share_log

The D. E. Shaw Group Releases Open Letter to the Board of Directors of Air Products and Chemicals

The D. E. Shaw Group Releases Open Letter to the Board of Directors of Air Products and Chemicals

D. E. Shaw集团向空气产品及化学品公司的董事会发布公开信
PR Newswire ·  01/03 05:00

Expresses Disappointment with the Board's Failure to Manage an Effective CEO Succession Process

对董事会未能有效管理首席执行官继任过程表示失望

Announces Intention to Support Change at the 2025 Annual Meeting

宣布将在2025年年度会议上支持变革的意图

NEW YORK, Jan. 3, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- The D. E. Shaw group ("D. E. Shaw"), a global investment and technology development firm with more than $65 billion in investment capital and a history of working with companies to help build long-term value, today sent an open letter to the Board of Directors of Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (NYSE: APD) (the "Company" or "Air Products") expressing continued disappointment with the Board's failure to manage an effective CEO succession process.

纽约,2025年1月3日/PRNewswire/ -- D.E. Shaw集团("D.E. Shaw"),一家全球投资和科技开发公司,拥有超过650亿的投资资本,并且有与公司合作以帮助建立长期价值的历史,今天向空气产品与化学品公司(NYSE: APD)("公司"或"空气产品")的董事会发出了公开信,表达了对董事会未能有效管理首席执行官继任过程的持续失望。

The text of today's open letter to the Board follows:

今天致董事会的公开信内容如下:

View PDF
D.E. Shaw Jan. 3rd Letter to APD Board of Directors
查看PDF
D.E. Shaw 1月3日致APD董事会的信件

Board of Directors
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.
1940 Air Products Boulevard
Allentown, PA 18106-5500

董事会
空气产品与化学公司
1940空气产品大道
宾夕法尼亚州阿伦镇, PA 18106-5500

Dear Members of the Board:

尊敬的董事会成员:

We are writing to express our continued disappointment in your failure to address shortcomings in Air Products' corporate governance that have led to a multi-year pattern of value destruction driven by the Company's current CEO, Seifi Ghasemi.

我们写信表示对你们未能解决空气产品公司企业治理缺陷的持续失望,这导致了由公司现任CEO Seifi Ghasemi 引发的多年价值破坏模式。

Mr. Ghasemi's seemingly unfettered decision-making authority, for which the Board is directly responsible, has led to the Company's high risk capital allocation strategy and longstanding share price underperformance relative to industry benchmarks. For years, Mr. Ghasemi appears to have gone virtually unchecked as he normalized the practice of committing to multi-billion-dollar projects without securing offtake partners—an uncharacteristically risky strategy for an industrial gas company—leading to billions of shareholder value destruction in the process. It was no surprise, then, to see Air Products' share price respond favorably to the prospect of a shareholder-driven change in leadership and strategy, nor was it a surprise to see the share price subsequently give back a substantial portion of its gains relative to peers and the broader market as it became clear that the Board was determined to resist value-enhancing change.1

Ghasemi先生似乎不受限制的决策权,董事会对此直接负责,导致了公司高风险的资本分配策略,以及长期以来,股价相对于行业基准的表现不佳。多年来,Ghasemi先生似乎几乎没有受到制约,他将承诺数十亿美元项目的做法常态化,而没有确保销售合作伙伴——这对于一家工业气体公司而言是一个不寻常的高风险策略——从而导致了数十亿股东价值的损失。因此,看到空气产品公司的股价对股东推动的领导和策略变革的前景作出积极反应并不令人惊讶,但当董事会坚定阻止增值变革时,股价随后相对于同行公司和更广泛市场回吐 substantial 部分收益也并不意外。

Holding a CEO accountable for their performance and planning for their succession are among the most important responsibilities of any Board. Indeed, the Company's Corporate Governance Guidelines list succession first among the Board's functions, specifying that the Board is responsible for "selecting, evaluating, compensating and planning for the succession of the CEO."2 This Board is failing at its core responsibilities, which, in our view, is a direct contributor to the substantial underperformance in the Company's shares over a multi-year period.

追究CEO绩效并为其接班做好计划是任何董事会最重要的职责之一。事实上,公司的企业治理指南将接班计划列为董事会职能中的第一项,规定董事会负责“选择、评估、补偿和规划CEO的接班”。这个董事会在其核心责任上失败了,在我们看来,这是公司股票在多年期间大幅表现不佳的直接原因。

Failed Succession Process Contributes to Longstanding Underperformance

失败的接班流程助长了长期表现不佳

In our meeting with members of the Board in October 2024, and in materials we delivered to the Board before that meeting, we expressed our grave concern with the Company's CEO succession process.

