Gilead Sciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:GILD) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 86%
Gilead Sciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:GILD) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 86%
Key Insights
关键见解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Gilead Sciences implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- A total of 13 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Recent sales by insiders
- 机构持有吉利德科学的大量股权意味着它们对公司的股价有重大影响
- 共有13名投资者持有该公司的多数股权,所有权为51%
- 内部人士最近的销售额
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Gilead Sciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:GILD), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 86% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解谁真正控制了吉利德科学公司(纳斯达克股票代码:GILD),了解业务的所有权结构非常重要。我们可以看到,机构拥有该公司的大部分股份,所有权为86%。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果股价下跌,则损失最大)。
Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.
鉴于他们拥有大量资金和研究能力,机构所有权往往具有很大的份量,尤其是对个人投资者而言。因此,投资于公司的大量机构资金通常被视为积极的属性。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Gilead Sciences.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们有关吉利德科学的哪些信息。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Gilead Sciences?
关于吉利德科学,机构所有权告诉我们什么?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构在向自己的投资者报告时通常会根据基准来衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会变得更加热情。我们预计大多数公司都会注册一些机构,尤其是在它们成长的情况下。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Gilead Sciences. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Gilead Sciences, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
如您所见,机构投资者持有吉利德科学的相当数量的股份。这意味着在这些机构工作的分析师已经看过这只股票,他们很喜欢。但是就像其他人一样,他们可能错了。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得查看吉利德科学过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Gilead Sciences. The company's largest shareholder is Capital Research and Management Company, with ownership of 11%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 9.8% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 9.3% by the third-largest shareholder.
由于机构投资者拥有已发行股票的一半以上,董事会可能必须注意他们的偏好。我们注意到,对冲基金没有对吉利德科学进行有意义的投资。该公司的最大股东是资本研究与管理公司,所有权为11%。就背景而言,第二大股东持有约9.8%的已发行股份,其次是第三大股东持有9.3%的所有权。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 13 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
经过进一步的挖掘,我们发现前13名股东拥有该公司的总所有权为51%,这表明没有一个单一股东对公司拥有重大控制权。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以实现同样的目标。有合理数量的分析师报道该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体看法可能会很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Gilead Sciences
吉利德科学的内部所有权
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
尽管内部人员的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理层对董事会的回答,董事会应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也在董事会中。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使得其他股东更难要求董事会对决策负责。
Our information suggests that Gilead Sciences, Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$93m worth of shares. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
我们的信息表明,吉利德科学公司的内部人士拥有该公司不到1%的股份。由于它是一家大公司,我们只期望内部人士拥有其中的一小部分。但值得注意的是,他们拥有价值9300万美元的股票。看到董事会成员拥有股票是件好事,但可能值得检查一下这些内部人士是否在买入。
General Public Ownership
普通公有制
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 14% stake in Gilead Sciences. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公众通常是个人投资者,持有吉利德科学14%的股份。尽管这个群体不一定能做主,但它肯定会对公司的运作方式产生真正的影响。
Next Steps:
后续步骤:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 5 warning signs for Gilead Sciences you should know about.
我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,考虑风险。每家公司都有它们,我们发现了你应该知道的吉利德科学的5个警告信号。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果你想了解分析师对未来增长的预测,千万不要错过这份关于分析师预测的免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后日期的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?担心内容吗?直接联系我们。或者,发送电子邮件给编辑组(网址为)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并非旨在提供财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。华尔街只是没有持有上述任何股票的头寸。