Individual Investors Who Own 44% Along With Institutions Invested in C3.ai, Inc. (NYSE:AI) Saw Increase in Their Holdings Value Last Week
Individual Investors Who Own 44% Along With Institutions Invested in C3.ai, Inc. (NYSE:AI) Saw Increase in Their Holdings Value Last Week
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- C3.ai's significant individual investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- The top 25 shareholders own 45% of the company
- 12% of C3.ai is held by insiders
- C3.ai 擁有大量的個人投資者所有權,這表明關鍵決策受到廣大公衆股東的影響
- 前25名股東擁有公司45%的股份
- C3.ai 的12%由內部人士持有
To get a sense of who is truly in control of C3.ai, Inc. (NYSE:AI), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that individual investors own the lion's share in the company with 44% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解誰真正控制了 C3.ai, Inc.(紐約證券交易所代碼:AI),了解企業的所有權結構很重要。我們可以看到,個人投資者擁有公司的大部分股份,所有權爲44%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。
While individual investors were the group that reaped the most benefits after last week's 4.5% price gain, institutions also received a 39% cut.
儘管個人投資者是繼上週股價上漲4.5%之後獲得最大收益的羣體,但機構也獲得了39%的削減。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of C3.ai.
在下圖中,我們放大了 C3.ai 的不同所有權組。
View our latest analysis for C3.ai
查看我們對 C3.ai 的最新分析
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About C3.ai?
關於 C3.ai,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。
We can see that C3.ai does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at C3.ai's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我們可以看出 C3.ai 確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司的很大一部分股票。這可以表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者提供的假定驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。如果多家機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看 C3.ai 的收益歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in C3.ai. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Thomas Siebel with 8.2% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.9% and 6.0%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
我們注意到,對沖基金對 C3.ai 沒有有意義的投資。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大的股東是首席執行官托馬斯·西貝爾(Thomas Siebel),已發行股份佔8.2%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的7.9%和6.0%。
Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.
我們的研究表明,前25名股東共同控制的公司股份不到一半,這意味着該公司的股票分佈廣泛,沒有占主導地位的股東。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。
Insider Ownership Of C3.ai
C3.ai 的內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該羣體中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of C3.ai, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$4.6b, and insiders have US$535m worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.
我們的最新數據表明,內部人士擁有合理比例的 C3.ai, Inc.它的市值僅爲46億美元,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值5.35億美元的股票。這非常重要。大多數人會很高興看到董事會與他們一起投資。您不妨訪問這張顯示內部人士近期交易的免費圖表。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
With a 44% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over C3.ai. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
普通公衆(主要由個人投資者組成)擁有 44% 的所有權,對 C3.ai 有一定程度的影響力。雖然這個羣體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。
Private Company Ownership
私人公司所有權
It seems that Private Companies own 6.0%, of the C3.ai stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
看來私營公司擁有 C3.ai 股票的 6.0%。私營公司可能是關聯方。有時,內部人士通過持有私營公司來對上市公司感興趣,而不是以個人身份感興趣。雖然很難得出任何粗略的結論,但值得注意的是,這是一個有待進一步研究的領域。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for C3.ai you should be aware of, and 1 of them is significant.
雖然值得考慮擁有公司的不同羣體,但還有其他更爲重要的因素。一個很好的例子:我們發現了 C3.ai 的 3 個警告標誌 你應該知道,其中一個很重要。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但歸根結底 這是未來,而不是過去,這將決定這家企業的所有者的表現如何。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎? 取得聯繫 直接和我們在一起。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。 我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。 它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街在上述任何股票中都沒有頭寸。