在2024年10月与董事会成员的会议中,以及在会上之前我们向董事会提交的材料中,我们表达了对公司CEO接班流程的严重关切。

First, the Board appears to have initially ceded control of the Company's succession process to the Company's current CEO, Seifi Ghasemi. In August 2024, Mr. Ghasemi, indicated that he—not the Board—was undertaking succession planning: "I have decided to bring into the company [my]... successor." As if to underscore the point, he added, "I have started this process."3 Worse still, Mr. Ghasemi characterized his leading role as good governance.4

首先,董事会似乎最初将公司的接班人过程控制权交给了公司现任首席执行官Seifi Ghasemi。2024年8月,Ghasemi先生表示, he——不是董事会——正在进行接班人规划:"I 已经决定带入公司[我的]...接班人。"仿佛为强调这一点,他补充道,"I 已经开始了这个过程。"更糟的是,Ghasemi先生将他主导的角色描述为良好的治理。

Second, the Board has failed to provide a clear timeline for transitioning the CEO role (and for Mr. Ghasemi's retirement)—which is particularly concerning given Mr. Ghasemi's age and his Board-approved evergreen employment contract. Despite being the second-oldest CEO in the S&P 500 (and oldest without a named successor), Mr. Ghasemi made clear that a leadership transition was not imminent, stating that he "fully intend[ed] to continue leading Air Products"5 and that a leadership transition would occur only "if something unexpected were to happen"6 to him.

其次,董事会未能提供首席执行官角色转移的明确时间表(以及Ghasemi先生退休的时间表)——鉴于Ghasemi先生的年龄及其董事会批准的永久就业合同,这尤其令人担忧。尽管Ghasemi先生是S&P 500中第二年长的首席执行官(没有指定接班人的最高年龄),但他明确表示领导层的过渡并不迫在眉睫,称他"完全打算继续领导Air Products",并表示领导层的过渡只会在"如果发生意外情况"6时才会发生。

The Board, not Mr. Ghasemi, should have firm and direct control of this process and its timing. That is why, in our meeting in October, we urged the Board to take a central role by publicly disclosing its approach and timeline for CEO succession. Nearly three months have gone by since our meeting and no such details have been disclosed.

董事会,而不是Ghasemi先生,应该对这一过程及其时间有明确和直接的控制。这就是为什么在我们十月份的会议中,我们敦促董事会公开披露其首席执行官继任的方针和时间表。自我们会议以来已经过去近三个月,但没有披露任何此类细节。

The Board Has Continued to Give Shareholders Inadequate Information Regarding Succession

董事会持续提供不足够的信息给股东关于继任的问题

In its 64-page investor presentation released in conjunction with the ongoing proxy contest, the Company devoted just a single slide to the topic of CEO succession. And while the Company has indicated that it "anticipates" announcing a "new President" no later than March 31, 2025, the Company still has not provided a timeline for appointing a new CEO or for Mr. Ghasemi's retirement.

在与正在进行的委托争夺战相关的64页投资者演示文稿中,公司仅用一张幻灯片讨论首席执行官继任的话题。尽管公司表示“预计”在2025年3月31日前将宣布一位“新主席”,但公司仍未提供任命新首席执行官或Ghasemi先生退休的时间表。

Shareholders should not have to wait until after casting their votes at the Annual Meeting to learn when the Board intends to name a new CEO and whether the Board intends for Mr. Ghasemi to remain on the Board (e.g., as Executive Chairman) or fully retire. Indeed, despite the brief attention given to this topic in the Company's presentation, future leadership of the Company and the process by which the Board will identify and recruit that new leader is the key issue in our view for shareholders to consider as they cast their ballots. Shareholders should have been given ample time before the Annual Meeting to evaluate the CEO candidate and succession timeline proposed by the Board and to make an informed judgment.

