Institutional Owners May Ignore General Motors Company's (NYSE:GM) Recent US$2.1b Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green
Institutional Owners May Ignore General Motors Company's (NYSE:GM) Recent US$2.1b Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green
Key Insights
关键洞察
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, General Motors' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- A total of 17 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Insiders have been selling lately
- 由于机构在股票中持有较大份额,通用汽车的股票价格可能会受到他们交易决策的影响。
- 共有17位投资者在该公司拥有51%的控股权。
- 内部人士最近一直在卖出。
If you want to know who really controls General Motors Company (NYSE:GM), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 87% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
如果你想知道谁真正控制了通用汽车公司(纽交所:GM),那么你需要查看其股东名册的组成。而持有最大份额的群体是机构,拥有87%的股份。换句话说,该群体面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
Institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$57b last week. However, the 43% one-year return to shareholders may have helped lessen their pain. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.
机构投资者是受到影响最大的群体,因为上周公司的市值降至570亿美元。然而,43%的年回报率可能帮助减轻了他们的损失。然而,他们应该对未来的进一步亏损保持警惕。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of General Motors, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入了解通用汽车每种所有者类型,从下面的图表开始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About General Motors?
机构持股告诉我们关于通用汽车什么?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构的表现与近似当地市场的指数进行比较。因此,他们通常更加关注那些被纳入主要指数的公司。
We can see that General Motors does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at General Motors' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我们可以看到通用汽车确实有机构投资者,他们持有公司股票的很大一部分。这可能表明该公司在投资社区中具有一定的信誉。然而,依赖于机构投资者带来的所谓验证是最好的保持警惕。他们有时也会犯错。如果多家机构同时改变对某只股票的看法,您可能会看到股价迅速下跌。因此,查看通用汽车的盈利历史是值得的。当然,未来才是真正重要的。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in General Motors. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 9.5% of shares outstanding. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 8.6% of common stock, and Capital Research and Management Company holds about 6.3% of the company stock.
由于机构投资者持有超过一半的发行股票,董事会可能需要关注他们的偏好。 对冲基金在通用汽车的股份并不多。 贝莱德公司目前是该公司最大的股东,持有9.5%的流通股。 先锋集团公司是第二大股东,持有8.6%的普通股,而资本研究与管理公司持有约6.3%的公司股票。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 17 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
经过更多调查,我们发现前17大股东在公司中的合计持股为51%,这表明没有单一股东对公司拥有显著控制权。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
虽然研究公司的机构持股数据是合理的,但研究分析师意见也很有意义,以了解趋势如何。相当多的分析师覆盖了这只股票,因此你可以很轻松地查看预期增长。
Insider Ownership Of General Motors
通用汽车的内部持股
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
虽然对内幕人的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内幕人。公司管理层向董事会负责,后者应该代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时候高层管理者自己也是董事会成员。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部持股显示领导层像真正的公司所有者一样思考时,这是积极的。然而,高比例的内部持股也可能给予公司内部小团体巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of General Motors Company in their own names. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$92m worth of shares (at current prices). In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我们的数据显示,内部人士以自己名义持有的通用汽车公司的股份低于1%。 这是一家非常大型的公司,因此内部人士持有公司较大比例的股份将是令人惊讶的。虽然他们的持有量低于1%,但我们可以看到董事会成员共同持有价值9200万美元的股票(按当前价格计算)。在这种情况下,更有趣的是看看这些内部人士是否在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
公众持股
With a 13% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over General Motors. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公众持有13%的股份,主要由个人投资者组成,因此在通用汽车上有一定的影响力。虽然这个群体不一定能够完全掌控局面,但它确实可以对公司如何运行产生实质性的影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for General Motors you should be aware of, and 2 of them are potentially serious.
我觉得确切了解谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是要真正获得洞见,我们还需要考虑其他信息。 举个例子:我们发现了 3 个警告信号关于通用汽车 你需要注意,其中 2 个可能是严重的。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您想了解分析师对未来增长的预测,请不要错过这份关于分析师预测的免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。