share_log

Starbucks Corporation (NASDAQ:SBUX) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 78% of the Company

Starbucks Corporation (NASDAQ:SBUX) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 78% of the Company

星巴克-T (纳斯达克:SBUX) 受到持有公司78%股份的机构投资者的青睐
Simply Wall St ·  01/06 20:53

Key Insights

关键洞察

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Starbucks' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 显著高的机构持股意味着星巴克的股价对他们的交易行为很敏感
  • 共有25位投资者在公司中拥有大部分股份,持股比例达到50%。
  • 通过分析师预测数据和所有权研究,可以更好地评估公司的未来表现。

A look at the shareholders of Starbucks Corporation (NASDAQ:SBUX) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 78% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看看星巴克-T(纳斯达克:SBUX)的股东,可以告诉我们哪个集团最有权力。我们可以看到,机构在公司中拥有78%的股份。换句话说,这个集团将从对公司的投资中获得最多(或者失去最多)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

考虑到他们掌握的巨额资金和研究能力,机构持股往往具有重要影响力,特别是在个人投资者中。因此,投资于公司的大部分机构资金通常是对其未来的巨大信任投票。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Starbucks, beginning with the chart below.

让我们更深入地探讨一下星巴克的每种所有者类型,从下面的图表开始。

big
NasdaqGS:SBUX Ownership Breakdown January 6th 2025
纳斯达克:SBUX 所有权分解 2025年1月6日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Starbucks?

机构持有量告诉我们星巴克的什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时,会与基准进行比较,因此一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常对该股票会更加热情。我们预期大多数公司在登记时都会有一些机构,尤其是当它们正在增长时。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Starbucks. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Starbucks' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如你所看到的,机构投资者在星巴克拥有相当多的股份。这可能表明该公司在投资界有一定的信誉。然而,最好小心不要过于依赖机构投资者带来的所谓验证。他们有时也会犯错。当多家机构共同持有一只股票时,始终存在他们处于“拥挤交易”的风险。当这样的交易出现问题时,多个方可能会竞争迅速卖出股票。这种风险在没有增长历史的公司中更高。你可以在下面看到星巴克的历史收入和营业收入,但请记住,总是有更多的故事。

big
NasdaqGS:SBUX Earnings and Revenue Growth January 6th 2025
纳斯达克交易所:星巴克 2025年1月6日的盈利与营业收入增长

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Starbucks. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 9.7%. With 6.8% and 5.2% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and Capital Research and Management Company are the second and third largest shareholders.

由于机构投资者拥有超过一半的已发行股票,董事会可能需要关注他们的偏好。对冲基金在星巴克的股份不多。公司的最大股东是先锋集团,持股9.7%。贝莱德和资本研究与管理公司分别以6.8%和5.2%的流通股份,成为第二和第三大股东。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 25 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

仔细查看我们的股权数据表明,前25大股东的合计持股比例为50%,这意味着没有单一股东拥有多数股权。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

虽然研究一家公司机构的所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的看法也同样重要,以了解市场的动态。很多分析师关注这只股票,因此查看他们的预测也可能是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of Starbucks

星巴克内部股权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

内部人的定义在不同国家之间可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是算作内部人。公司管理层负责运营业务,但首席执行官将向董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会的成员。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部持股显示领导层像真正的公司所有者一样思考时,这是积极的。然而,高比例的内部持股也可能给予公司内部小团体巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Starbucks Corporation. It is a very large company, and board members collectively own US$2.1b worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我们最近的数据表明,内部人拥有一些星巴克-T的股份。它是一家非常大的公司,董事会成员 collectively 拥有 21亿美元的股份(按照当前价格)。看到这种投资水平很不错。您可以在这里查看这些内部人是否最近有买入。

General Public Ownership

公众持股

With a 19% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Starbucks. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公众拥有 19% 的股份,主要由个人投资者组成,他们对星巴克有一定的影响力。虽然这一群体不一定能决定一切,但毫无疑问,他们对公司的运营有真正的影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Starbucks better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with Starbucks (at least 1 which makes us a bit uncomfortable) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

考虑到拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得思考的。但为了更好地理解星巴克,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。 例如,投资风险的时时存在的阴影。 我们已经发现了星巴克的两个警示信号(至少有一个让我们感到不安),理解这些信号应该是你投资过程的一部分。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最终,未来是最重要的。您可以访问此免费的关于公司分析师预测的报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发