With 81% Ownership of the Shares, Regions Financial Corporation (NYSE:RF) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners
With 81% Ownership of the Shares, Regions Financial Corporation (NYSE:RF) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners
Key Insights
关键洞察
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Regions Financial's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- The top 15 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 显著高的机构持股意味着地区金融的股票价格对他们的交易行为敏感
- 前15大股东持有公司50%的股份
- 通过分析师预测数据和所有权研究,可以更好地评估公司的未来表现。
Every investor in Regions Financial Corporation (NYSE:RF) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 81% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
地区金融公司(纽交所:RF)的每位投资者都应该意识到最强大的股东群体。 机构持有81%的股份,拥有公司的最大份额。 换句话说,该群体最有可能从对公司的投资中获利(或亏损最多)。
Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.
由于机构拥有庞大的资金和研究能力,因此机构持股往往具有重要影响力,尤其是在个人投资者中。因此,投入一家公司大量资金的机构通常被视为积极属性。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Regions Financial, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入了解地区金融的每种类型的所有者,从下面的图表开始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Regions Financial?
机构所有权告诉我们关于地区金融什么?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时,会与基准进行比较,因此一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常对该股票会更加热情。我们预期大多数公司在登记时都会有一些机构,尤其是当它们正在增长时。
Regions Financial already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Regions Financial, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
地区金融已经在股东名册上有机构。事实上,他们在公司中拥有相当可观的股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经查看了这只股票,并且他们喜欢它。但和其他任何人一样,他们也可能是错误的。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时卖出一只股票,股价大幅下跌并不罕见。因此,值得查看地区金融过去的营业收入轨迹(如下所示)。当然,记得还有其他因素需要考虑。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Regions Financial. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 12% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 9.1% of common stock, and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. holds about 6.1% of the company stock.
机构投资者拥有超过50%的公司股份,因此他们可以强有力地影响董事会决策。对地区金融的对冲基金股份不多。根据我们的数据,我们可以看到最大的股东是先锋集团,持有12%的流通股份。贝莱德是第二大股东,拥有9.1%的普通股,而道富全球顾问公司持有大约6.1%的公司股票。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 15 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
对我们的股权数据的仔细观察表明,前15大股东的合计持股比例为50%,这意味着没有单个股东拥有多数股份。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
研究机构的持股是一种很好的方式,可以评估和筛选股票的预期表现。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以实现同样的目标。相当多的分析师覆盖了这只股票,您可以很容易地查找预测增长。
Insider Ownership Of Regions Financial
地区金融的内部持股
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
内部人的定义在不同国家之间可能略有不同,但董事会成员始终被算作内部人。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,管理者成为执行董事会成员并不罕见,特别是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部持股是积极的,因为这表明董事会与其他股东保持良好的一致性。然而,在某些情况下,权力在这个群体中过于集中。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Regions Financial Corporation in their own names. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$72m worth of shares. Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我们的数据表明,内部人士在地区金融公司的个人持股占比低于1%。由于这是一家大型公司,我们仅预期内部人士持有少量股份。但值得注意的是,他们拥有价值7200万美元的股份。可以说,最近的买入和卖出同样重要。您可以点击此处查看内部人士是否有买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
公众持股
With a 18% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Regions Financial. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公众持有18%的股份,主要由个人投资者组成,对地区金融公司有一定的影响力。尽管这个持股比例可能不足以影响政策决定,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.
虽然考虑拥有公司的不同群体非常重要,但还有其他因素更为重要。
Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.
许多人发现深入分析公司过去的表现很有用。您可以访问这一详细的历史营业收入、营业收入和现金流的图表。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最终,决定这个业务的所有者表现如何的,是未来而不是过去。因此,我们认为查看这份免费的报告是明智的,报告显示分析师是否预测了一个更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。