Altria Group, Inc.'s (NYSE:MO) Institutional Investors Lost 3.1% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains
Altria Group, Inc.'s (NYSE:MO) Institutional Investors Lost 3.1% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains
Key Insights
关键洞察
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Altria Group implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- 42% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
- Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 机构在奥驰亚集团的巨额持股意味着他们对公司股价有重要影响。
- 前25名股东持有该业务的42%。
- 通过分析师预测数据和所有权研究,可以更好地评估公司的未来表现。
Every investor in Altria Group, Inc. (NYSE:MO) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 61% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
每位奥驰亚集团的投资者(纽交所:MO)都应该意识到最强大的股东群体。持有最大份额的群体是拥有61%股份的机构。这意味着,如果股票上涨,该群体将受益最多(如果出现下跌,则损失最多)。
Institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's market cap fell by US$2.8b last week. However, the 35% one-year return to shareholders might have softened the blow. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.
机构投资者在公司市值上周下降28亿美元后遭受了最大的损失。然而,给股东的35%的一年回报可能减轻了损失。我们假设他们未来会关注潜在的弱点。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Altria Group.
在下面的图表中,我们 zoom in 在奥驰亚集团不同的所有权群体。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Altria Group?
机构所有权告诉我们有关奥驰亚集团的什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与一个常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买纳入相关基准指数的大型公司股票。
We can see that Altria Group does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Altria Group's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我们可以看到奥驰亚集团确实有机构投资者,他们持有公司股票的大部分。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经看过这些股票,他们喜欢它。但就像其他任何人一样,他们也可能是错误的。如果多个机构在同一时间改变对某只股票的看法,您可能会看到股票价格迅速下跌。因此,值得查看奥驰亚集团的收益历史。当然,未来才是最重要的。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Altria Group. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 9.2% of shares outstanding. With 8.2% and 4.5% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and Capital Research and Management Company are the second and third largest shareholders.
机构投资者拥有超过50%的公司股份,因此他们共同可以强烈影响董事会的决策。对奥驰亚集团来说,对冲基金持有的股份不多。先锋集团目前是公司最大的股东,持有9.2%的流通股份。贝莱德和资本研究与管理公司分别持有8.2%和4.5%的流通股份,是第二和第三大股东。
Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.
我们的研究表明,前25大股东共同控制的公司的股份不到一半,这意味着公司的股份分散广泛,没有主导股东。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究机构的所有权是评估和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。分析师情绪的研究也可以达到同样的效果。有很多分析师在覆盖该股票,因此查看他们的预期可能也是值得的。
Insider Ownership Of Altria Group
奥驰亚集团股权内部所有权
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司内部人士的定义可能是主观的,并在不同法域之间有所不同。我们的数据显示个人内部人士,至少捕获了董事会成员。公司管理层对董事会负责,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员本身就是董事会成员。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部持股显示领导层像真正的公司所有者一样思考时,这是积极的。然而,高比例的内部持股也可能给予公司内部小团体巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Our information suggests that Altria Group, Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$63m worth of shares (at current prices). Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我们的信息表明,奥驰亚集团公司内部人士拥有不到1%的股份。 这是一家非常大的公司,因此内部人士拥有大比例股份的情况会让人感到惊讶。尽管他们的持股不到1%,但我们可以看到董事会成员共同拥有价值6300万美元的股票(按当前价格计算)。 可以说,最近的买入和卖出同样重要。您可以点击这里查看内部人士是否在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
公众持股
With a 39% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Altria Group. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
一般公众拥有39%的股份,主要由个人投资者组成,对奥驰亚集团有一定的影响力。 虽然这个群体不一定能决定公司的重大事务,但他们肯定能对公司的运行产生实际影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Altria Group has 2 warning signs (and 1 which makes us a bit uncomfortable) we think you should know about.
我发现研究究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正获得洞察,我们还需要考虑其他信息。 例如,承担风险 - 奥驰亚集团有2个警示信号(和1个让我们感到不安的信号),我们认为你应该知道。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您想了解分析师对未来增长的预测,请不要错过这份关于分析师预测的免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是根据过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,指的是截至财务报表日期的月份最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与完整年度的年报数字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容有疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇来自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,采用无偏见的方法,我们的文章并不旨在提供财务建议。它不构成对任何股票的买入或卖出建议,也未考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您提供以基本数据驱动的长期分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均没有持仓。