share_log

Jazz Pharmaceuticals Plc (NASDAQ:JAZZ) Delivered A Weaker ROE Than Its Industry

Jazz Pharmaceuticals Plc (NASDAQ:JAZZ) Delivered A Weaker ROE Than Its Industry

爵士制药公司(纳斯达克:JAZZ)的ROE低于其行业板块。
Simply Wall St ·  01/06 22:40

While some investors are already well versed in financial metrics (hat tip), this article is for those who would like to learn about Return On Equity (ROE) and why it is important. To keep the lesson grounded in practicality, we'll use ROE to better understand Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc (NASDAQ:JAZZ).

虽然一些投资者已经对财务指标非常熟悉(感谢),但本文是为那些希望了解净资产收益率(ROE)及其重要性的人准备的。为了使课程更具实用性,我们将使用ROE来更好地理解爵士制药有限公司(纳斯达克:JAZZ)。

Return on equity or ROE is an important factor to be considered by a shareholder because it tells them how effectively their capital is being reinvested. In simpler terms, it measures the profitability of a company in relation to shareholder's equity.

股本回报率或ROE是股东需要考虑的重要因素,因为它告诉他们自己的资本是如何有效地被再投资的。简单来说,它衡量的是公司相对于股东权益的盈利能力。

How To Calculate Return On Equity?

如何计算股东权益回报率?

ROE can be calculated by using the formula:

ROE可以通过以下公式计算:

Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity

股东权益回报率 = 净利润(来自持续运营)÷ 股东权益

So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Jazz Pharmaceuticals is:

所以,根据上述公式,爵士制药的roe为:

11% = US$463m ÷ US$4.2b (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2024).

11% = 46300万美元 ÷ 42亿(基于截至2024年9月的过去12个月数据)。

The 'return' is the amount earned after tax over the last twelve months. That means that for every $1 worth of shareholders' equity, the company generated $0.11 in profit.

“回报”是指过去十二个月税后赚取的金额。这意味着每1美元的股东权益,公司产生了0.11美元的利润。

Does Jazz Pharmaceuticals Have A Good ROE?

爵士制药的roe指标如何?

By comparing a company's ROE with its industry average, we can get a quick measure of how good it is. Importantly, this is far from a perfect measure, because companies differ significantly within the same industry classification. As is clear from the image below, Jazz Pharmaceuticals has a lower ROE than the average (21%) in the Pharmaceuticals industry.

通过将公司的ROE与行业平均水平进行比较,我们可以快速衡量其优秀程度。重要的是,这远非一个完美的衡量标准,因为同一行业分类中的公司差异很大。正如下面的图像所示,爵士制药的ROE低于制药行业的平均水平(21%)。

big
NasdaqGS:JAZZ Return on Equity January 6th 2025
纳斯达克GS:JAZZ 2025年1月6日的净资产收益率

Unfortunately, that's sub-optimal. However, a low ROE is not always bad. If the company's debt levels are moderate to low, then there's still a chance that returns can be improved via the use of financial leverage. When a company has low ROE but high debt levels, we would be cautious as the risk involved is too high. To know the 3 risks we have identified for Jazz Pharmaceuticals visit our risks dashboard for free.

不幸的是,这并不理想。然而,低ROE并不总是坏事。如果公司的债务水平适中或较低,那么仍然有可能通过利用财务杠杆来改善回报。当一家公司有低ROE但高债务水平时,我们会保持谨慎,因为风险太高。要了解我们为爵士制药识别的三个风险,请免费访问我们的风险仪表。

Why You Should Consider Debt When Looking At ROE

为什么在观察ROE时你应该考虑债务问题?

Virtually all companies need money to invest in the business, to grow profits. That cash can come from retained earnings, issuing new shares (equity), or debt. In the first two cases, the ROE will capture this use of capital to grow. In the latter case, the debt used for growth will improve returns, but won't affect the total equity. In this manner the use of debt will boost ROE, even though the core economics of the business stay the same.

几乎所有公司都需要资金来投资于业务,以增加利润。这笔资金可以来自留存收益、发行新股(权益)或债务。在前两种情况下,ROE将捕捉到这种利用资本增长的用途。在后者的情况下,用于增长的债务将改善回报,但不会影响总股本。通过这种方式,使用债务将提高ROE,即使业务的核心经济基本面保持不变。

Jazz Pharmaceuticals' Debt And Its 11% ROE

爵士制药的债务和其11%的ROE

It's worth noting the high use of debt by Jazz Pharmaceuticals, leading to its debt to equity ratio of 1.47. The combination of a rather low ROE and significant use of debt is not particularly appealing. Debt does bring extra risk, so it's only really worthwhile when a company generates some decent returns from it.

值得注意的是,爵士制药高比例的债务导致其债务与股本比率为1.47。相对较低的ROE和大量使用债务的组合并不是特别吸引人。债务确实带来额外风险,因此只有当公司从中获得相当可观的回报时才真正值得。

Conclusion

结论

Return on equity is a useful indicator of the ability of a business to generate profits and return them to shareholders. Companies that can achieve high returns on equity without too much debt are generally of good quality. If two companies have the same ROE, then I would generally prefer the one with less debt.

净资产收益率是评估企业盈利能力以及将利润回馈给股东的一个有用指标。能够在没有过多负债的情况下实现高净资产收益率的公司通常质量较高。如果两家公司具有相同的ROE,我通常会更偏好负债较少的那家。

But when a business is high quality, the market often bids it up to a price that reflects this. The rate at which profits are likely to grow, relative to the expectations of profit growth reflected in the current price, must be considered, too. So I think it may be worth checking this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

但是,当一项业务质量较高时,市场通常会将其价格抬高,反映出这一点。相对于当前价格中反映的利润增长预期,利润可能增长的速度也需要考虑。因此,我认为查看一下公司分析师预测的免费报告可能是值得的。

But note: Jazz Pharmaceuticals may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies with high ROE and low debt.

但是请注意:爵士制药可能不是最好买入的股票。所以看看这份有关高ROE和低债务的有趣公司的免费名单。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发