share_log

Insiders Are the Top Stockholders in Guangdong Brandmax Marketing Co.,Ltd. (SZSE:300805), and the Recent 13% Drop Might Have Disappointed Them

Insiders Are the Top Stockholders in Guangdong Brandmax Marketing Co.,Ltd. (SZSE:300805), and the Recent 13% Drop Might Have Disappointed Them

内部人士是电声股份(SZSE:300805)的主要股东,最近13%的下跌可能让他们感到失望。
Simply Wall St ·  01/06 17:45

Key Insights

关键洞察

  • Guangdong Brandmax MarketingLtd's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
  • The top 3 shareholders own 53% of the company
  • Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 电声股份有限公司的显著内部人持股表明公司扩张的内在利益
  • 前十大股东持有该公司53%的股份
  • 通过公司的过去业绩数据和股权研究,可以更好地评估公司的未来表现。

If you want to know who really controls Guangdong Brandmax Marketing Co.,Ltd. (SZSE:300805), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 67% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果你想知道谁真正控制了电声股份有限公司(深交所:300805),那么你必须查看其股东登记的构成。而持有最大股份的群体是拥有67%股份的个人内部人士。换句话说,这个群体面临最大上行潜力(或下行风险)。

And last week, insiders endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 13%.

而上周,内部人士因股票下跌13%而遭受最大损失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Guangdong Brandmax MarketingLtd.

在下面的图表中,我们聚焦于电声股份的不同股权结构。

big
SZSE:300805 Ownership Breakdown January 6th 2025
深交所:300805 2025年1月6日股权结构

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Guangdong Brandmax MarketingLtd?

机构股东缺失告诉我们关于电声股份的什么?

Institutional investors often avoid companies that are too small, too illiquid or too risky for their tastes. But it's unusual to see larger companies without any institutional investors.

机构投资者通常避免投资那些对他们来说太小、流动性不足或风险太大的公司。但是,看到更大公司没有任何机构投资者是不寻常的。

There are multiple explanations for why institutions don't own a stock. The most common is that the company is too small relative to funds under management, so the institution does not bother to look closely at the company. It is also possible that fund managers don't own the stock because they aren't convinced it will perform well. Guangdong Brandmax MarketingLtd might not have the sort of past performance institutions are looking for, or perhaps they simply have not studied the business closely.

机构不持有某只股票的原因有很多。最常见的原因是公司相对于所管理的基金规模太小,因此机构不愿意深入关注该公司。同时,基金经理也可能因为对股票的表现没有信心而不持有该股票。电声股份可能没有机构所期望的过去业绩,或者他们可能根本没有深入研究该业务。

big
SZSE:300805 Earnings and Revenue Growth January 6th 2025
深交所:300805 盈利和营业收入增长 2025年1月6日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Guangdong Brandmax MarketingLtd. Dingjiao Liang is currently the largest shareholder, with 32% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 13% and 7.7%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Yong Huang, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.

对冲基金在电声股份有限公司的股份并不多。 丁焦良目前是最大股东,持有32%的流通股。 与此同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有13%和7.7%的流通股。 第二大股东黄勇恰好也是首席执行官。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 3 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.

经过进一步挖掘,我们发现前3名股东共同控制超过一半的公司股份,这意味着他们在影响公司的决策方面具有相当大的权力。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

尽管研究公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪也同样重要,以了解市场的动向。据我们了解,似乎没有分析师覆盖该公司,因此它可能在雷达之下。

Insider Ownership Of Guangdong Brandmax MarketingLtd

电声股份有限公司的内部人持股情况

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

内部人的定义在不同国家之间可能会略有不同,但董事会成员始终算作内部人。公司管理层向董事会负责,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也在董事会中。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部持股是积极的,因为这表明董事会与其他股东保持良好的一致性。然而,在某些情况下,权力在这个群体中过于集中。

It seems that insiders own more than half the Guangdong Brandmax Marketing Co.,Ltd. stock. This gives them a lot of power. So they have a CN¥2.9b stake in this CN¥4.3b business. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

看起来内部人士拥有超过一半的电声股份公司的股票。这给了他们很大的权力。因此,他们在这个43亿人民币的业务中持有29亿人民币的股份。看到这种投资水平确实很好。您可以在这里查看这些内部人士最近是否有买入。

General Public Ownership

公众持股

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 31% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公众——包括零售投资者——拥有公司31%的股权,因此不能轻易被忽视。尽管这一股权规模可能不足以影响政策决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Guangdong Brandmax MarketingLtd better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should learn about the 3 warning signs we've spotted with Guangdong Brandmax MarketingLtd (including 2 which make us uncomfortable) .

始终值得考虑拥有公司股票的不同群体。但要更好地了解电声股份,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。为此,你应该了解我们发现的电声股份的3个警告信号(包括2个让我们感到不安的信号)。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.

当然,这可能不是买入的最佳股票。因此,您可能希望查看我们免费的有趣前景集合,拥有良好的财务状况。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发