Keeson Technology's (SHSE:603610) Returns On Capital Not Reflecting Well On The Business
Keeson Technology's (SHSE:603610) Returns On Capital Not Reflecting Well On The Business
If we want to find a stock that could multiply over the long term, what are the underlying trends we should look for? Amongst other things, we'll want to see two things; firstly, a growing return on capital employed (ROCE) and secondly, an expansion in the company's amount of capital employed. Basically this means that a company has profitable initiatives that it can continue to reinvest in, which is a trait of a compounding machine. However, after briefly looking over the numbers, we don't think Keeson Technology (SHSE:603610) has the makings of a multi-bagger going forward, but let's have a look at why that may be.
如果我们想找到一只能够长期增值的股票,我们应该关注哪些基础趋势?除了其他因素外,我们首先要看到两个方面;首先是资本回报率(ROCE)的增长,其次是公司投入资本的扩大。基本上,这意味着公司有能够持续再投资的盈利项目,这是一个复合增长机器的特征。 然而,经过简单查看这些数据后,我们认为Keeson科技(SHSE:603610)未来并不具备成为多倍收益股的潜力,但让我们来看看原因。
What Is Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)?
什么是资本回报率(ROCE)?
For those who don't know, ROCE is a measure of a company's yearly pre-tax profit (its return), relative to the capital employed in the business. To calculate this metric for Keeson Technology, this is the formula:
对于那些不知道的人来说,ROCE是衡量公司每年的税前利润(回报)与业务投入资本的关系的一个指标。要计算Keeson科技的这个指标,公式是:
Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)
资本利用率 = 利息和税前利润(EBIT) ÷ (总资产 - 流动负债)
0.071 = CN¥255m ÷ (CN¥4.7b - CN¥1.1b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2024).
0.071 = CN¥25500万 ÷ (CN¥47亿 - CN¥1.1b)(基于截至2024年9月的过去十二个月数据)。
So, Keeson Technology has an ROCE of 7.1%. In absolute terms, that's a low return and it also under-performs the Consumer Durables industry average of 9.6%.
因此,Keeson科技的ROCE为7.1%。从绝对值上看,这是一个较低的回报,且也低于消费品行业平均水平9.6%。

In the above chart we have measured Keeson Technology's prior ROCE against its prior performance, but the future is arguably more important. If you'd like to see what analysts are forecasting going forward, you should check out our free analyst report for Keeson Technology .
在上述图表中,我们测量了Keeson科技之前的资本回报率(ROCE)与其过往表现的对比,但未来的表现显然更为重要。如果您想看到分析师对Keeson科技未来的预测,您应该查看我们的免费分析师报告。
The Trend Of ROCE
资本回报率(ROCE)的趋势
In terms of Keeson Technology's historical ROCE movements, the trend isn't fantastic. Around five years ago the returns on capital were 30%, but since then they've fallen to 7.1%. Meanwhile, the business is utilizing more capital but this hasn't moved the needle much in terms of sales in the past 12 months, so this could reflect longer term investments. It's worth keeping an eye on the company's earnings from here on to see if these investments do end up contributing to the bottom line.
就Keeson科技的历史资本回报率变化而言,趋势并不理想。大约五年前,资本回报率为30%,但此后已经下降至7.1%。与此同时,业务正在使用更多的资本,但过去12个月的销售额并没有显著变化,因此这可能反映了长期投资。从现在开始,值得关注该公司的盈利情况,看这些投资是否最终会贡献于净利润。
The Key Takeaway
关键要点
In summary, Keeson Technology is reinvesting funds back into the business for growth but unfortunately it looks like sales haven't increased much just yet. And in the last five years, the stock has given away 40% so the market doesn't look too hopeful on these trends strengthening any time soon. In any case, the stock doesn't have these traits of a multi-bagger discussed above, so if that's what you're looking for, we think you'd have more luck elsewhere.
总而言之,Keeson科技正在将资金重新投资于业务以实现增长,但不幸的是,销售额尚未有所增加。在过去五年中,这只股票已经贬值了40%,因此市场对这些趋势短期内不会加强并不太乐观。无论如何,这只股票并不具备上述所讨论的多倍回报的特征,因此如果您在寻找这样的机会,我们认为您可能在其他地方更有好运。
Keeson Technology does have some risks, we noticed 2 warning signs (and 1 which is potentially serious) we think you should know about.
Keeson科技确实存在一些风险,我们注意到2个预警信号(其中1个可能很严重),我们认为您应该了解这些信息。
If you want to search for solid companies with great earnings, check out this free list of companies with good balance sheets and impressive returns on equity.
如果您想寻找具有良好收益的稳健公司,可以查看这份拥有良好资产负债表和令人印象深刻的股本回报率的免费公司列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。