股东不应在年度会议投票后等待,才能了解董事会打算何时任命新首席执行官,以及董事会是否打算让Ghasemi先生继续留在董事会(例如,担任执行董事长)或完全退休。事实上,尽管在公司演示中对这个话题给予的关注很少,但我们认为,公司未来的领导层以及董事会将如何识别和招募新领导者的过程是股东在投票时考虑的关键问题。股东在年度会议之前应有充足的时间评估董事会提议的首席执行官候选人和继任时间表,以便做出明智的判断。

Large Air Products shareholders have publicly highlighted that CEO succession is a critical function for any board

Vanguard

9.6% ownership

"One of the most important responsibilities of a board is to select and appoint a company's EO. When we identify that a board has not appropriately carried out its responsibilities... regarding CEO succession planning... the funds may not support the election of relevant directors to express governance and oversight concerns"

- Vanguard Investment Stewardship Voting Insights, June 2023

State Street

4.3% ownership

"In order to carry out their primary responsibilities, directors undertake activities that include...selecting the CEO and other senior executives... creating a succession plan for the board and management"

- State Street Global Proxy Voting and Engagement Policy, March 2024

BlackRock

8.0% ownership

"Companies should have a robust CEO and senior management succession plan in place at the board level that is reviewed and updated on a regular basis... Where there is significant concern regarding the board's succession planning efforts, we may vote against members of the responsible committee..."

- BlackRock Proxy Voting Guidelines for U.S. securities, 2024

J.P. Morgan

2.7% ownership

"The responsibilities of the [Nominating] Committee should include... maintaining formal and transparent arrangements for succession planning at the... senior management level."

- JP Morgan Asset Management, Corporate Governance Principles and Proxy Voting Guidelines, February 2021

Note(s):
•Source: Bloomberg, Buy-side proxy voting policies

大型空气产品的股东公开强调,首席执行官的继任是任何董事会的一项关键职能。

先锋

9.6%的股权

“作为董事会最重要的职责之一是选拔和任命公司的首席执行官 当我们发现某个董事会未能适当履行其职责,关于首席执行官接班计划时, 所有基金类型可能不会支持相关董事的选举,以表达治理和监督的关注"

- 先锋投资管理投票洞察,2023年6月

State Street

4.3%的股份

"为了履行他们的主要职责,董事进行的活动包括...选择首席执行官和其他高级管理人员... 制定董事会和管理层的继任计划"

- 道富银行全球代理投票和参与政策,2024年3月

贝莱德

8.0% 的股份

“公司应该 在董事会层面制定一个强有力的CEO和高级管理层接班计划 并定期进行审查和更新... 如果对董事会的接班计划存在重大担忧,我们可能会投票反对负责委员会的成员..."

- 贝莱德2024年美国证券代理投票指南

摩根大通

2.7%的所有权

"[提名]委员会的职责应包括... 在......高层管理层维持正式和透明的接班计划安排."

- 摩根大通资产管理公司,企业治理原则及代理投票指南,2021年2月

注:
•来源:彭博,买方代理投票政策

Path Forward Requires Substantial Board and Leadership Change

前进的道路需要实质性的董事会和领导层变更

It appears to us that the incumbent directors have failed to develop, oversee, and communicate a timely and appropriate succession process and should not be entrusted to oversee this critical function. There is no doubt that the timing and selection of a new executive leader will have profound implications for the Company, its strategy, and its capital allocation going forward. Mr. Ghasemi has been given too much authority, and the Board has remained too passive and abdicated its responsibility to shareholders.

我们认为,现任董事未能开发、监督并传达及时且适当的接班流程,不应被委以监督这一关键职能的责任。毫无疑问,新任执行领导者的时间和选择将对公司、其策略以及未来的资本配置产生深远影响。Ghasemi先生被赋予了过多权力,而董事会则过于被动,放弃了对股东的责任。

Change in the Board's composition, including Mr. Ghasemi's retirement from it, is urgently needed to ensure the Board properly fulfills this most important function.

董事会的组成变化,包括Ghasemi先生的退休,是确保董事会妥当地履行这一最重要职能的紧迫需要。

The status quo, in our view, exposes shareholders to the risk of continued lapses in oversight, a protracted leadership transition, and the suboptimal selection of a successor all of which will likely lead to continued share price underperformance.

我们认为,现状使股东面临持续监督失效、漫长的领导过渡以及继任者选择不当的风险,这些都可能导致股价继续低迷。

Therefore, we intend to support change in the Board's composition at Air Products' 2025 Annual Meeting.

因此,我们打算在艾尔产品公司2025年年度会议上支持董事会组成的变更。

Best Regards,

祝好,

Edwin Jager
Managing Director
D. E. Shaw & Co., L.P.

埃德温·雅格
常务董事
D. E. Shaw & Co., L.P.

Michael O'Mary
Managing Director
D. E. Shaw & Co., L.P.

迈克尔·奥玛里
常务董事
D. E. Shaw & Co., L.P.

