share_log

Homeland Interactive Technology Ltd.'s (HKG:3798) Largest Shareholder, CEO Chengze Wu Sees Holdings Value Fall by 18% Following Recent Drop

Homeland Interactive Technology Ltd.'s (HKG:3798) Largest Shareholder, CEO Chengze Wu Sees Holdings Value Fall by 18% Following Recent Drop

家園互動科技有限公司 's (HKG: 3798) 最大股東、首席執行官吳承澤視近期下跌後控股價值下跌 18%
Simply Wall St ·  2023/04/04 18:32

Key Insights

關鍵洞察

  • Homeland Interactive Technology's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
  • A total of 3 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
  • Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 國土互動科技的重要內幕所有權表明公司擴張的固有利益
  • 共有 3 名投資者擁有該公司的大部分股份,擁有 52% 所有權
  • 使用來自公司過去業績的數據以及所有權研究,可以更好地評估公司的未來績效

If you want to know who really controls Homeland Interactive Technology Ltd. (HKG:3798), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 60% to be precise, is individual insiders. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道誰真正控制國土互動科技有限公司(HKG:3798),那麼你就必須看看它的股份註冊表的組成。本集團持有公司股份數量最多,準確 60% 左右,是個人內部人士。換句話說,該集團從對公司的投資中獲得最大(或損失最多)。

And following last week's 18% decline in share price, insiders suffered the most losses.

在上週 18% 的股價下跌之後,內部人士遭受了最大的損失。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Homeland Interactive Technology, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入研究國土互動技術的每種類型的所有者,從下面的圖表開始。

View our latest analysis for Homeland Interactive Technology

查看我們對國土互動技術的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
SEHK:3798 Ownership Breakdown April 4th 2023
香港聯交所代碼:3798 年 4 月 4 日擁有權分類

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Homeland Interactive Technology?

缺乏機構所有權告訴我們關於國土互動技術的信息是什麼?

We don't tend to see institutional investors holding stock of companies that are very risky, thinly traded, or very small. Though we do sometimes see large companies without institutions on the register, it's not particularly common.

我們不傾向於看到機構投資者持有風險非常高,交易稀薄或非常小的公司股票。雖然我們確實有時會看到沒有機構的大公司註冊,但這並不是特別常見。

There are many reasons why a company might not have any institutions on the share registry. It may be hard for institutions to buy large amounts of shares, if liquidity (the amount of shares traded each day) is low. If the company has not needed to raise capital, institutions might lack the opportunity to build a position. It is also possible that fund managers don't own the stock because they aren't convinced it will perform well. Institutional investors may not find the historic growth of the business impressive, or there might be other factors at play. You can see the past revenue performance of Homeland Interactive Technology, for yourself, below.

公司在股份登記處可能沒有任何機構的原因有很多。如果流動性(每天交易的股票數量)較低,機構可能很難購買大量股票。如果公司不需要籌集資金,那麼機構可能缺乏建立職位的機會。基金經理也可能不擁有該股票,因為他們不相信它會表現良好。機構投資者可能不會發現業務的歷史增長令人印象深刻,或者可能還有其他因素在起作用。您可以在下面查看國土互動科技的過去收入表現。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SEHK:3798 Earnings and Revenue Growth April 4th 2023
聯交所代碼:3798 二零二三年四月四日收益及收入增長

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Homeland Interactive Technology. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Chengze Wu with 34% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 9.4% and 8.7%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Note that two of the top three shareholders are also Chief Investment Officer and Member of the Board of Directors, respectively, once again pointing to significant ownership by company insiders.

我們注意到,對沖基金對國土互動技術沒有有意義的投資。查看我們的數據,我們可以看到,最大的股東是首席執行官吳承澤,擁有 34% 的已發行股份。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有 9.4% 和 8.7% 的已發行股份。請注意,前三名股東中有兩名分別是首席投資官和董事會成員,再次指出公司內部人員的重要所有權。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 3 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 52% stake.

對股東登記處進行了更詳細的研究表明,3 名頂級股東通過其 52% 的股份在公司擁有相當大的所有權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

儘管研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向吹來也是有意義的。雖然有一些分析師覆蓋,但該公司可能沒有被廣泛覆蓋。因此它可以在賽道上獲得更多關注。

Insider Ownership Of Homeland Interactive Technology

國土互動技術的內幕所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

內部人士的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計數。公司管理層對董事會的答案,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時頂級管理者是在董事會自己。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認為內幕所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,其他股東更難以讓董事會對決策負責。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own the majority of Homeland Interactive Technology Ltd.. This means they can collectively make decisions for the company. So they have a HK$1.2b stake in this HK$2.0b business. Most would argue this is a positive, showing strong alignment with shareholders. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們最近的數據表明,內部人士擁有國土互動技術有限公司的大多數。這意味著他們可以共同為公司做出決定。因此,他們在這項 2.0 億港元的業務中擁有 1.2 億港元的股份。大多數人會認為這是一個積極的,表現出與股東的強烈一致性。您可以單擊此處查看那些內部人士是否已經購買或出售。

General Public Ownership

一般公共所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 34% stake in Homeland Interactive Technology. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通大眾通常是個人投資者,持有國土互動技術 34% 的股份。雖然這種規模的擁有權可能不足以影響他們的政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權擁有權

Private equity firms hold a 5.7% stake in Homeland Interactive Technology. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

私募股權公司持有國土互動科技 5.7% 的股份。這表明他們可以在關鍵政策決策中具有影響力。有時候,我們看到私募股權投資從長遠來看,但一般來說,它們的投資期限較短,顧名思義--不要對上市公司投資太多。一段時間後,他們可能會尋求在其他地方出售和重新部署資本。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Homeland Interactive Technology .

我覺得看看誰確切擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是要真正獲得洞察力,我們也需要考慮其他信息。為此,您應該意識到 2 警告標誌 我們已經發現了國土互動技術。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終 它, 是, 未來,而不是過去,這將決定如何好這個業務的業主將做。因此,我們認為最好看看這份免費報告,顯示分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去 12 個月的數據計算的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一個日期的 12 個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?關注內容? 取得聯繫 直接與我們聯繫。 或者,通過電子郵件發送電子郵件給編輯團隊。
這篇文章由簡單牆聖是一般性質. 我們僅使用公正的方法,根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議。 它並不構成購買或出售任何股票的建議,也不會考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是為您帶來由基本數據驅動的長期集中分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。簡易華街在提及的任何股票中都沒有倉位。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論