Yunda Technology?
机构持股对我们了解运达科技有什么启示?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构的表现与近似当地市场的指数进行比较。因此,他们通常更加关注那些被纳入主要指数的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Chengdu Yunda Technology. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Chengdu Yunda Technology, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
正如您所看到的,机构投资者在运达科技中拥有相当的股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师关注了这只股票,并且喜欢它。但是就像其他人一样,他们也可能是错的。如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图卖出一只股票,股价大幅下跌是很常见的。因此,值得查看运达科技过去的盈利轨迹(如下所示)。当然,记住还有其他因素需要考虑。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Chengdu Yunda Technology. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Yunda Innovative (Chengdu) Investment Co., Ltd. with 34% of shares outstanding. With 5.5% and 5.0% of the shares outstanding respectively, Wanglong Li and Hengqin Guangjin Meihao Fund Management Co., Ltd. are the second and third largest shareholders.
我们注意到对运达科技的对冲基金没有进行有意义的投资。根据我们的数据,最大股东是运达创新(成都)投资有限公司,持有34%的流通股。王龙和横琴广金美昊基金管理有限公司分别持有5.5%和5.0%的流通股,分别是第二和第三大股东。
We did some more digging and found that 10 of the top shareholders account for roughly 50% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.
我们进行了一些深入调查,发现十大股东大约占注册股份的50%,这意味着除了大股东之外,还有一些小股东,从而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.
虽然研究公司的机构持股能为您的研究增值,但研究分析师的建议也是一种良好的做法,可以更深入地了解股票的预期表现。我们目前没有发现任何分析师对该股票的覆盖,因此该公司不太可能被广泛持有。
Insider Ownership Of Chengdu Yunda Technology
运达科技的内部持股
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
内部人的定义在不同国家之间可能会略有不同,但董事会成员始终算作内部人。公司管理层向董事会负责,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也在董事会中。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人拥有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情况下,这使得其他股东更难让董事会对决策负责。
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Chengdu Yunda Technology Co., Ltd.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own CN¥193m worth of the CN¥3.3b company. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
股东们可能会感兴趣地了解到,内部人士拥有运达科技有限公司的股份。作为个体,内部人士总共拥有价值19300万元人民币的股份,而该公司市值为33亿元人民币。有些人会说这显示了股东与董事会之间的利益一致。但值得查看的是这些内部人士是否有在卖出股份。
General Public Ownership
公众持股
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 47% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
公众——包括散户投资者——拥有公司47%的股份,因此无法轻易被忽视。 尽管这种所有权比例相当可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不一致,可能不足以改变公司政策。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司所有权
We can see that Private Companies own 36%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我们可以看到,私营公司持有36%的流通股份。仅凭这一事实很难得出任何结论,因此值得研究一下这些私营公司的所有者。有时候,内部人士或其他相关方通过一家单独的私营公司对一家上市公司的股份感兴趣。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 4 warning signs with Chengdu Yunda Technology (at least 1 which is potentially serious) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
我发现研究谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。 例如,投资风险始终存在。我们已经确定了运达科技的4个警告信号(其中至少1个可能是严重的),理解这些信号应该成为您投资过程的一部分。
Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.
当然,您也可能会在其他地方找到一个绝佳的投资。请查看这个免费的有趣公司名单。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。