Institutional Investors May Overlook First Bancorp's (NASDAQ:FBNC) Recent US$90m Market Cap Drop as Long-term Gains Remain Positive
Institutional Investors May Overlook First Bancorp's (NASDAQ:FBNC) Recent US$90m Market Cap Drop as Long-term Gains Remain Positive
Key Insights
关键洞察
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies First Bancorp's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- 51% of the business is held by the top 14 shareholders
- Insiders have been selling lately
- 显著高的机构持有比例意味着第一万通金控的股票价格对其交易行为敏感
- 51%的业务由前14名股东持有
- 内部人士最近一直在卖出。
A look at the shareholders of First Bancorp (NASDAQ:FBNC) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 67% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
查看第一万通金控(纳斯达克:FBNC)的股东可以告诉我们哪个团体最具影响力。我们可以看到,机构在公司中拥有67%的股份。换句话说,该团体从他们对公司的投资中获得最大的收益(或承受最大的损失)。
Institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's market cap fell by US$90m last week. Still, the 22% one-year gains may have helped mitigate their overall losses. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.
机构投资者在上周公司市值下降9000万美元后遭受了最高损失。尽管如此,22%的年收益可能帮助缓解了他们的整体损失。然而,我们假设他们会在未来留意任何弱点。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of First Bancorp.
在下面的图表中,我们放大了第一万通金控的不同持股群体。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About First Bancorp?
机构持股告诉我们关于第一万通金控什么?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时,会与基准进行比较,因此一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常对该股票会更加热情。我们预期大多数公司在登记时都会有一些机构,尤其是当它们正在增长时。
We can see that First Bancorp does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at First Bancorp's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我们可以看到第一万通金控确实有机构投资者,他们持有相当一部分公司的股票。这表明专业投资者之间存在一定的可信度。但我们不能仅仅依靠这一事实,因为机构有时也会做出错误的投资,就像其他人一样。如果多个机构同时对某只股票改变看法,你可能会看到股价迅速下跌。因此,值得查看第一万通金控的盈利历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in First Bancorp. The company's largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc., with ownership of 15%. With 6.8% and 5.4% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and Dimensional Fund Advisors LP are the second and third largest shareholders.
投资者应该注意,机构实际上拥有公司一半以上的股份,因此他们可以集体发挥重要的权力。我们注意到对第一万通金控的对冲基金没有进行有意义的投资。公司最大的股东是贝莱德,拥有15%的股份。先锋集团和维度基金顾问分别拥有6.8%和5.4%的流通股,因此是第二和第三大股东。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 14 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
经过进一步挖掘,我们发现前14名股东在公司中的合计持股为51%,这表明没有单一股东对公司具有显著控制权。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.
虽然研究一家公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解方向也是有意义的。该股票的分析师覆盖面较小,但并不多,因此还有空间获得更多的覆盖。
Insider Ownership Of First Bancorp
第一万通金控的内部持股
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
虽然内部人的精确定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员都是内部人。管理层最终要向董事会负责。然而,管理者成为执行董事会成员并不罕见,尤其是在他们是创始人或首席执行官的情况下。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部持股显示领导层像真正的公司所有者一样思考时,这是积极的。然而,高比例的内部持股也可能给予公司内部小团体巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in First Bancorp. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$64m. Most would see this as a real positive. Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我们最近的数据表明,内部人士持有第一万通金控的一些股票。这些内部人士的股份价值达6400万美元。大多数人认为这非常积极。大多数人会说这表明股东和董事会之间的利益一致。不过,值得检查一下这些内部人士是否在卖出。
General Public Ownership
公众持股
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 30% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
公众——包括散户投资者——在公司中拥有30%的股份,因此无法轻易忽视。这种规模的所有权虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不一致,可能不足以改变公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand First Bancorp better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - First Bancorp has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
考虑拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得的。但为了更好地了解第一万通金控,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。 以风险为例 - 第一万通金控有一个警告信号,我们认为您应该注意。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最终,决定这个业务的所有者表现如何的,是未来而不是过去。因此,我们认为查看这份免费的报告是明智的,报告显示分析师是否预测了一个更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。