C3.ai, Inc. (NYSE:AI) Most Popular Amongst Retail Investors Who Own 50% of the Shares, Institutions Hold 31%
C3.ai, Inc. (NYSE:AI) Most Popular Amongst Retail Investors Who Own 50% of the Shares, Institutions Hold 31%
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Significant control over C3.ai by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- 43% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
- 12% of C3.ai is held by insiders
- 散戶投資者對 C3.ai 的嚴格控制意味着公衆更有權影響管理和治理相關決策
- 43% 的業務由前 25 名股東持有
- C3.ai 的12%由內部人士持有
Every investor in C3.ai, Inc. (NYSE:AI) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 50% to be precise, is retail investors. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
C3.ai, Inc.(紐約證券交易所代碼:AI)的每位投資者都應該瞭解最強大的股東羣體。持有公司股份最多的集團是散戶投資者,準確地說約爲50%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
Meanwhile, institutions make up 31% of the company's shareholders. Institutions often own shares in more established companies, while it's not unusual to see insiders own a fair bit of smaller companies.
同時,機構佔公司股東的31%。機構通常擁有更成熟公司的股份,而內部人士擁有相當多的小型公司的情況並不少見。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about C3.ai.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於 C3.ai 的甚麼。
Check out our latest analysis for C3.ai
看看我們對 C3.ai 的最新分析
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About C3.ai?
關於 C3.ai,機構所有權告訴我們甚麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。
C3.ai already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of C3.ai, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
C3.ai 在股票註冊表上已經有機構了。事實上,他們在公司擁有可觀的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的可信度。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像每個人一樣進行不良投資。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時賣出一隻股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得一看看 C3.ai 過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。
C3.ai is not owned by hedge funds. With a 8.4% stake, CEO Thomas Siebel is the largest shareholder. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 8.1% and 7.7% of the stock.
C3.ai 不歸對沖基金所有。首席執行官托馬斯·西貝爾持有8.4%的股份,是最大的股東。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約8.1%和7.7%的股票。
A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.
深入研究我們的所有權數據表明,前25名股東總共持有不到登記冊的一半,這表明一大批小股東沒有單一股東佔多數。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地瞭解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。
Insider Ownership Of C3.ai
C3.ai 的內部所有權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終算在內。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in C3.ai, Inc.. Insiders own US$290m worth of shares in the US$2.5b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的信息表明,內部人士持有 C3.ai, Inc. 的大量股份。內部人士擁有這家價值25億美元的公司價值2.9億美元的股份。這很有意義。大多數人會說,這表明了與股東的良好一致性,尤其是在如此規模的公司中。您可以點擊此處查看這些內部人士是在買入還是賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
With a 50% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over C3.ai. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公衆擁有50%的所有權,主要由個人投資者組成,對 C3.ai 有一定程度的影響力。雖然這個團體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運營方式產生真正的影響。
Private Company Ownership
私人公司所有權
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 7.7%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我們的數據表明,私人公司持有該公司7.7%的股份。僅憑這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得研究誰擁有這些私營公司。有時,內部人士或其他關聯方通過獨立的私人公司持有上市公司的股份權益。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for C3.ai (1 is a bit concerning) that you should be aware of.
我覺得看看究竟是誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們也需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們已經確定了 C3.ai 的 3 個警告標誌 (1 有點令人擔憂),你應該注意。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果你想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,千萬不要錯過這篇文章 免費的 分析師預測報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂? 取得聯繫 直接和我們聯繫。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是一般性的。 我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。 它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未將最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。簡而言之,華爾街對上述任何股票都沒有頭寸。