Here's What Dingdong (Cayman) Limited's (NYSE:DDL) Shareholder Ownership Structure Looks Like
Here's What Dingdong (Cayman) Limited's (NYSE:DDL) Shareholder Ownership Structure Looks Like
If you want to know who really controls Dingdong (Cayman) Limited (NYSE:DDL), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. Institutions will often hold stock in bigger companies, and we expect to see insiders owning a noticeable percentage of the smaller ones. I generally like to see some degree of insider ownership, even if only a little. As Nassim Nicholas Taleb said, 'Don't tell me what you think, tell me what you have in your portfolio.
如果你想知道誰真正控制着叮咚買菜(開曼羣島)有限公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:DDL),那麼你就必須看看它的股票登記簿的構成。機構通常會持有較大公司的股票,我們預計內部人士將持有較小公司相當比例的股份。我通常喜歡看到一定程度的內部人持股,即使只是一小部分。正如納西姆·尼古拉斯·塔勒布所説,不要告訴我你的想法,告訴我你的投資組合中有什麼。
Dingdong (Cayman) isn't enormous, but it's not particularly small either. It has a market capitalization of US$863m, which means it would generally expect to see some institutions on the share registry. In the chart below, we can see that institutional investors have not yet purchased much of the company. We can zoom in on the different ownership groups, to learn more about Dingdong (Cayman).
叮咚買菜(開曼羣島)不是很大,但也不是特別小。它的市值為8.63億美元,這意味着它通常會預計會有一些機構出現在股票登記簿上。在下面的圖表中,我們可以看到,機構投資者尚未購買該公司的大量股份。我們可以放大不同的所有權組,瞭解有關叮咚買菜(開曼羣島)的更多信息。
View our latest analysis for Dingdong (Cayman)
查看我們對叮咚買菜(開曼羣島)的最新分析
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Dingdong (Cayman)?
關於叮咚買菜(開曼羣島),機構持股告訴了我們什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構以一個接近當地市場的指數來衡量它們的表現。因此,他們通常更關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。
Less than 5% of Dingdong (Cayman) is held by institutional investors. This suggests that some funds have the company in their sights, but many have not yet bought shares in it. So if the company itself can improve over time, we may well see more institutional buyers in the future. It is not uncommon to see a big share price rise if multiple institutional investors are trying to buy into a stock at the same time. So check out the historic earnings trajectory, below, but keep in mind it's the future that counts most.
機構投資者持有叮咚買菜(開曼羣島)不到5%的股份。這表明,一些基金瞄準了該公司,但許多基金尚未購買該公司的股票。因此,如果公司本身能夠隨着時間的推移而改善,我們很可能會在未來看到更多的機構買家。如果多個機構投資者試圖同時買入一隻股票,股價大幅上漲的情況並不少見。所以,看看下面的歷史收益軌跡,但要記住,未來才是最重要的。
Our data indicates that hedge funds own 6.6% of Dingdong (Cayman). That catches my attention because hedge funds sometimes try to influence management, or bring about changes that will create near term value for shareholders. The company's CEO Liang Changlin is the largest shareholder with 33% of shares outstanding. Capital Today is the second largest shareholder owning 11% of common stock, and Tiger Global Management, LLC holds about 6.6% of the company stock.
我們的數據顯示,對衝基金持有叮咚買菜(開曼羣島)6.6%的股份。這引起了我的注意,因為對衝基金有時會試圖影響管理層,或者帶來為股東創造短期價值的變化。該公司首席執行官樑長林是第一大股東,持有33%的流通股。Capital Today是第二大股東,持有11%的普通股,老虎環球管理公司持有公司約6.6%的股份。
A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 3 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 50% stake.
對股東登記的更詳細的研究表明,三大股東通過他們50%的股份在公司中擁有相當大的所有權。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究機構持股是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以達到同樣的效果。有很多分析師在追蹤這隻股票,所以他們的預測可能也是值得的。
Insider Ownership Of Dingdong (Cayman)
叮咚買菜(開曼羣島)的內部人士所有權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
不同國家對內部人的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是算數的。公司管理層管理企業,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認為內部人持股是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這會讓其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Dingdong (Cayman) Limited. Insiders own US$284m worth of shares in the US$863m company. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的最新數據顯示,內部人士持有叮咚買菜(開曼)有限公司相當比例的股份。內部人士持有這家市值8.63億美元的公司價值2.84億美元的股票。我們會説,這表明了與股東的一致,但值得注意的是,該公司仍相當小;一些內部人士可能創建了這家企業。你可以點擊這裏,看看這些內部人士是一直在買入還是賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
With a 16% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Dingdong (Cayman). This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
持有16%股權的普通公眾,主要由個人投資者組成,對叮咚買菜(開曼羣島)有一定程度的影響力。這種規模的所有權雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Private Equity Ownership
私募股權所有權
With a stake of 39%, private equity firms could influence the Dingdong (Cayman) board. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.
私募股權公司持有39%的股份,可以影響叮咚買菜(開曼羣島)董事會。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因為私人股本有時能夠鼓勵有助於市場看到公司價值的策略。或者,這些持有者可能會在投資上市後退出。
Next Steps:
接下來的步驟:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Dingdong (Cayman) better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Dingdong (Cayman) you should be aware of.
擁有一家公司股票的不同集團總是值得考慮的。但要更好地理解叮咚買菜(開曼羣島),我們需要考慮許多其他因素。舉個例子:我們發現了兩個叮咚買菜(開曼羣島)的警告標誌,你應該注意。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終未來是最重要的。您可以訪問此免費分析師對該公司的預測報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數字是使用過去12個月的數據計算的,指的是截至財務報表日期的最後一個月的12個月期間。這可能與全年的年度報告數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫。或者,也可以給編輯組發電子郵件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰寫,具有概括性。我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議。它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況。我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。Simply Wall St.對上述任何一隻股票都沒有持倉。