share_log

Biohaven's Nurtec ODT Garners Greater Early-Line Use as a Preventive Therapy Among Patients with Less Severe Migraine Compared to Eli Lilly's Emgality, According to Spherix Patient-Level Data

Biohaven's Nurtec ODT Garners Greater Early-Line Use as a Preventive Therapy Among Patients with Less Severe Migraine Compared to Eli Lilly's Emgality, According to Spherix Patient-Level Data

根据Spherix患者水平的数据,与礼来公司的Emgality相比,Bioaven的Nurtec ODT在偏头痛较轻的患者中获得了更大的早期预防性治疗。
PR Newswire ·  2021/09/23 07:32

EXTON, Pa., Sept. 23, 2021 /PRNewswire/ -- Just weeks after the FDA approval of Nurtec ODT's label expansion for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine, Eli Lilly announced initiation of a head-to-head Phase IV trial comparing their Emgality to Biohaven's gepant in patients with episodic migraine by the end of this year. With all metrics pointing to extremely strong uptake of Nurtec ODT in the prevention segment, Eli Lilly is looking to proactively defend their brand's opportunity within the market, while also adding to the body of scientific evidence supporting the role of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) in migraine.

宾夕法尼亚州埃克斯顿9月2021年2月23日/美通社/--就在FDA批准Nurtec ODT的标签扩展用于预防治疗发作性偏头痛几周后,礼来公司宣布在今年年底前启动一项面对面的IV期试验,比较他们与Bioaven公司的Gepant在发作性偏头痛患者中的有效性。由于所有指标都表明Nurtec ODT在预防领域具有极强的吸引力,礼来公司正在寻求积极捍卫其品牌在市场中的机会,同时也增加了支持降钙素基因相关肽(CGRP)在偏头痛中的作用的科学证据。

In the third annual audit included in Spherix's RealWorld Dynamix™: Preventive Treatment in Migraine (US) service, 221 neurologists and migraine specialists provided data on 1,013 patients. The patients included in the study were prescribed Nurtec ODT, Emgality, Amgen's Aimovig, Teva's Ajovy, Lundbeck's Vyepti, or AbbVie's (formerly Allergan, an AbbVie company) Botox for the preventive treatment of migraine no more than three months prior to the July 2021 fielding.

在Spherix的第三次年度审计中Realworld Dynamix™:偏头痛的预防性治疗(美国)在这项服务中,221名神经科医生和偏头痛专家提供了1013名患者的数据。参加研究的患者在2021年7月就诊前不超过3个月,服用Nurtec ODT、Emgality、Amgen‘s Aimovig、Teva’s Ajovy、Lundbeck‘s Vyepti或AbbVie’s(前Allergan,AbbVie公司)肉毒杆菌预防治疗偏头痛。

According to the chart audit data, Nurtec ODT-treated patients were almost twice as likely to be diagnosed with low frequency episodic migraine – in line with the gepant's approved prevention indication for episodic migraine. In comparison, close to one-third of patients recently prescribed Emgality were diagnosed with chronic migraine.

根据图表审计数据,接受Nurtec ODT治疗的患者被诊断为低频率发作性偏头痛的可能性几乎是前者的两倍,这与Gepant批准的预防发作性偏头痛的适应症是一致的。相比之下,最近服用Emgality的患者中有近三分之一被诊断为慢性偏头痛。

Consistent with this pattern, Emgality-treated patients were more likely to have typically severe migraine attacks and to have a 21+ score on the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire, reflecting severe or very severe migraine-related disability at the time of the brand selection. Indeed, almost two out of five patients were considered occupationally disabled due to migraine when prescribed Emgality.

与这一模式一致,接受Emgality治疗的患者更有可能出现典型的严重偏头痛发作,并在偏头痛残疾评估(MIDAS)问卷上获得21+分,这反映了在选择品牌时与偏头痛相关的严重或非常严重的残疾。事实上,当开出Emgality处方时,几乎五分之二的患者被认为是由于偏头痛而导致的职业性残疾。

The decision to make a change to the patient's preventive therapy regimen, whether by initiating preventive treatment for the first time or by prescribing a new option, was driven by efficacy needs in the majority of audited cases. The leading efficacy-related factor was prolonged or increased duration of migraine attacks when prescribed Emgality and persistently high or worsening migraine severity when prescribed Nurtec ODT. Reasons other than efficacy that were relevant for regimen changes toward Emgality included patient request, tolerability, and sample availability. 

改变患者的预防治疗方案的决定,无论是通过第一次开始预防性治疗还是通过开出新的选择,都是由大多数审计病例的疗效需求推动的。首屈一指的疗效相关因素是在处方中使用Emgality时偏头痛发作的持续时间延长或延长,而在使用Nurtec ODT时偏头痛的严重程度持续较高或恶化。除了疗效以外,与EMEGALITY方案改变相关的其他原因包括患者要求、耐受性和样本可获得性。

Likely benefiting from broad use as an acute therapy, Nurtec ODT is currently being prescribed as an earlier-line preventive therapy compared to Emgality. The majority of patients prescribed Nurtec ODT had failed at most one prior therapy, whereas more than half of patients were prescribed Emgality after two or more prior preventive therapy failures. Among those who discontinued a therapy, topiramate and/or an antidepressant were the most likely prior therapies for both brands.

与Emgality相比,Nurtec ODT可能受益于作为一种急性疗法的广泛使用,目前正作为一种更早的预防性疗法被开出处方。大多数患者服用Nurtec ODT之前最多只有一次治疗失败,而超过一半的患者在之前两次或两次以上的预防性治疗失败后开了Emgality。在那些停止治疗的人中,托吡酯和/或抗抑郁药是这两个品牌最有可能的先前治疗。

While contributing physicians were substantially more likely to agree that the responder rates of the CGRP monoclonal antibodies (i.e., Emgality) versus that of Nurtec ODT are superior to topiramate or Botox, efficacy expectations were key to decisions to prescribe the gepant.