About the D. E. Shaw Group

关于D.E.肖集团

The D. E. Shaw group is a global investment and technology development firm with more than $65 billion in investment capital as of December 1, 2024, and offices in North America, Europe, and Asia. Since our founding in 1988, our firm has earned a reputation for successful investing based on innovation, careful risk management, and the quality and depth of our staff. We have a significant presence in the world's capital markets, investing in a wide range of companies and financial instruments in both developed and developing economies. For more information, please visit .

D.E.肖集团是一家全球投资和技术开发公司,截至2024年12月1日,投资资本超过650亿美元,在北美、欧洲和亚洲设有办事处。自1988年成立以来,我们公司因创新、谨慎的风险管理以及员工的质量和深度而赢得了成功投资的声誉。我们在全球资本市场上占有重要地位,投资于已发展和发展经济体中各种公司的金融工具。欲了解更多信息,请访问。

This letter reflects the opinions of D. E. Shaw & Co., L.P. ("DESCO LP") on behalf of certain investment funds managed or advised by it that currently beneficially own, or otherwise have an economic interest in, shares of Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (the "Company" or "APD"). This letter is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice or convey an offer or solicitation of any type with respect to any securities or other financial products. The views expressed in this letter are expressed as of the date hereof and are based on publicly available information and DESCO LP's analyses. This letter contains statements reflecting DESCO LP's opinions and beliefs with respect to the Company and its business based on DESCO LP's research, analysis, and experience; all such statements are based on DESCO LP's opinion and belief, whether or not those statements are expressly so qualified. DESCO LP acknowledges that the Company may possess information that could lead the Company to disagree with DESCO LP's views and/or analyses. Nothing contained in this letter may be relied upon as a guarantee, promise, assurance, or representation as to future events. The investment funds managed or advised by DESCO LP are in the business of trading (i.e., buying and selling) securities, and it is expected that they will from time to time engage in transactions that result in changes to their beneficial and/or economic interest in the Company.

本信函反映了D.E.肖公司("DESCO LP")代表当前有利益拥有或以其他方式对空气产品及化学品公司("公司"或"APD")的股份有经济利益的某些投资基金的观点。本信函仅供参考,并不构成投资建议或传达任何类型的证券或其他金融产品的要约或招揽。本信函中表达的观点基于公开可用的信息和DESCO LP的分析,截止本函日期。这封信包含了反映DESCO LP就公司及其业务的观点和信念的声明,基于DESCO LP的研究、分析和经验;所有此类声明均基于DESCO LP的意见和信念,无论这些声明是否被明确如此限定。DESCO LP承认公司可能拥有能使其与DESCO LP的观点和/或分析发生分歧的信息。本信函中的任何内容皆不可视为对未来事件的保证、承诺、保证或陈述。由DESCO LP管理或建议的投资基金从事证券交易(即买入和卖出),预计他们将不时进行交易,导致其在公司的有利和/或经济利益发生变化。

Media Contact
Prosek Partners
Brian Schaffer / Kiki Tarkhan
[email protected]

媒体联系
Prosek Partners
布赖恩·沙弗 / 基基·塔尔汗
[email protected]

1Air Products' share price has underperformed industrial gas peer companies and the broader market by 6% and 12%, respectively, in just over a month since Air Products filed its preliminary proxy materials recommending against shareholder board nominees.
2See Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. Corporate Governance Guidelines, Amended February 3, 2022.
3Source: Air Products and Chemicals Q3 2024 Earnings Call transcript, August 1, 2024.
4Id.
5Id.
6Id.

1空气产品的股价在短短一个多月内,分别低于工业气体同行公司和更加广泛市场6%和12%,这是因为空气产品提交了初步代理材料,反对股东董事提名。
2请参阅空气产品和化学品公司企业治理准则,修订于2022年2月3日。
3来源:空气产品和化学品第三季度2024业绩会记录,2024年8月1日。
4同上。
5Id.
6Id.

SOURCE The D.E. Shaw Group

SOURCE The D.E. Shaw Group

WANT YOUR COMPANY'S NEWS FEATURED ON PRNEWSWIRE.COM?

想让贵公司的资讯在PRNEWSWIRE.COM上特色展示吗?

440k+
440k+

Newsrooms &
新闻编辑室和

Influencers
意见领袖
9k+
9k+

Digital Media
数字媒体

Outlets
Outlets
270k+
270k+

Journalists
记者

Opted In
已选择加入
GET STARTED
开始
声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发