Individual Investors Are HNA Technology Co.,Ltd.'s (SHSE:600751) Biggest Owners and Were Rewarded After Market Cap Rose by CN¥696m Last Week
Individual Investors Are HNA Technology Co.,Ltd.'s (SHSE:600751) Biggest Owners and Were Rewarded After Market Cap Rose by CN¥696m Last Week
To get a sense of who is truly in control of HNA Technology Co.,Ltd. (SHSE:600751), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 55% stake, individual investors possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
了解誰是真正掌控海航科技股份有限公司,股份有限公司(SHSE股份有限公司:600751),了解業務的所有權結構非常重要。擁有 55% 的股份,個人投資者擁有該公司的最大股份。換句話說,該集團從對公司的投資中獲得最大(或損失最多)。
Clearly, individual investors benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by CN¥696m last week.
顯然,在公司上週市值上漲 6600 萬人民幣後,個人投資者受益最大。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of HNA TechnologyLtd.
在下圖中,我們放大了海航科技有限公司的不同股權組別。
View our latest analysis for HNA TechnologyLtd
查看我們對海航科技有限公司的最新分析
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About HNA TechnologyLtd?
機構擁有權告訴我們關於海航科技有限公司的什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常會將自己的回報與常用指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包含在相關基準指數中的大型公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in HNA TechnologyLtd. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see HNA TechnologyLtd's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
如您所見,機構投資者在海航科技有限公司擁有相當數量的股份。這可以表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好警惕依靠機構投資者所提供的驗證。他們也是,有時會弄錯。當多個機構擁有一個股票時,他們總有處於「擁擠交易」的風險。當這種交易出錯時,多方可能會競爭快速出售股票。在沒有增長歷史的公司中,這種風險較高。您可以在下面看到海航科技有限公司的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,總是有更多的故事。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in HNA TechnologyLtd. The company's largest shareholder is Hainan Traffic Administration Holding Co., Ltd., with ownership of 29%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 14% and 0.7% of the stock.
對沖基金在海航科技有限公司沒有很多股份。公司最大股東為海南交通管理控股股份有限公司,擁有 29%。相比之下,第二大和第三大股東持有約 14% 和 0.7% 的股票。
On studying our ownership data, we found that 11 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.
在研究我們的所有權數據時,我們發現 11 名頂級股東共擁有少於 50% 的股份登記冊,這意味著沒有任何一個人擁有多數權益。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.
儘管研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向吹來也是有意義的。我們目前沒有拿起該股票的任何分析師報導,因此該公司不太可能被廣泛持有。
Insider Ownership Of HNA TechnologyLtd
海航科技有限公司的內幕擁有權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
內部人士的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計數。公司管理層對董事會的答案,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時頂級管理者是在董事會自己。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認為內幕所有權是積極的,因為它可以表明董事會與其他股東保持一致。但是,在某些情況下,這個組中集中了太多的權力。
Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. It is unusual not to have at least some personal holdings by board members, so our data might be flawed. A good next step would be to check how much the CEO is paid.
我們的數據無法確認董事會成員是否親自持有股份。董事會成員至少沒有一些個人持有股份是不尋常的,因此我們的數據可能存在缺陷。一個很好的下一步是檢查 CEO 的薪水。
General Public Ownership
一般公共所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a substantial 55% stake in HNA TechnologyLtd, suggesting it is a fairly popular stock. This size of ownership gives investors from the general public some collective power. They can and probably do influence decisions on executive compensation, dividend policies and proposed business acquisitions.
普通大眾(通常是個人投資者)持有海航科技有限公司 55% 的大量股份,這表明它是一種相當受歡迎的股票。這種擁有權的規模為一般大眾提供了一些集體權力的投資者。他們可以而且可能會影響行政人員薪酬,股息政策和擬議商業收購的決定。
Private Company Ownership
私人公司所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 29%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
我們可以看到,私人公司擁有已發行股份的 29%。可能值得更深入地研究這一點。如果相關人士(例如內部人士)對上述其中一間私人公司有權益,則應在年報中披露。私人公司也可能對公司有戰略利益。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should learn about the 2 warning signs we've spotted with HNA TechnologyLtd (including 1 which is significant) .
雖然值得考慮擁有一家公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更加重要。為此,您應該了解 2 警告標誌 我們已經發現了海航科技有限公司(包括重要的 1 個)。
Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.
當然, 通過尋找其他地方,您可能會發現出色的投資。 因此,請先看看這個 自由 有趣的公司名單。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去 12 個月的數據計算的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一個日期的 12 個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?關注內容? 取得聯繫 直接與我們聯繫。 或者,通過電子郵件發送電子郵件給編輯團隊。
這篇文章由簡單牆聖是一般性質. 我們僅使用公正的方法,根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議。 它並不構成購買或出售任何股票的建議,也不會考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是為您帶來由基本數據驅動的長期集中分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。簡易華街在提及的任何股票中都沒有倉位。