虽然有贡献的医生更有可能同意CGRP单克隆抗体(即Emgality)相对于Nurtec ODT的应答率优于托吡酯或肉毒杆菌,但疗效预期是决定开Gepant的关键。

Nurtec ODT was most commonly prescribed due to a desire for sustained efficacy, speed of efficacy onset, and ≥50% responder rate. Although Nurtec ODT represents the first oral CGRP antagonist, attributes related to its dosing profile did not break the top five most common reasons for prescribing. In comparison, favorable tolerability profile and preferred autoinjector were among the most common reasons for deciding to prescribe Emgality.

最常用的处方是Nurtec ODT,因为希望获得持久的疗效、起效速度和≥50%的应答率。尽管Nurtec ODT代表了第一种口服降钙素基因相关肽拮抗剂,但与其剂量分布相关的属性并没有打破最常见的5个处方原因。相比之下,良好的耐受性和首选的自动注射器是决定使用Emgality的最常见原因。

Suggesting strong competitive pressure within the prevention segment, Emgality lost more than half of the brand's possible new prescription opportunities to other brands. In comparison, Nurtec ODT tends to emerge successful when up against a likely alternative option during the therapy selection process. When competing directly with Emgality, preferred dosing formulation and better convenience were central to Nurtec ODT winning the new prescription opportunity.

这表明预防领域存在强大的竞争压力,Emgality将该品牌可能的新处方药机会的一半以上拱手让给了其他品牌。相比之下,当在治疗选择过程中遇到可能的替代选择时,Nurtec ODT往往会成功。当与Emgality直接竞争时,首选的剂量配方和更好的便利性是Nurtec ODT赢得新处方机会的关键。

However, in the end, it is Aimovig and Botox (and not Emgality) that appear to be Nurtec ODT's toughest competitors, with monthly migraine day reduction expectations and patient requests driving those brands' respective wins over the new kid on the block. With Nurtec ODT approved for episodic migraine and Botox for chronic migraine, it's expected that AbbVie's focus is on atogepant – the potentially second-to-segment gepant assuming a positive PDUFA later this month for the preventive treatment of migraine.

然而,归根结底,似乎是Aimovig和Botox(而不是Emgality)是Nurtec ODT最难对付的竞争对手,每月偏头痛天数的减少预期和耐心的要求推动着这两个品牌分别赢得了新上市的孩子的青睐。随着Nurtec ODT被批准用于发作性偏头痛,肉毒杆菌毒素被批准用于慢性偏头痛,预计AbbVie的重点将放在非感受剂上-这种潜在的次要节段的止痛药假设PDUFA在本月晚些时候呈阳性,用于偏头痛的预防性治疗。

While Aimovig and Emgality antagonize CGRP through different mechanisms, positive outcomes from Eli Lilly's planned head-to-head trial demonstrating efficacy superiority to Nurtec ODT could help Amgen buffer future competition from Nurtec ODT and atogepant.

虽然Aimovig和Emgality通过不同的机制对抗CGRP,但礼来公司计划中的面对面试验的积极结果表明疗效优于Nurtec ODT,这可能有助于安进缓冲来自Nurtec ODT和无感受者的未来竞争。

About RealWorld Dynamix™
RealWorld Dynamix™ is an independent, data-driven service unveiling real patient management patterns through rigorous analysis of large-scale patient chart audits. Insights reveal the "why" behind treatment decisions, include year over year trending to quantify key aspects of market evolution, and integrate specialists' attitudinal & demographic data to highlight differences between stated and actual treatment patterns.

关于RealWorld Dynamix™
RealWorld Dynamix™是一项独立的、数据驱动的服务,通过对大规模病历审计的严格分析来揭示真实的患者管理模式。洞察力揭示了治疗决策背后的“原因”,包括量化市场演变的关键方面的逐年趋势,以及整合专家的态度和人口统计数据,以突出陈述的治疗模式和实际治疗模式之间的差异。

The 2021 audit is the third annual edition included in the RealWorld Dynamix™: Preventive Treatment in Migraine (US) service. Learn more about our services here.

2021年的审计是包括在2021年审计中的第三个年度版本Realworld Dynamix™:偏头痛的预防性治疗(美国)服务。单击此处了解有关我们服务的更多信息。

About Spherix Global Insights
Spherix Global Insights is a hyper-focused market intelligence firm that leverages our own independent data and expertise to provide strategic guidance, so biopharma stakeholders make decisions with confidence. We specialize in select dermatology, gastroenterology, nephrology, neurology, and rheumatology markets.

关于Spherix Global Insight
Spherix Global Insights是一家高度专注的市场情报公司,利用我们自己的独立数据和专业知识提供战略指导,让生物制药利益相关者充满信心地做出决策。我们专门从事皮肤科、肠胃科、肾脏科、神经科和风湿科的精选市场。

All company, brand or product names in this document are trademarks of their respective holders.

本文档中的所有公司、品牌或产品名称均为其各自所有者的商标。

For more information contact:
Kristen Henn, Business Development Manager
Email: [email protected]
www.spherixglobalinsights.com

如需更多信息,请联系:业务发展经理克里斯汀·亨恩(Kristen Henn)电子邮件:[受电子邮件保护]Www.spherixglobalinsights.com

SOURCE Spherix Global Insights

Source Spherix Global Insight

Related Links

相关链接

http://www.spherixglobalinsights.com

Http://www.spherixglobalinsights.com

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发