share_log

Is Asia Cement (China) Holdings Corporation (HKG:743) Popular Amongst Institutions?

Is Asia Cement (China) Holdings Corporation (HKG:743) Popular Amongst Institutions?

亞洲水泥(中國)控股公司(HKG: 743)在機構中受歡迎嗎?
Simply Wall St ·  2022/06/30 19:10

The big shareholder groups in Asia Cement (China) Holdings Corporation (HKG:743) have power over the company. Large companies usually have institutions as shareholders, and we usually see insiders owning shares in smaller companies. We also tend to see lower insider ownership in companies that were previously publicly owned.

亞洲水泥(中國)控股有限公司(HKG:743)的大股東群體對該公司有一定的掌控力。通常情況下,大型企業都有機構作爲股東,而在小型企業中,我們通常會看到內部人持有股份。此外,在之前公開招股的公司中,內部人持股較低。

Asia Cement (China) Holdings isn't enormous, but it's not particularly small either. It has a market capitalization of HK$6.7b, which means it would generally expect to see some institutions on the share registry. Our analysis of the ownership of the company, below, shows that institutions own shares in the company. We can zoom in on the different ownership groups, to learn more about Asia Cement (China) Holdings.

亞洲水泥(中國)控股的市值不算太大,但也不是很小。它的市值爲67億港幣,這意味着它通常會有一些機構在股東名冊上。我們對該公司所有權的分析如下所示,機構擁有該公司的股份。我們可以放大不同的所有權群體,以了解更多關於亞洲水泥(中國)控股的信息。

View our latest analysis for Asia Cement (China) Holdings

查看我們對亞洲水泥(中國)控股的最新分析。

SEHK:743 Ownership Breakdown June 30th 2022
SEHK:743所有權結構於2022年6月30日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Asia Cement (China) Holdings?

機構擁有的亞洲水泥(中國)控股的股權信息告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

We can see that Asia Cement (China) Holdings does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Asia Cement (China) Holdings' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到,亞洲水泥(中國)控股確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司的一部分股票。這表明在專業投資者中具有一定的信譽。但我們不能單單依靠這一點,因爲機構有時也會做出不好的投資,就像其他人一樣。如果多個機構在同一時間改變他們對一隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得注意的是亞洲水泥(中國)控股以下的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

SEHK:743 Earnings and Revenue Growth June 30th 2022
SEHK:743盈利和營業收入增長於2022年6月30日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Asia Cement (China) Holdings. The company's largest shareholder is Asia Cement Corporation, with ownership of 72%. This implies that they have majority interest control of the future of the company. Invesco Ltd. is the second largest shareholder owning 2.8% of common stock, and Franklin Resources, Inc. holds about 1.6% of the company stock.

對於亞洲水泥(中國)控股,對沖基金並沒有持有太多股份。最大股東是亞洲水泥公司,持有該公司股份的72%。這意味着他們在該公司未來的控制利益方面具有大多數利益。英富時公司是持有該公司普通股2.8%的第二大股東,而富蘭克林資源公司持有該公司股票的約1.6%。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.

雖然研究一家公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒也是有意義的,以了解風向正在往哪裏吹。雖然有一些分析師對該股票進行了覆蓋,但隨着時間的推移,它可能仍然會變得更加知名。

Insider Ownership Of Asia Cement (China) Holdings

亞洲水泥(中國)控股的內部人持股情況

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,在管轄範圍之間會有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理擔任執行董事會成員並非不尋常,特別是如果他們是創始人或CEO。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Asia Cement (China) Holdings Corporation. But they may have an indirect interest through a corporate structure that we haven't picked up on. It seems the board members have no more than HK$21m worth of shares in the HK$6.7b company. We generally like to see a board more invested. However it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們最近的數據顯示內部人持有亞洲水泥(中國)控股有限公司的股份不到1%。但他們可能通過我們沒有發現的公司結構間接擁有利益。董事會成員在這家市值67億港幣的公司中持有不到2100萬港幣的股份。我們通常希望看到董事會更有投資,但也可能值得檢查一下這些內部人是否一直在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 18% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Asia Cement (China) Holdings. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

擁有18%的股份,以個人投資者爲主的普通大衆在亞洲水泥(中國)控股方面具有一定的影響力。雖然持股規模相當可觀,但如果決策不與其他大股東保持一致,這可能不足以改變公司政策。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

It appears to us that public companies own 72% of Asia Cement (China) Holdings. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.

我們認爲,公共企業擁有亞洲水泥(中國)控股有限公司的72%。雖然很難確定,但這表明他們擁有交織的業務利益。這可能是其中一個戰略股份,因此值得關注這個領域的所有權變化。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Asia Cement (China) Holdings you should be aware of.

雖然考慮到擁有公司的不同群體很值得,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如:我們發現亞洲水泥(中國)控股有2個警告信號,你應該知道。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論