share_log

Institutional Investors Control 86% of Marvell Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ:MRVL) and Were Rewarded Last Week After Stock Increased 5.2%

Institutional Investors Control 86% of Marvell Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ:MRVL) and Were Rewarded Last Week After Stock Increased 5.2%

机构投资者控制了迈威尔科技公司(纳斯达克:MRVL)86%的股份,上周股票上涨5.2%后,他们得到了回报。
Simply Wall St ·  01/08 22:27

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Marvell Technology's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 15 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 高机构所有权意味着 Marvell Technology 的股价对其交易行为很敏感
  • 前 15 名股东拥有公司 51% 的股份
  • 内部人士最近的销售额

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Marvell Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ:MRVL), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 86% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

要了解谁真正控制了Marvell Technology, Inc.(纳斯达克股票代码:MRVL),了解业务的所有权结构非常重要。而持有最大份额的集团是拥有86%所有权的机构。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

And as as result, institutional investors reaped the most rewards after the company's stock price gained 5.2% last week. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 84%.

结果,在上周公司股价上涨5.2%之后,机构投资者获得了最大的回报。上周的涨势将进一步提振目前为84%的股东一年回报率。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Marvell Technology.

在下图中,我们放大了 Marvell Technology 的不同所有权群体。

big
NasdaqGS:MRVL Ownership Breakdown January 8th 2025
纳斯达克GS:MRVL 所有权明细 2025 年 1 月 8 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Marvell Technology?

机构所有权告诉我们关于 Marvell 技术的什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构根据接近当地市场的指数来衡量其表现。因此,他们通常会更多地关注主要指数中包含的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Marvell Technology. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Marvell Technology's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如你所见,机构投资者在Marvell科技中拥有相当数量的股份。这意味着在这些机构工作的分析师已经看过这只股票,他们很喜欢。但是就像其他人一样,他们可能错了。当多家机构拥有一只股票时,总是存在处于 “拥挤交易” 的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。对于没有增长历史的公司,这种风险更高。你可以在下面看到Marvell Technology的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事总是有更多内容。

big
NasdaqGS:MRVL Earnings and Revenue Growth January 8th 2025
纳斯达克GS:2025年1月8日MRVL收益和收入增长

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Marvell Technology is not owned by hedge funds. FMR LLC is currently the company's largest shareholder with 15% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.6% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 7.1% by the third-largest shareholder.

由于机构投资者拥有已发行股票的一半以上,董事会可能必须注意他们的偏好。Marvell Technology 不归对冲基金所有。FMR LLC目前是该公司的最大股东,已发行股份的15%。就背景而言,第二大股东持有约8.6%的已发行股份,其次是第三大股东持有7.1%的所有权。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 15 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

经过进一步的挖掘,我们发现前15名股东拥有该公司的总所有权为51%,这表明没有一个单一股东对公司拥有重大控制权。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

尽管研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解公众舆论也是有意义的。有不少分析师报道了该股,因此您可以很容易地研究预测的增长。

Insider Ownership Of Marvell Technology

Marvell Technology 的内部所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

不同国家对内部人员的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是计算在内。公司管理层经营业务,但首席执行官将向董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使得其他股东更难要求董事会对决策负责。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Marvell Technology, Inc. in their own names. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$356m worth of shares (at current prices). Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我们的数据表明,内部人士以自己的名义拥有Marvell科技公司不到1%的股份。这是一家非常大的公司,因此看到内部人士拥有该公司的很大一部分股份会令人惊讶。尽管他们的持股量不到1%,但我们可以看到董事会成员共拥有价值3.56亿美元的股票(按当前价格计算)。可以说,最近的买入和卖出同样值得考虑。你可以点击这里查看内部人士是否在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

普通公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 14% stake in Marvell Technology. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

公众通常是个人投资者,持有Marvell科技14%的股份。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Marvell Technology .

尽管值得考虑拥有公司的不同群体,但还有其他因素更为重要。为此,你应该注意我们在 Marvell Technology 中发现的 1 个警告信号。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一样,你可能需要考虑这家公司是增长还是萎缩。幸运的是,您可以查看这份免费报告,该报告显示了分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后日期的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?担心内容吗?直接联系我们。或者,发送电子邮件给编辑组(网址为)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并非旨在提供财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。华尔街只是没有持有上述任何股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发