Is LGI Homes (NASDAQ:LGIH) A Risky Investment?
Is LGI Homes (NASDAQ:LGIH) A Risky Investment?
Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. As with many other companies LGI Homes, Inc. (NASDAQ:LGIH) makes use of debt. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?
一些人说,波动性而不是债务是投资者思考风险的最佳方式,但沃伦·巴菲特曾 famously 说过“波动性远非与风险同义。” 当我们考虑一家公司的风险时,我们总是喜欢查看它的债务使用情况,因为债务过重可能导致毁灭。与许多其他公司一样,LGI Homes, Inc. (纳斯达克:LGIH) 也使用了债务。但这种债务会对股东构成担忧吗?
What Risk Does Debt Bring?
债务带来了什么风险?
Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.
一般来说,债务只有在公司无法轻松偿还时才会成为真正的问题,无论是通过筹集资金还是依靠自身的现金流。在最坏的情况下,如果一家公司无法支付其债权人,它可能会破产。虽然这并不常见,但我们常常看到负债公司因为贷方迫使它们以低价融资,从而永久稀释股东的权益。当然,债务在企业中可以是一种重要工具,尤其是在资金密集型企业中。当我们审视债务水平时,我们首先考虑现金和债务水平。
How Much Debt Does LGI Homes Carry?
lgi homes负债到底有多少?
You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of September 2024 LGI Homes had US$1.55b of debt, an increase on US$1.19b, over one year. However, it also had US$60.9m in cash, and so its net debt is US$1.49b.
您可以点击下面的图形查看历史数据,但它显示截至2024年9月,LGI Homes的债务为15.5亿美元,比去年增加了11.9亿美元。然而,它也有6090万美元的现金,因此其净债务为14.9亿美元。

How Strong Is LGI Homes' Balance Sheet?
LGI Homes的资产负债表有多强?
Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that LGI Homes had liabilities of US$133.5m due within 12 months and liabilities of US$1.70b due beyond that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$60.9m as well as receivables valued at US$49.0m due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$1.72b.
仔细查看最新的资产负债表数据,我们可以看到LGI Homes在12个月内的负债为13350万美元,超过12个月的负债为17亿美元。为了抵消这些负债,它拥有6090万美元的现金,以及价值4900万美元的应收账款,这些账款在12个月内到期。因此,它的负债总额超出了现金和(短期)应收账款之和的17.2亿美元。
This deficit is considerable relative to its market capitalization of US$2.10b, so it does suggest shareholders should keep an eye on LGI Homes' use of debt. This suggests shareholders would be heavily diluted if the company needed to shore up its balance sheet in a hurry.
考虑到其21亿美元的市值,这一赤字是相当可观的,因此它确实表明股东应该关注LGI Homes的债务使用。这表明如果公司需要迅速改善资产负债表,股东将面临严重稀释。
We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.
我们使用两个主要比率来了解相对于收益的债务水平。第一个是净债务除以息税折旧摊销前利润(EBITDA),而第二个是它的息税前利润(EBIT)覆盖其利息支出的次数(或者简称为利息覆盖率)。这样,我们同时考虑债务的绝对数量以及所支付的利率。
Strangely LGI Homes has a sky high EBITDA ratio of 6.4, implying high debt, but a strong interest coverage of 1k. So either it has access to very cheap long term debt or that interest expense is going to grow! LGI Homes grew its EBIT by 4.2% in the last year. That's far from incredible but it is a good thing, when it comes to paying off debt. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if LGI Homes can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.
奇怪的是,LGI Homes的EBITDA比率高达6.4,暗示着高债务,但利息覆盖率只有0.1万。因此,它要么获得了非常便宜的长期债务,要么利息支出将会增加!LGI Homes在过去一年中EBIT增长了4.2%。虽然这远不算Incredible,但在偿还债务方面是好事。我们无疑从资产负债表上学到最多的债务知识。但最终,公司的未来盈利能力将决定LGI Homes是否能够随着时间的推移来强化其资产负债表。因此,如果你关注未来,可以查看这份免费的报告,其中显示了分析师的盈利预测。
Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. During the last three years, LGI Homes burned a lot of cash. While that may be a result of expenditure for growth, it does make the debt far more risky.
最后,一家公司只能用冷硬的现金而不是会计利润来偿还债务。因此,逻辑上的一步是查看EBIT中与实际自由现金流匹配的比例。在过去三年中,LGI Homes消耗了大量现金。虽然这可能是增长支出的结果,但这确实使得债务风险大大增加。
Our View
我们的观点
On the face of it, LGI Homes's net debt to EBITDA left us tentative about the stock, and its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow was no more enticing than the one empty restaurant on the busiest night of the year. But on the bright side, its interest cover is a good sign, and makes us more optimistic. Overall, we think it's fair to say that LGI Homes has enough debt that there are some real risks around the balance sheet. If all goes well, that should boost returns, but on the flip side, the risk of permanent capital loss is elevated by the debt. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for LGI Homes that you should be aware of before investing here.
表面上看,LGI Homes的净债务与EBITDA的比率让我们对这只股票感到犹豫,而其EBIT转换为自由现金流的比例不比一年中最繁忙的夜晚那家空荡荡的餐厅更具吸引力。 但从积极的方面来看,其利息覆盖率是一个好迹象,使我们更加乐观。 总体来说,我们认为可以公平地说,LGI Homes的债务足够多,财务报表周围存在一些真实风险。如果一切顺利,这应该会提高回报,但另一方面,债务增加了永久性资本损失的风险。毫无疑问,我们从财务报表中对债务的了解最多。然而,并非所有投资风险都存在于财务报表中——远非如此。例如,我们发现了一个LGI Homes的警告信号,在您在此投资之前务必了解。
When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.
无论最终结果如何,有时候更容易关注那些根本不需要债务的公司。读者可以立即免费获取一份净债务为零的成长股列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。